Inadequate Explanation Under Section 313 CrPC Cannot Be Foundation For Conviction If Prosecution Fails To Prove Case: Allahabad High Court No-Confidence Motion In Housing Societies Fails If 2/3 Majority Not Met; Fractions In Voting Threshold Cannot Be Rounded Down: Bombay High Court Successor Rent Controller Cannot Re-Appreciate Evidence Or Act As Appellate Court Under Review Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court Restores Eviction Order Article 21 Overrides PMLA Section 45 Rigors In Cases Of Unduly Long Incarceration Without Trial: Calcutta High Court Grants Bail To SSC Scam ‘Middleman’ Unregistered Family Partition Deed Recording Past Oral Arrangement Doesn't Require Compulsory Registration: Gujarat High Court Private Banks Acting As Authorised Dealers Under FEMA Amenable To Writ Jurisdiction; Can Refuse Transactions For 'Sanctions-Related' Concerns: Gauhati High Court Non-Examination Of Investigating Officer Not Fatal To Prosecution Case If Eyewitness Testimony Is Credible & Trustworthy: Jharkhand High Court Mere Denial Of Signature Insufficient When Execution Is Proved Through Endorsements: Karnataka High Court Restores Specific Performance Decree Sectarianism Claims Can't Discredit Reliable Testimony Of Child Sexual Abuse Victim: Kerala High Court Upholds Madrassa Teacher's Conviction State Must Prove Specific 'Public Interest' To Exempt Projects From Social Impact Assessment Under Section 10A Land Acquisition Act: Telangana High Court Or 2 Rule 2 CPC |Failure To Seek Specific Performance In Earlier Injunction Suit Bars Subsequent Claim; Readiness & Willingness Must Be Continuous: Madras High Court Exoneration In Departmental Proceedings Does Not Result In Automatic Discharge In Criminal Case: Orissa High Court History Sheet Can Be Opened On 'Reasonable Belief' Even Without Conviction, But Must Be Reviewed After 7 Years Of Good Conduct: Rajasthan High Court

"Supreme Court Reinstates Compensation Award, Says 'Death Had Causal Connection to Employment'"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court of India reinstated the Workmen's Compensation Commissioner's award of ₹3,26,140 with 12% p.a. interest to the legal heirs of Sumer Singh, a driver who died while on duty. The Court set aside the High Court's reversal of the award, stating that the "death had a causal connection to employment."

The bench, comprising Justices HIMA KOHLI and RAJESH BINDAL, delivered the judgment on August 23, 2023. The case revolved around the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923, and questioned whether the death of an employee while on duty could be considered as arising out of employment.

The legal representatives of the deceased had filed an appeal against the High Court's decision, which had overturned the Commissioner's award. The Supreme Court found merit in the appeal and stated, "there is every reason to assume that long spells of driving was a material contributory factor, if not the sole cause that accelerated his unexpected death at a young age."

The Court also rejected the argument of the Insurance Company, which contended that the death did not arise out of employment. The Court noted that an "additional premium was paid to cover such eventualities under the 1923 Act."

The judgment cited previous cases like Param Pal Singh Through Father v. National Insurance Co. & Anr., and Northeast Karnataka Road Transport Corporation. v. Sujatha, to support its decision.

The ruling is seen as a significant step in clarifying the scope of the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923, particularly in cases involving the death of employees while on duty.

Date of Decision: August 23, 2023

Smt. Dariyao Kanwar & ors. vs M/s  United India Insurance Co. Ltd. & anr.

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/23-Aug-2023_Dariyao_Kanwar_Vs_United_india_Insurance.pdf"]

Latest Legal News