Order Taking Cognizance Must Reflect Application Of Mind; Section 197 CrPC Sanction Mandatory For Prosecuting Public Servants: Karnataka High Court Plaint Cannot Be Rejected Partially Against Specific Defendants Or Properties; Limitation Is A Triable Issue: Telangana High Court Employee Having National Trade Certificate & Prior Experience To Be Treated As 'Highly Skilled' For Compensation: Orissa High Court Insurance Company Entitled To Subpoena Investigating Officer For Vehicle Records When Insured Is Untraceable: Madras High Court Seller's Fraudulent Conduct & Non-Disclosure Of Mortgage Justify Refund Of Advance Sale Consideration: Kerala High Court Complaint Under Section 138 NI Act Filed By Partner On Behalf Of Firm Maintainable Even Without Specific Authorization Letter: Gujarat High Court Extension Of Remand Beyond 180 Days Under NDPS Act Requires Public Prosecutor's Independent Report, Not Just IO's Request: Andhra Pradesh High Court Orissa Grama Panchayats Act | No Bar On Rescheduling No-Confidence Motion Meeting Before Its Commencement: High Court Non-Preparation Of ‘Nil’ Seizure List After Searching Raiding Officer Not Fatal To NDPS Prosecution: Calcutta High Court Registration Of Trademark Confers Exclusive Right To Sue For Infringement Irrespective Of Whether Mark Is In Use: Delhi High Court Presence Of Magistrate Not Mandatory For Recording Dying Declaration; Conviction Can Be Based On DD Recorded By Police: Bombay High Court Routine Bank Transfers Between Spouses For Daily Needs Are Gratuitous Payments, Not Recoverable As Entrusted Funds: Kerala High Court Clerical Lapses Under Work Pressure Amount To Dereliction Of Duty, Not Crime: Madras High Court Quashes Corruption Case Against Deputy BDO Burden Of Proving Sale Deed Is Bona Fide Lies On Beneficiary If Executant Is Illiterate Or Vulnerable: Andhra Pradesh High Court Employee Cannot Take Advantage Of Own Delay; Employer Not Required To Preserve Disciplinary Records For Eternity: Bombay High Court Deadline To File Evidence Under Rule 45 Trade Marks Rules Is Directory, Registrar Can Extend Time Under Section 131: Bombay High Court Exclusion Of Interest In Insurance Policy Is Conditional; Insurer Must Plead & Prove Employer's Failure To Comply With Act To Avoid Liability: Kerala High Court Practicing Lawyer Entitled To Interim Maintenance From Husband If Income Is Insufficient To Maintain Standard Of Living: Orissa High Court Section 138 NI Act Offences Can Be Compounded At Any Stage Even After Dismissal Of Revision Or Appeal: Madras High Court Unsuccessful Party Seeking Post-Award Interim Relief Under Section 9 Faces 'Higher Threshold', Must Show Rare & Compelling Circumstances: Bombay High Court

“Marriage Can’t Alter Reserved Status”: Upholds Caste Certificate Cancellation: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant verdict, the Supreme Court of India upheld the cancellation of a caste certificate obtained by an individual for claiming reservation benefits. The judgment, delivered by the bench of Chief Justice Dr. Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud and Justice J B Pardiwala, emphasized that marriage cannot alter an individual’s reserved status as determined at birth.

The case, arising from an appeal filed by the Bhubaneswar Development Authority, revolved around the validity of a caste certificate that had enabled an individual to secure a job reserved for Scheduled Castes. The appellant challenged a High Court judgment that directed the reconsideration of the individual’s claim for reinstatement based on outdated legal precedents.

The Supreme Court observed, “Acquisition of the status of Scheduled Caste by marriage would play fraud on the Constitution,” citing the decisions of Valsamma Paul v. Cochin University and Anjan Kumar v. Union of India. The Court clarified that a person’s status is determined at birth and cannot be altered post-marriage to claim reservation benefits.

In its detailed judgment, the Court reiterated the importance of caste certificates in reservation posts and the relevance of caste claims by birth, while also discussing the impact of invalidation on disciplinary proceedings and salary recovery.

Furthermore, the Court noted that the single judge’s direction for reconsideration was based on precedents that have since been overruled by a larger bench in Chairman and Managing Director, Food Corporation of India v. Jagdish Balaram Bahira.

The bench stated, Irrespective of whether or not the caste claim of the first respondent was fraudulent or otherwise, it is evident that the benefit which she obtained securing employment against a reserved post would have to be set aside once the caste claim has been rejected.”

Appellant’s appeal was allowed, the impugned judgment set aside, and the first respondent’s caste certificate invalidation was upheld. The Court also ordered that no recovery shall be made from the first respondent’s salary for the period worked.

Date of Decision: May 02, 2023

Bhubaneswar Development Authority vs Madhumita Das & Ors                 

                         

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/02-May-2023_Bhuvneshwar_Dev_Auth_Vs_Madhumita.pdf"]

Latest Legal News