Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

“Cal. High Court Sets Aside WBCERC Award, Observes ‘Double Standards’ in Medical Negligence Case”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the High Court at Calcutta has set aside an award by the West Bengal Clinical Establishment Regulatory Commission (WBCERC) that directed Park Hospitals to pay Rs. 20 lakh for alleged medical negligence. The case revolved around the unfortunate demise of Dr. Shraddha Bhutra, who was pregnant and under the care of Dr. Supriya Khetan.

The High Court observed that the Commission applied “double standards” in its judgment. “The Commission ought to have adverted to the aforesaid factors and yardsticks while deciding the issue of compensation,” the Court noted in Para 37 of the judgment.

The Court pointed out that Park Hospitals was not solely to blame for the tragic incident. “It is clear that Belle Vue kept the patient waiting for at least 35 minutes at a crucial juncture, immediately after which the patient met her demise,” the Court stated in Para 33.

The matter has been remanded for re-adjudication. “The matter is remanded to the respondent no.1-Commission for a re-adjudication, upon giving opportunity to the parties to produce further evidence,” the Court directed in Para 38.

The Court also highlighted the roles of other hospitals, including Apollo and Belle Vue, stating that they too played roles in the unfortunate series of events. “The Commission did not properly assess the roles of all involved Clinical Establishments,” the Court observed in Para 29.

The Commission has been directed to complete the re-adjudication as soon as possible, “preferably within three months from the date of communication of this order to the Commission,” as per Para 38 of the judgment.

This ruling is expected to have significant implications for medical negligence cases, particularly those involving multiple clinical establishments.

D.D-30.Aug.2023

Park Hospitals and another vs The West Bengal Clinical Establishment  Regulatory Commission and another

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Park_Hospital_Vs_WB_30Aug23_CalHC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News