Appellate Court Can Allow Additional Evidence To Ensure Fair Adjudication Even If Not Produced In Trial: Madhya Pradesh High Court Police Can Freeze Bank Accounts Under Section 106 BNSS Upon Suspicion Of 'Proceeds Of Crime': Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Penalty For Monthly MGQ Shortfall If Annual Target Met': Supreme Court Upholds Quashing Of Excise Department Demands For Liquor Licensees 'Murder Went Unavenged, But Courts Cannot Convict On Mere Assumptions': Supreme Court Acquits Accused In 1988 Murder Case, Quashes High Court's Remit Order 'NCSC Cannot Pass Mandatory Adjudicatory Orders Directing Payment Of Arrears': Supreme Court Clarifies Commission's Powers Under Article 338 "'Cannot Present Fait Accompli': Supreme Court Upholds Denial Of NOC To Airman For Skipping Prior Permission To Apply For Civil Post" Supreme Court Upholds 2017 Notification For Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearances, Quashes 2021 Office Memorandum As Impermissible Executive Overreach Workman Fails To Prove 240 Days Continuous Work; Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Denial Of Reinstatement For "Abandonment Of Service" Party Cannot Take Contradictory Stands In Same Case, Admissions In Pleadings Bind Them Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC: Telangana High Court Delayed Recovery Of Weapon From Open Space Casts Serious Doubt On Prosecution Story: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Murder Convicts Procedural Irregularities By Public Servants Serve As Circumstantial Evidence Of Conspiracy In Corruption Cases: Kerala High Court Blaming Previous Counsel For Omission Does Not Satisfy 'Due Diligence' Test To Amend Plaint After Trial Commences: Punjab & Haryana High Court Muslim Man's Second Marriage Under Special Marriage Act Void Despite Personal Law Permitting Bigamy: Karnataka High Court

 Kerala High Court Rejects Delay in FIR as Ground for Acquittal, Upholds Conviction and Modifies Sentence in Case of Sexual Assault

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark ruling, the Kerala High Court dismissed the delay in filing the First Information Report (FIR) as a valid ground for acquittal and upheld the conviction of the accused while modifying the sentence in a case of sexual assault. The court's decision, delivered on June 12, 2023, reinforces the significance of timely reporting of such heinous crimes. The headline highlights the court's rejection of the delay in FIR argument, underscoring the importance of taking prompt action in cases of sexual assault.

The division bench consisting of The Honourable Mr. Justice P.B. Suresh Kumar and The Honourable Mrs. Justice C.S. Sudha, pronounced their judgment on the appeal challenging the conviction and sentence of the accused, Raju. He stood charged with offenses punishable under Sections 376(2)(f) and 376(2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 23 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000.

Addressing the defense's contention regarding the delay in filing the FIR, the court firmly stated, "A child who was subjected to sexual assault by her father, not disclosing the same to anyone during her childhood, is no reason to think that what is spoken to by her at a matured age is false." The court further emphasized that the delay in lodging the FIR had been satisfactorily explained by the prosecution. This quote from the judgment emphasizes the court's stance on the significance of the victim's testimony and the need to consider the circumstances surrounding delayed reporting.

In addition to the delay argument, the defense raised other objections related to witness examination and corroborative evidence. However, the court found the victim's testimony to be credible, consistent, and supported by medical examination and expert opinions. The evidence presented by the victim was deemed genuine and devoid of doubt.

The judgment also addressed the modification of the sentence imposed on the accused. Considering various factors, including the social background of the parties involved, the court modified the sentence for the offense under Section 376(2)(f) of the IPC. The revised sentence imposed rigorous imprisonment for a period of 20 years, as opposed to imprisonment for the remainder of the accused's natural life.

The ruling sets a significant precedent, highlighting the court's stance on the importance of timely reporting in cases of sexual assault. It underscores the need to focus on the credibility of the victim's testimony while considering the specific circumstances of each case. The judgment serves as a reminder of the court's commitment to delivering justice and protecting the rights of survivors of sexual assault.

D.D-12 .JUNE. 2023

RAJU  VS STATE OF KERALA

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Raju_Vs_State_12_June_23_Kerla_HC1.pdf"]

Latest Legal News