Supreme Court Holds Allottees Who Elected RERA Remedy Cannot Subsequently Seek Interim Relief Under Section 9 Arbitration Act Lodging FIR Does Not Amount To Instigation: Supreme Court Quashes Section 306 IPC Case Against In-Laws Over Husband's Suicide Vigilant Citizen Deserves Acknowledgment: Supreme Court Sets Strict Timelines For 20-Year-Old Subway Project, Lauds Litigant's Relentless Legal Battle Lawyer Cannot Disclose Privileged Information On TV Even If Client Becomes Adversary: Supreme Court Upholds Suspension Of Advocate Rizwan Siddique, Slaps ₹5 Lakh Cost On Both Parties Supreme Court Modifies 3-Year Bar Practice Rule; Orders 1-Year Practice Coupled With 2-Year Academy Training & Clerkship Model Made A Scapegoat Under Pressure Of Public Outcry: Delhi High Court Acquits Man Sentenced To Life In POCSO Case Doctrine Of Lis Pendens Applies To Court Auctions; Purchaser Bound By Outcome Of Pending Specific Performance Suit: Allahabad High Court Andhra Pradesh High Court Rules Section 65B Evidence Act Objection Cannot Be Raised For First Time In Appeal Two-Month Time Limit To File Evidence Under Rule 45 Of Trade Marks Rules 2017 Is Mandatory; Non-Compliance Results In Deemed Abandonment: Madras High Court SEBI Act | Special Law Overrides General Law': Bombay High Court Quashes Police FIR Against Ex-Axis Mutual Fund Chief Dealer In Front-Running Case 'Truth Cannot Be Sacrificed At The Altar Of Rigid Timelines': Calcutta High Court Upholds Section 311 CrPC Powers At Any Stage For Just Decision 'A Dispute Does Not Cease To Be Criminal Merely Because It Involves Commercial Transaction': Chhattisgarh High Court Refuses To Quash Cheating FIR In ₹4.39 Cr Land Deal Holding In Designated Centres Only Way If Foreigner Cannot Be Expelled: Gauhati High Court Denies Bail To Declared Foreigner Who Illegally Re-Entered India Madras High Court Issues Guidelines Against Police Harassment Under Guise Of Enquiry, Mandates Written Summons Under Section 179 BNSS Grave Ramifications On Rights': Punjab & Haryana High Court Mandates Strict Compliance Of Section 82 CrPC Before Declaring Accused As Proclaimed Person 'Interacting With Father Benefits Child's Well-Being': Kerala High Court Grants Virtual Access To Father After Mother Takes Child Abroad Violating Restraint Order Agreement In Family Member’s Name Cannot Shield Occupants Under Section 53-A TP Act': Uttarakhand High Court Upholds Eviction Of Licensees Not Filling A Lacuna: Subsequent Forensic Report From Criminal Case Can Be Produced As Additional Evidence In Civil Suit: Punjab & Haryana High Court Mere Nomination In FIR Not Enough For Vicarious Liability: Allahabad High Court Acquits Murder Accused Under Section 149 IPC Demanding Separations From Depending In-Laws Constitute Mental Cruelty: Calcutta High Court Upholds Divorce Human Memory Not Photographic: Allahabad High Court Upholds Murder Conviction, Reiterates 'Falsus In Uno' Maxim Has No Application In India Litigant Claiming To Be Sub-Tenant Before Revenue Authorities Cannot Set Up Plea Of Adverse Possession In Civil Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court Civil Death": Orissa High Court Rules Blacklisting Of Contractor Without Specific Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice Delay Irrespective Of Number Of Years Ought To Be Condoned In Land Acquisition Matters': Punjab & Haryana High Court Condones 3953 Days Delay 'Notary Cannot Act As Marriage Officer': Madhya Pradesh High Court Accepts Notary's Apology With ₹2 Lakh Welfare Cost, Directs Display Board Against Notarizing Marriages

Timely Reforms Required To Meet Challenges Confronting The Institution: Supreme Court Directs SCBA For Member-Driven Changes

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India emphasized the importance of timely and member-inclusive reforms within the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA). Addressing issues regarding SCBA governance, elections, and membership criteria, the Court observed, “The norms, eligibility conditions, membership fee structure etc., cannot remain static for decades and timely reforms to meet with the challenges that may confront the institution from time to time, are required to be carried out.”

The judgment arose from the failure of certain resolutions proposed during the SCBA Special General Body Meeting held on 30th April 2024. These included changes to eligibility criteria for office bearers, modifications in membership fees, and the introduction of minimum reservation quotas for women in the SCBA Executive Committee. All proposed resolutions failed to secure the required two-thirds majority vote, prompting judicial review.

The Supreme Court thoroughly reviewed the SCBA’s proposed changes and the broader implications for governance within the Bar. The Justices, Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant and Hon’ble Mr. Justice K.V. Viswanathan, provided a structured response to each issue:

Reform Proposals: The Court acknowledged the need for updating SCBA’s rules and procedures to stay relevant and effective but highlighted the necessity for these changes to be widely accepted and member-driven.

Election Process: Specific directions were issued for the upcoming SCBA elections, scheduled for 16th May 2024, ensuring an inclusive and updated voter list and establishing a senior advocate-led Election Committee to oversee the process.

Women’s Reservation: In a progressive move, the Court mandated a minimum reservation for women, stating, “Some of the posts in the Executive Committee must be reserved for women members of the Bar,” setting specific quotas for various committee roles.

Engagement and Transparency: The Court ordered the SCBA Executive Committee to invite and compile suggestions for reforms from its members by 19th July 2024, demonstrating a commitment to transparency and member engagement in the reform process.

Decision Concluding its decision, the Supreme Court mandated the SCBA to undertake a detailed and transparent reform process, involving the suggestions and active participation of its members. The decision ensures not only the responsiveness of SCBA governance structures to the needs of its members but also strengthens the democratic ethos within the institution.

Date of Decision: 2nd May 2024

Supreme Court Bar Association vs B.D. Kaushik

Latest Legal News