Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

 High Court Upholds Major Penalty in Central Bank of India Case: “No Leniency for Breach of Financial Trust” 

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


 August 18, 2023

In a significant verdict delivered today, the   High Court of Judicature at Allahabad   upheld the major penalty imposed on Ramesh Chandra Pandey, a former bank employee of Central Bank of India, in a case that had garnered attention due to its implications on financial probity in the banking sector.

The Hon’ble Justice Kshitij Shailendra, who presided over the case, declared that the punishment awarded to Mr. Pandey was just and proper, stating, “Good conduct and discipline are inseparable from the functioning of every officer/employee of the bank.” The court emphasized that bank officers are entrusted with safeguarding the interests of depositors and customers, making it imperative for them to uphold the highest standards of honesty and integrity.

Mr. Pandey had been facing charges related to financial misconduct during his tenure at Central Bank of India. The charges included misappropriation of credit entries, altering financial records, and abusing his official position for personal gains. Despite earlier interventions by the court, the disciplinary proceedings ultimately concluded with a consolidated punishment of dismissal from service.

The court’s ruling stressed the significance of financial integrity in the banking sector, citing precedents where similar actions had been deemed violations of trust. The judgement further underlined that bank employees are held to a higher standard of conduct due to their role as custodians of public trust and finance.

This verdict underscores the judiciary’s commitment to maintaining the sanctity of financial institutions and reinforcing the importance of ethical behavior among employees. As the case sets a precedent for the banking industry, legal experts anticipate that it will prompt financial organizations to exercise greater vigilance in ensuring the conduct of their employees aligns with the highest ethical standards.

D.D on 18.08.2023

Ramesh Chandra Pandey vs  Central Bank Of India And Others

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Document_1_401.pdf"]

Latest Legal News