Sale Deeds Must Be Interpreted Literally When the Language is Clear and Unambiguous: Supreme Court    |     Non-Signatory Can Be Bound by Arbitration Clause Based on Conduct and Involvement: Supreme Court    |     Right to Passport is a Fundamental Right, Denial Without Justification Violates Article 21: Allahabad High Court    |     Insurance Company's Liability Remains Despite Policy Cancellation Due to Dishonored Cheque: Calcutta High Court    |     Deductions Under Sections 36(1)(vii) and 36(1)(viia) of the Income Tax Act Are Independent and Cannot Be Curtailed: Bombay High Court    |     Diary Entries Cannot Alone Implicate the Accused Without Corroborative Evidence: Supreme Court Upholds Discharge of Accused in Corruption Case    |     MACT | Fraud Vitiates All Judicial Acts, Even Without Specific Review Powers: Rajasthan High Court    |     Right of Private Defense Cannot Be Weighed in Golden Scales: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Appellant in Culpable Homicide Case    |     If Two Reasonable Conclusions Are Possible, Acquittal Should Not Be Disturbed: Supreme Court    |     Kalelkar Award Explicitly Provides Holiday Benefits for Temporary Employees, Not Subject to Government Circulars: Supreme Court Upholds Holiday and Overtime Pay    |     NDPS | Homogeneous Mixing of Bulk Drugs Essential for Valid Sampling Under NDPS Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court    |     Pre-Arrest Bail Not a Right but an Exception: Himachal High Court Denied Bail In Dowry Death Case"    |     POCSO | Scholar Register Is Sufficient to Determine Victim’s Age in POCSO Cases: Madhya Pradesh High Court    |     Abuse of Official Position in Appointments: Prima Facie Case for Criminal Misconduct: Delhi High Court Upholds Framing of Charges Against Swati Maliwal in DCW Corruption Case    |     Service Law | Similarly Situated Employees Cannot Be Denied Equal Treatment: PH High Court Orders Regularization    |     Presumption of Innocence Remains Supreme Unless Clearly Overturned: PH High Court Affirming Acquittal    |     Any Physical Liaison with A Girl Of Less Than Eighteen Years Is A Strict Offense.: Patna High Court Reiterates Strict Stance On Sexual Offences Against Minors    |     Orissa High Court Rules Res Judicata Inapplicable When Multiple Appeals Arise from Same Judgment    |     Mandatory Section 80 Notice Cannot Be Bypassed Lightly:  Jammu & Kashmir High Court Returns Plaint for Non-Compliance    |     Bombay High Court Denies Permanent Lecturer Appointment for Failing to Meet UGC Eligibility Criteria at Time of Appointment    |     Deferred Cross-Examination Gave Time for Witness Tampering, Undermining Fair Trial: Allahabad High Court    |     Dowry Death | Presumption Under Section 113-B Not Applicable as No Proof of Cruelty Soon Before Death : Supreme Court    |     Gift Deed Voided as Son Fails to Care for Elderly Mother, Karnataka High Court Asserts ‘Implied Duty’ in Property Transfers    |     Denial of a legible 164 statement is a denial of a fair trial guaranteed by the Constitution of India: Kerala High Court    |     Safety Shoes Used as Weapon Meets Mens Rea Requirement for Murder: Rajasthan HC on Bail Denial    |     Fraud on the Courts Cannot Be Tolerated: Supreme Court Ordered CBI Investigation Against Advocate    |     Land Acquisition | Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. (JAL) Liable for Compensation under Supplementary Award, Not Ultra-Tech Cement Ltd.: Supreme Court    |     Non-Mentioning of Bail Orders in Detention Reflects Clear Non-Application of Mind: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order    |     Conviction Under Arms Act and Criminal Conspiracy Quashed Due to Non-Seizure of Key Evidence and Failure to Prove Ownership of Box: Jharkhand High Court    |     Prima Facie Proof of Valid Marriage Required Before Awarding Maintenance Under Section 125 Cr.P.C: Calcutta High Court Sets Aside Interim Maintenance Order    |    

Tribunal Must Be Alive to the Contentions Raised in the Securitisation Application” – Kerala High Court Dismisses Challenge Against DRT’s SARFAESI Act Decisions

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Kerala High Court, under the judgment of Justice K. Babu, has dismissed a petition contesting the Debt Recovery Tribunal-I, Ernakulam’s orders regarding the enforcement of security interest under the SARFAESI Act against M/S JIS International Exports Pvt. Ltd. This decision came after allegations of substantial loan defaults by the petitioner.

The core legal discussion centered on the challenge to the enforcement actions under the SARFAESI Act, scrutinizing both the jurisdiction of the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) and its adherence to procedural and statutory requirements.

The petitioners, M/S JIS International Exports Pvt. Ltd., faced actions under the SARFAESI Act initiated by Indian Overseas Bank due to alleged failures to repay loans totaling approximately Rs. 1430 Lakhs. The petition raised questions about the procedural correctness and jurisdictional authority of the DRT’s orders.

Jurisdiction and Adherence to Procedure: The High Court confirmed that the DRT had appropriately exercised its jurisdiction and followed the procedures as prescribed under the SARFAESI Act, aligning with previous High Court directives.

Analysis under SARFAESI Act: It was determined that the DRT correctly applied legal provisions, particularly regarding the enforcement of security interests, and that the procedural challenges raised by the petitioners were without merit.

Compliance with Mandatory Requirements: The Tribunal’s actions in granting physical possession of secured assets were upheld, with findings that statutory requirements under the SARFAESI Act were met.

Interim Relief Principles: The Court emphasized the Tribunal’s duty to consider the merits of the case based on the principles of interim relief, including a strong prima facie case, balance of convenience, and prevention of irreparable injury. The Tribunal was found to have properly considered these aspects in its deliberations.

Decision The petition was dismissed, affirming the DRT’s decisions under the SARFAESI Act. This judgment underlines the adequacy of the statutory frameworks within the SARFAESI Act for redressal and enforcement of security interests.

 Date of Decision: April 19, 2024

M/S JIS International Exports Pvt. Ltd. And Others v. Debt Recovery Tribunal-1 Ernakulam, Indian Overseas Bank, and Others

Similar News