MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Timely Reforms Required To Meet Challenges Confronting The Institution: Supreme Court Directs SCBA For Member-Driven Changes

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India emphasized the importance of timely and member-inclusive reforms within the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA). Addressing issues regarding SCBA governance, elections, and membership criteria, the Court observed, “The norms, eligibility conditions, membership fee structure etc., cannot remain static for decades and timely reforms to meet with the challenges that may confront the institution from time to time, are required to be carried out.”

The judgment arose from the failure of certain resolutions proposed during the SCBA Special General Body Meeting held on 30th April 2024. These included changes to eligibility criteria for office bearers, modifications in membership fees, and the introduction of minimum reservation quotas for women in the SCBA Executive Committee. All proposed resolutions failed to secure the required two-thirds majority vote, prompting judicial review.

The Supreme Court thoroughly reviewed the SCBA’s proposed changes and the broader implications for governance within the Bar. The Justices, Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant and Hon’ble Mr. Justice K.V. Viswanathan, provided a structured response to each issue:

Reform Proposals: The Court acknowledged the need for updating SCBA’s rules and procedures to stay relevant and effective but highlighted the necessity for these changes to be widely accepted and member-driven.

Election Process: Specific directions were issued for the upcoming SCBA elections, scheduled for 16th May 2024, ensuring an inclusive and updated voter list and establishing a senior advocate-led Election Committee to oversee the process.

Women’s Reservation: In a progressive move, the Court mandated a minimum reservation for women, stating, “Some of the posts in the Executive Committee must be reserved for women members of the Bar,” setting specific quotas for various committee roles.

Engagement and Transparency: The Court ordered the SCBA Executive Committee to invite and compile suggestions for reforms from its members by 19th July 2024, demonstrating a commitment to transparency and member engagement in the reform process.

Decision Concluding its decision, the Supreme Court mandated the SCBA to undertake a detailed and transparent reform process, involving the suggestions and active participation of its members. The decision ensures not only the responsiveness of SCBA governance structures to the needs of its members but also strengthens the democratic ethos within the institution.

Date of Decision: 2nd May 2024

Supreme Court Bar Association vs B.D. Kaushik

Latest Legal News