Lack Of Title Documents In Lal Dora Land Does Not Relieve Plaintiff From Proving Continuous Possession To Claim Ownership: Delhi High Court Unauthorized Video Recording Of Court Proceedings Without Prior Permission Amounts To Contempt Of Court: Bombay High Court Finality Of Litigation | State Cannot Re-Litigate Settled Decrees By Alleging Collusion After Affirmation Up To Supreme Court: Allahabad High Court SC/ST Act | Court Cannot Determine Conversion Status To Quash FIR Before Completion Of Investigation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Absence Of Manufacturing Activity And Dilapidated Condition Of Premises Constitute Valid Grounds For Closure: Bombay High Court Non-Disclosure Of Existing Insurance Policies In Proposal Form Entitles Insurer To Repudiate Claim: Calcutta High Court Will Interpretation | Bequest Of "Above Said Property" Includes Entire Estate, Not Just Descriptive Portions Mentioned Therein: Delhi High Court Limitation Act | Court Can Balance Equities By Denying Interest For Delay Period In Land Acquisition Appeals: Gujarat High Court Article 21 Constitution Of India | Personal Liberty Of Detenue Cannot Be Curtailed Without Authority Of Law Post-Acquittal: Jharkhand High Court Order 8 Rule 1A CPC | Trial Court Should Not Reject Documents Merely For Delay If Foundation Is Laid In Pleadings: Andhra Pradesh High Court Order XXII CPC Applies To SCC Suits; Rule 25 Of U.P. Urban Buildings Rules Does Not Govern Substitution Where Act Is Inapplicable: Allahabad High Court Recruitment Authorities Cannot Insist On Impossible Experience Criteria: Karnataka High Court Rules Against Rejection Of Motor Vehicle Inspector Candidates Order 38 Rule 8 CPC | Claim Petition Cannot Be Allowed Ex-Parte Without Adjudication On Merits: Kerala High Court Succession Certificate Under Section 372 Indian Succession Act Cannot Be Granted When Title Is Subject To Intricate Questions Of Fact And Law: Madras High Court SARFAESI Act | District Magistrate Cannot Adjudicate Disputes Between Borrower And Secured Creditor While Assisting Possession: Madhya Pradesh High Court Termination Based On Caste Status Without Cancellation Of Original Certificate Is Legally Unsustainable: Orissa High Court Section 13 Punjab Village Common Lands Act | Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Ousted In Private Injunction Suits Where Title Against Panchayat Is Not Sought: High Court Rights Of Persons With Disabilities Act  | Equal Opportunity Policy Of Employer Is Mandatory; Routine Transfer Policy Must Yield To Special Provisions For Caregivers: Rajasthan High Court Compensation Must Be Just, Not A Pittance: Punjab & Haryana High Court Enhances Award In Motor Accident Claim Registration Act | Sub-Registrar Has No Power To Adjudicate Title Or Refuse Registration Based On Unauthorized Layouts: Telangana High Court Section 50 NDPS Act | Failure To Individually Communicate Right To Be Searched Before Gazetted Officer Or Magistrate Vitiates Conviction: Telangana High Court

Timely Reforms Required To Meet Challenges Confronting The Institution: Supreme Court Directs SCBA For Member-Driven Changes

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India emphasized the importance of timely and member-inclusive reforms within the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA). Addressing issues regarding SCBA governance, elections, and membership criteria, the Court observed, “The norms, eligibility conditions, membership fee structure etc., cannot remain static for decades and timely reforms to meet with the challenges that may confront the institution from time to time, are required to be carried out.”

The judgment arose from the failure of certain resolutions proposed during the SCBA Special General Body Meeting held on 30th April 2024. These included changes to eligibility criteria for office bearers, modifications in membership fees, and the introduction of minimum reservation quotas for women in the SCBA Executive Committee. All proposed resolutions failed to secure the required two-thirds majority vote, prompting judicial review.

The Supreme Court thoroughly reviewed the SCBA’s proposed changes and the broader implications for governance within the Bar. The Justices, Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant and Hon’ble Mr. Justice K.V. Viswanathan, provided a structured response to each issue:

Reform Proposals: The Court acknowledged the need for updating SCBA’s rules and procedures to stay relevant and effective but highlighted the necessity for these changes to be widely accepted and member-driven.

Election Process: Specific directions were issued for the upcoming SCBA elections, scheduled for 16th May 2024, ensuring an inclusive and updated voter list and establishing a senior advocate-led Election Committee to oversee the process.

Women’s Reservation: In a progressive move, the Court mandated a minimum reservation for women, stating, “Some of the posts in the Executive Committee must be reserved for women members of the Bar,” setting specific quotas for various committee roles.

Engagement and Transparency: The Court ordered the SCBA Executive Committee to invite and compile suggestions for reforms from its members by 19th July 2024, demonstrating a commitment to transparency and member engagement in the reform process.

Decision Concluding its decision, the Supreme Court mandated the SCBA to undertake a detailed and transparent reform process, involving the suggestions and active participation of its members. The decision ensures not only the responsiveness of SCBA governance structures to the needs of its members but also strengthens the democratic ethos within the institution.

Date of Decision: 2nd May 2024

Supreme Court Bar Association vs B.D. Kaushik

Latest Legal News