Inability To Trace Beneficiaries Cannot Defeat Or Postpone Compensation Disbursal: Supreme Court Directs High Court Suo Motu Proceedings Disability Pension | Mere Manifestation Of Disease During Military Service Without Causal Connection Is Not Sufficient For Entitlement: Supreme Court Prevention Of Corruption Act | Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money Without Proof Of Demand Cannot Sustain Conviction: Supreme Court Appointment Contrary To Statutory Requirements And Advertisement Terms Amounts To Fraud On Public: Supreme Court IT Act | Once Settlement Commission Admits Application Under Section 245C, Assessing Officer Loses Jurisdiction To Reopen Assessment Under Section 148: Supreme Court NDPS Act | Prosecution Must Establish Unbroken Chain Of Custody For Samples, Failure To Comply With Section 52-A Renders FSL Report Inadmissible: Supreme Court Section 180 BNSS | Investigating Officers Must Adopt Transparent Practices; DGP Should Consider Making Audio-Video Recording Of Witness Statements Mandatory: Allahabad High Court Rowdy Sheet Cannot Be Opened In A Mechanical Manner Based On Mere Pendency Of Two Criminal Cases: Andhra Pradesh High Court 'Surname Protection Under Section 35 Trade Marks Act Not Restricted To Natural Persons': Bombay High Court Allows Corporate Body To Use Family Name Circumstantial Evidence | Prosecution Must Prove Connectivity Between Accused And Crime, Mere 'Last Seen' Theory Insufficient: Calcutta High Court Section 482 BNSS | Criminal Prosecution Against Company Directors Cannot Be Quashed When Investigation Reveals Active Role Beyond Mere Designation: Delhi High Court Cannot Be Permitted To Patch Up Weak Points: Karnataka High Court Dismisses Belated Order 41 Rule 27 CPC Plea Order XXI Rule 90 CPC | Burden To Prove Material Irregularity Or Fraud In Court Auction Sale Lies Upon Judgment Debtor: Kerala High Court Departmental Instructions Not Being Mandatory, Non-Compliance Does Not Vitiate Enquiry If Guilt Is Proved By Other Cogent Evidence: Delhi High Court Doctrine Of Res Gestae | Hearsay Evidence Can Be Admissible If Statement Is Spontaneous And Contemporaneous With The Occurrence: Madras High Court Relatives Cannot Be Roped Into Matrimonial Disputes On The Basis Of Omnibus Allegations: Madhya Pradesh High Court Grants Discharge Victim In Private Complaint Case Entitled To File Appeal Against Acquittal Before Sessions Court U/S 372 CrPC: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 58 BNSS | Detention Beyond 24 Hours Without Magistrate’s Authority Vitiates Remand, Entitles Accused To Bail: Orissa High Court Section 18 Limitation Act | Acknowledgement Of Loan In Promissory Note Extends Period Of Limitation For Entire Debt: Delhi High Court Section 138 NI Act | Existence Of Defence Founded On Disputed Facts Cannot Be Ground To Scuttle Cheque Bounce Prosecution At Inception: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Timely Reforms Required To Meet Challenges Confronting The Institution: Supreme Court Directs SCBA For Member-Driven Changes

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India emphasized the importance of timely and member-inclusive reforms within the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA). Addressing issues regarding SCBA governance, elections, and membership criteria, the Court observed, “The norms, eligibility conditions, membership fee structure etc., cannot remain static for decades and timely reforms to meet with the challenges that may confront the institution from time to time, are required to be carried out.”

The judgment arose from the failure of certain resolutions proposed during the SCBA Special General Body Meeting held on 30th April 2024. These included changes to eligibility criteria for office bearers, modifications in membership fees, and the introduction of minimum reservation quotas for women in the SCBA Executive Committee. All proposed resolutions failed to secure the required two-thirds majority vote, prompting judicial review.

The Supreme Court thoroughly reviewed the SCBA’s proposed changes and the broader implications for governance within the Bar. The Justices, Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant and Hon’ble Mr. Justice K.V. Viswanathan, provided a structured response to each issue:

Reform Proposals: The Court acknowledged the need for updating SCBA’s rules and procedures to stay relevant and effective but highlighted the necessity for these changes to be widely accepted and member-driven.

Election Process: Specific directions were issued for the upcoming SCBA elections, scheduled for 16th May 2024, ensuring an inclusive and updated voter list and establishing a senior advocate-led Election Committee to oversee the process.

Women’s Reservation: In a progressive move, the Court mandated a minimum reservation for women, stating, “Some of the posts in the Executive Committee must be reserved for women members of the Bar,” setting specific quotas for various committee roles.

Engagement and Transparency: The Court ordered the SCBA Executive Committee to invite and compile suggestions for reforms from its members by 19th July 2024, demonstrating a commitment to transparency and member engagement in the reform process.

Decision Concluding its decision, the Supreme Court mandated the SCBA to undertake a detailed and transparent reform process, involving the suggestions and active participation of its members. The decision ensures not only the responsiveness of SCBA governance structures to the needs of its members but also strengthens the democratic ethos within the institution.

Date of Decision: 2nd May 2024

Supreme Court Bar Association vs B.D. Kaushik

Latest Legal News