Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court Illicit Affair Alone Cannot Make a Man Guilty of Abetting Suicide: Supreme Court Quashes Charge Under Section 306 IPC Landlord Cannot Be Punished for Slowness of Courts: Supreme Court on Bonafide Need in Eviction Suits Expect States To Enact Laws Regulating Unlicensed Money Lenders Charging Exorbitant Interest Contrary To 'Damdupat': Supreme Court Accused Who Skips Lok Adalat After Seeking It, Then Cries 'Prejudice', Cannot Claim Apprehension of Denial of Justice: Madras High Court Refuse To Transfer Case IO Cannot Act Without Prior Sanction: Gujarat High Court Grants Bail, Flags Procedural Lapse in Religious Conversion Case Electricity Board Strictly Liable For Unprotected Transformer, 7-Year-Old Cannot Be Guilty Of Contributory Negligence: Allahabad High Court POCSO Conviction Can't Stand For Offence Not Charged: Delhi High Court Member of Unlawful Assembly Cannot Escape Conviction By Claiming He Only Carried a Lathi and Struck No One: Allahabad High Court Jurisdiction Cannot Be Founded On Casual Or Incidental Facts If Not Have A Direct Nexus With The Lis: : Delhi High Court Clause Stating Disputes "Can" Be Settled By Arbitration Is Not A Binding Arbitration Agreement: Supreme Court State Cannot Plead Helplessness Against Sand Mafia; Supreme Court Warns Of Paramilitary Deployment, Complete Mining Ban In MP & Rajasthan Authority Cannot Withdraw Subsidy Citing Non-Compliance When It Ignored Repeated Requests For Inspection: Supreme Court Out-of-State SC/ST/OBC Candidates Cannot Claim Rajasthan's Reservation Benefits in NEET PG Counselling: Rajasthan High Court Supreme Court Upholds Haryana's Regularisation Of Qualified Ad Hoc Staff As 'One-Time Measure', Strikes Down Futuristic Cut-Offs

"Supreme Court Reinstates Compensation Award, Says 'Death Had Causal Connection to Employment'"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court of India reinstated the Workmen's Compensation Commissioner's award of ₹3,26,140 with 12% p.a. interest to the legal heirs of Sumer Singh, a driver who died while on duty. The Court set aside the High Court's reversal of the award, stating that the "death had a causal connection to employment."

The bench, comprising Justices HIMA KOHLI and RAJESH BINDAL, delivered the judgment on August 23, 2023. The case revolved around the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923, and questioned whether the death of an employee while on duty could be considered as arising out of employment.

The legal representatives of the deceased had filed an appeal against the High Court's decision, which had overturned the Commissioner's award. The Supreme Court found merit in the appeal and stated, "there is every reason to assume that long spells of driving was a material contributory factor, if not the sole cause that accelerated his unexpected death at a young age."

The Court also rejected the argument of the Insurance Company, which contended that the death did not arise out of employment. The Court noted that an "additional premium was paid to cover such eventualities under the 1923 Act."

The judgment cited previous cases like Param Pal Singh Through Father v. National Insurance Co. & Anr., and Northeast Karnataka Road Transport Corporation. v. Sujatha, to support its decision.

The ruling is seen as a significant step in clarifying the scope of the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923, particularly in cases involving the death of employees while on duty.

Date of Decision: August 23, 2023

Smt. Dariyao Kanwar & ors. vs M/s  United India Insurance Co. Ltd. & anr.

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/23-Aug-2023_Dariyao_Kanwar_Vs_United_india_Insurance.pdf"]

Latest Legal News