Minor in Live-In Relationship Deemed 'Child in Need of Care' by High Court, Protection Ordered Under Juvenile Justice Act Cheque Signed, Sealed, and Bounced – No Escape from Liability: Delhi High Court Right to Defend Includes Right to Inspect Documents: Calcutta High Court Overrules Trial Court's Rejection of Inspection Petition Court Cannot Tinker with Finalized Consolidation Scheme Under Section 42: Punjab and Haryana High Court Remarriage During Appeal Period is Risky, But Not Void: Andhra Pradesh High Court State Cannot Sleep Over Its Rights: Supreme Court Criticizes Odisha Government for Delayed Appeals in Pension Dispute “Both Hands Intact” Rule is a Relic of the Past: Supreme Court Grants MBBS Admission to Disabled Student Terminal Benefits and Family Pension Alone Do Not Bar Compassionate Appointment, But Financial Distress Must Be Proven – Supreme Court Cruelty Under Section 498A IPC Is Not Limited to Dowry Harassment: Supreme Court Right to Speedy Trial Cannot Be Defeated by Delay Tactics: Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Fast-Tracking of Cheque Bounce Case Framing Charges Under Section 193 IPC Without Following Section 340 CrPC is Illegal: Calcutta High Court Doctrine of Part Performance Under Section 53-A TPA Not Applicable Without Proof of Possession: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mere Allegations of False Implication Cannot Override Strong Forensic and Documentary Evidence: Delhi High Court Upholds Conviction in Elderly Woman’s Murder and Robbery Case Applicant Not a Sexual Predator, Relationship Was Consensual: Bombay High Court Grants Bail in POCSO Case Fraudulent Transfers to Evade Creditors Cannot Escape Scrutiny: Punjab & Haryana High Court Restores Execution Petition Gujarat High Court Rules That Contractual Employees Cannot Claim Regularization of Services Serious Charges and Victim’s Suicide Justify Continued Detention: Gauhati High Court Denies Bail in POCSO Case No Permanent Establishment in India, Rejects Notional Income Taxation: Delhi High Court Rules in Favor of Nokia OY Statutory Bail Under NDPS Act Can Be Denied If FSL Report Reaches Court Before Bail Plea": Calcutta High Court Termination After Acquittal is Unjust: Bombay High Court Quashes Dismissal of Shikshan Sevak, Orders 50% Back Wages Denial of MBBS Seat Due to Administrative Lapses is Unacceptable": Andhra Pradesh High Court Awards ₹7 Lakh Compensation to Wronged Student Sessions Court Cannot Reclassify Non-Bailable Offences While Granting Anticipatory Bail: Allahabad High Court

 High Court Upholds Major Penalty in Central Bank of India Case: “No Leniency for Breach of Financial Trust” 

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin

 August 18, 2023

In a significant verdict delivered today, the   High Court of Judicature at Allahabad   upheld the major penalty imposed on Ramesh Chandra Pandey, a former bank employee of Central Bank of India, in a case that had garnered attention due to its implications on financial probity in the banking sector.

The Hon’ble Justice Kshitij Shailendra, who presided over the case, declared that the punishment awarded to Mr. Pandey was just and proper, stating, “Good conduct and discipline are inseparable from the functioning of every officer/employee of the bank.” The court emphasized that bank officers are entrusted with safeguarding the interests of depositors and customers, making it imperative for them to uphold the highest standards of honesty and integrity.

Mr. Pandey had been facing charges related to financial misconduct during his tenure at Central Bank of India. The charges included misappropriation of credit entries, altering financial records, and abusing his official position for personal gains. Despite earlier interventions by the court, the disciplinary proceedings ultimately concluded with a consolidated punishment of dismissal from service.

The court’s ruling stressed the significance of financial integrity in the banking sector, citing precedents where similar actions had been deemed violations of trust. The judgement further underlined that bank employees are held to a higher standard of conduct due to their role as custodians of public trust and finance.

This verdict underscores the judiciary’s commitment to maintaining the sanctity of financial institutions and reinforcing the importance of ethical behavior among employees. As the case sets a precedent for the banking industry, legal experts anticipate that it will prompt financial organizations to exercise greater vigilance in ensuring the conduct of their employees aligns with the highest ethical standards.

D.D on 18.08.2023

Ramesh Chandra Pandey vs  Central Bank Of India And Others

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Document_1_401.pdf"]

Similar News

  • by Admin
    07 May 2024 2:49 AM
Income tax returns not a foolproof defence against a charge of acquisition of assets disproportionate under the PC – SC
  • by Admin
    07 May 2024 2:49 AM
There could be no question of being permitted to reinstate after acceptance of the resignation.-SC
  • by Admin
    07 May 2024 2:49 AM
Appeal filed by Adani Gas Ltd seeking authorisation for city gas distribution network in three areas of Ahmedabad District in Gujarat with a cost of Rupees 10 lakhs. SC
  • by Admin
    07 May 2024 2:49 AM
Forcing to DNA test is violation of violate his personal liberty and right to privacy. – SC
  • by Admin
    07 May 2024 2:49 AM
Not interfere with the findings of fact recorded after appreciation of evidence merely because the High Court thought that another view would be a better view U/S 100 C.P.C - SC