Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

“Marriage Can’t Alter Reserved Status”: Upholds Caste Certificate Cancellation: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant verdict, the Supreme Court of India upheld the cancellation of a caste certificate obtained by an individual for claiming reservation benefits. The judgment, delivered by the bench of Chief Justice Dr. Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud and Justice J B Pardiwala, emphasized that marriage cannot alter an individual’s reserved status as determined at birth.

The case, arising from an appeal filed by the Bhubaneswar Development Authority, revolved around the validity of a caste certificate that had enabled an individual to secure a job reserved for Scheduled Castes. The appellant challenged a High Court judgment that directed the reconsideration of the individual’s claim for reinstatement based on outdated legal precedents.

The Supreme Court observed, “Acquisition of the status of Scheduled Caste by marriage would play fraud on the Constitution,” citing the decisions of Valsamma Paul v. Cochin University and Anjan Kumar v. Union of India. The Court clarified that a person’s status is determined at birth and cannot be altered post-marriage to claim reservation benefits.

In its detailed judgment, the Court reiterated the importance of caste certificates in reservation posts and the relevance of caste claims by birth, while also discussing the impact of invalidation on disciplinary proceedings and salary recovery.

Furthermore, the Court noted that the single judge’s direction for reconsideration was based on precedents that have since been overruled by a larger bench in Chairman and Managing Director, Food Corporation of India v. Jagdish Balaram Bahira.

The bench stated, Irrespective of whether or not the caste claim of the first respondent was fraudulent or otherwise, it is evident that the benefit which she obtained securing employment against a reserved post would have to be set aside once the caste claim has been rejected.”

Appellant’s appeal was allowed, the impugned judgment set aside, and the first respondent’s caste certificate invalidation was upheld. The Court also ordered that no recovery shall be made from the first respondent’s salary for the period worked.

Date of Decision: May 02, 2023

Bhubaneswar Development Authority vs Madhumita Das & Ors                 

                         

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/02-May-2023_Bhuvneshwar_Dev_Auth_Vs_Madhumita.pdf"]

Latest Legal News