Delay in Test Identification & Absence of Motive Fatal to Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man for Murder Tokre Koli or Dhor Koli – Both Stand on Same Legal Footing: Bombay High Court Slams Scrutiny Committee for Disregarding Pre-Constitutional Records Consent Is No Defence When Victim Is Under 16: Delhi High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Granting Pre-Arrest Bail in Minor Rape Cases Would Send a Harmful Societal Signal: Delhi High Court Refuses Anticipatory Bail to Accused Citing POCSO’s Rigorous Standards Void Marriage No Shield Against Cruelty Charges: Karnataka High Court Affirms Section 498A Applies Even In Deceptive and Void Marital Relationships Consolidation Authorities Cannot Confer Ownership Or Alter Scheme Post Confirmation Without Due Process: Punjab & Haryana High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Jurisdiction Over Void Post-Scheme Orders Litigation Policy is Not Law, Can’t Enforce Guidelines Through Courts: Rajasthan High Court Refuses to Entertain Quo Warranto Against Additional Advocate General’s Appointment Police and Lawyers Are Two Limbs of Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance in Police Misconduct Incident Sole Testimony, Forensic Gaps, and Withheld Witness: No Conviction Possible: Delhi High Court Affirms Acquittal in Murder Trial Remand Keeps the Dispute Alive – Not Arrears: Bombay High Court Holds SVLDRS Relief Must Be Computed Under Litigation Category Daughter’s Right Extinguished When Partition Effected Prior to 2005 Amendment: Madras High Court Trial Courts Cannot Direct Filing of Challan After Conviction — Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Directions Against DSP Veer Singh Rule 4 Creates Parity, Not a Parallel Pension Pipeline: Rajasthan High Court Denies Dual Pension to Ex-Chief Justice Serving as SHRC Chairperson Right to Be Heard Must Be Preserved Where Claim Has a Legal Basis: Orissa High Court Upholds Impleadment of Will Beneficiary in Partition Suit Long-Term Ad Hocism Is Exploitation, Not Employment: Orissa High Court Orders Regularization Of Junior Typist After 25 Years Of Service PIL Cannot Be a Tool for Personal Grievances: Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Body’s Power to Revise Property Tax After 16 Years Omission of Accused’s Name by Eyewitness in FIR is a Fatal Lacuna: Supreme Court Acquits Man Convicted of Murder Correction In Revenue Map Under Section 30 Isn’t A Tool To Shift Plot Location After 17 Years: Supreme Court Quashes High Court’s Remand Casteist Abuses Must Be In Public View: Supreme Court Quashes SC/ST Act Proceedings Where Alleged Insults Occurred Inside Complainant’s House Resignation Bars Pension, But Not Gratuity: Supreme Court Draws Sharp Line Between Voluntary Retirement and Resignation in DTC Employee Case

 High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Termination of LPG Dealership Agreement

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Chandigarh, April 11, 2023: In a significant ruling, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana has dismissed a petition filed by M/s SRA HP Gas Agency and others challenging the termination of their LPG dealership agreement. The court, presided over by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jasgurpreet Singh Puri, upheld the termination letter issued by the Union of India and ruled that the termination was justified due to non-compliance with the eligibility criteria.

The petitioners had sought the quashing of the termination letter, which ended their dealership agreement for running the LPG dealership in Hoshiarpur. They argued that there was no concealment of material facts and that the termination was based on a malicious complaint filed by a competitor. The petitioners claimed that one of the partners held an Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) card and should be treated at par with a Non-Resident Indian (NRI) under the Citizenship Act, 1955.

However, the respondents contended that the eligibility criteria explicitly required the applicant to be an Indian citizen and a resident of India. They maintained that the Corporation did not permit OCIs or NRIs to apply for the dealership, and therefore, the petitioner's claim of OCI status did not make them eligible.

After considering the arguments from both sides, the court analyzed the provisions of the Citizenship Act, 1955 and a government notification. It concluded that the petitioner's OCI status did not fulfill the eligibility criteria, which necessitated being an Indian citizen and a resident of India. The court found that the termination of the dealership agreement was justified, as the petitioner did not meet the eligibility requirements.

Date of Decision:11.04.2023

M/s SRA HP Gas Agency and others vs  Union of India and others

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/P^0H-11-April-SRA-HP-Gas-Agency-and-others-Vs-UOI.pdf"]

Latest Legal News