Detailed Description Of Concealment Not Mandatory Under Section 27 Evidence Act: Bombay High Court Upholds Murder Conviction Child Is Not A Pawn To Prove Mother's Adultery: Andhra Pradesh High Court Dismisses Husband's DNA Test Petition In Desertion Divorce Case Shareholder Ratification Cannot Cure Fraud Under SEBI's PFUTP Regulations: Supreme Court Restores Rs. 70 Lakh Penalty on Company When High Court Judges Themselves Disagree on the Answer, Can a Law Graduate Be Penalised for Getting It Wrong? Supreme Court Says No Superficial Burns Don't Mean Silence: Supreme Court Explains Why 80-90% Burn Victim Could Still Make a Valid Dying Declaration Daughter's Eyewitness Account, Dying Declaration Seal Husband's Fate: Supreme Court Upholds Life Sentence for Wife-Burning Murder Supreme Court Rejects Rs. 106 Crore Compensation Claim; Directs SECL to Supply Coal to Prakash Industries at 2014 or 2019 Prices for Wrongfully Suspended Period Section 319 CrPC | Trial Court Cannot Conduct Mini Trial While Deciding Application to Summon Additional Accused: Supreme Court Accused Can't Be Left Without Documents To Defend: Calcutta High Court Directs Adjudicating Authority To First Decide Whether Complete 'Relied Upon Documents' Were Served In PMLA Proceedings Husband Who Took Voluntary Retirement at 47 Cannot Escape Maintenance Duty: Delhi High Court Upholds ₹10,000/Month to Wife and Daughter Cannot Claim Monopoly Over a Deity's Name: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Trademark Injunction Against 'Kshetrapal Construction' Eviction Appeal Cannot Require Actual Surrender Of Possession, Symbolic Possession Sufficient: J&K High Court Amendment Introducing Time-Barred Relief And Changing Nature Of Suit Cannot Be Allowed: Karnataka High Court Counter Claim Is An Independent Suit: MP High Court Rules Properties Beyond Territorial Jurisdiction Cannot Be Dragged Into Counter Claim Co-Sharer Cannot Be Bound By Passage Carved Out Without His Consent: Punjab & Haryana High Court Modifies Concurrent Decrees ‘Prima Facie True’ Is Enough to Deny Liberty: Punjab & Haryana High Court Refuses Bail in Babbar Khalsa Terror Conspiracy Case High Court Cannot Quash FIR for Forgery When Handwriting Expert's Report Is Still Awaited: Supreme Court Supreme Court Calls for Paternity Leave Law, Says Father's Absence in Child's Early Years Leaves a "Quiet Cost" That Lasts a Lifetime Three-Month Age Cap for Adoptive Mothers' Maternity Benefit Struck Down: Supreme Court Reads Down Section 60(4) of Social Security Code Bank Cannot Rely on Charter Party Agreement to Justify Remittance Contrary to Customer's Instructions: Supreme Court 19 Candidates Linked to Accused, Papers of Five Subjects Leaked: Allahabad High Court Upholds Cancellation of UP Assistant Professor Exam Result

Timely Reforms Required To Meet Challenges Confronting The Institution: Supreme Court Directs SCBA For Member-Driven Changes

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India emphasized the importance of timely and member-inclusive reforms within the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA). Addressing issues regarding SCBA governance, elections, and membership criteria, the Court observed, “The norms, eligibility conditions, membership fee structure etc., cannot remain static for decades and timely reforms to meet with the challenges that may confront the institution from time to time, are required to be carried out.”

The judgment arose from the failure of certain resolutions proposed during the SCBA Special General Body Meeting held on 30th April 2024. These included changes to eligibility criteria for office bearers, modifications in membership fees, and the introduction of minimum reservation quotas for women in the SCBA Executive Committee. All proposed resolutions failed to secure the required two-thirds majority vote, prompting judicial review.

The Supreme Court thoroughly reviewed the SCBA’s proposed changes and the broader implications for governance within the Bar. The Justices, Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant and Hon’ble Mr. Justice K.V. Viswanathan, provided a structured response to each issue:

Reform Proposals: The Court acknowledged the need for updating SCBA’s rules and procedures to stay relevant and effective but highlighted the necessity for these changes to be widely accepted and member-driven.

Election Process: Specific directions were issued for the upcoming SCBA elections, scheduled for 16th May 2024, ensuring an inclusive and updated voter list and establishing a senior advocate-led Election Committee to oversee the process.

Women’s Reservation: In a progressive move, the Court mandated a minimum reservation for women, stating, “Some of the posts in the Executive Committee must be reserved for women members of the Bar,” setting specific quotas for various committee roles.

Engagement and Transparency: The Court ordered the SCBA Executive Committee to invite and compile suggestions for reforms from its members by 19th July 2024, demonstrating a commitment to transparency and member engagement in the reform process.

Decision Concluding its decision, the Supreme Court mandated the SCBA to undertake a detailed and transparent reform process, involving the suggestions and active participation of its members. The decision ensures not only the responsiveness of SCBA governance structures to the needs of its members but also strengthens the democratic ethos within the institution.

Date of Decision: 2nd May 2024

Supreme Court Bar Association vs B.D. Kaushik

Latest Legal News