CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness Employee Cannot Switch Cadre At His Sweet Will After Accepting Promotion: J&K High Court Rejects Claim For Retrospective Assistant Registrar Appointment Anticipatory Bail Cannot Expire With Charge-Sheet: Supreme Court Reiterates Liberty Is Not Bound by Procedural Milestones Order II Rule 2 Cannot Eclipse Amendment Power Under Order VI Rule 17: MP High Court Refuses to Stall Will-Based Title Suit Grounds of Arrest Must Be Personal, Not Formal – But Detailed Allegations Suffice: Kerala High Court Upholds Arrest in Sabarimala Gold Misappropriation Case Grounds of Arrest Are Not a Ritual – They Are a Constitutional Mandate Under Article 22(1): Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Arrest for Non-Supply of Written Grounds Sect. 25 NDPS | Mere Ownership Cannot Fasten NDPS Liability – ‘Knowingly Permits’ Must Be Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt: MP High Court Section 308 CrPC | Revocation of Pardon Is Not Automatic on Prosecutor’s Certificate: Karnataka High Court Joint Family and Ancestral Property Are Alien to Mohammedan Law: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Injunction Right to Health Cannot Wait for Endless Consultations: Supreme Court Pulls Up FSSAI Over Delay in Front-of-Pack Warning Labels If A Son Dies Intestate Leaving Wife And Children, The Mother Has No Share: Karnataka High Court

Terminating Employment Because the Woman Has Got Married Is a Coarse Case of Gender Discrimination: Gender Discrimination in Military Nursing Service Struck Down by Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India, comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta, ruled against the wrongful termination of Ex. Lt. Selina John from the Military Nursing Service on the grounds of her marriage, marking a significant step against gender discrimination in the armed forces.

Brief on Legal Point: The crux of the judgment revolved around the issue of gender discrimination, particularly the invalidity of terminating a woman’s employment solely based on her marital status. The apex court held this practice as manifestly arbitrary and a glaring instance of gender discrimination.

Facts and Issues: The case pertained to Ex. Lt. Selina John, who was released from the Military Nursing Service following her marriage. This practice was based on a rule applicable only to women nursing officers, which the Supreme Court scrutinized for its constitutional validity.

Gender Discrimination: The Court unequivocally stated, “Such rule was ex-facie manifestly arbitrary, as terminating employment because the woman has got married is a coarse case of gender discrimination and inequality.” This observation underscored the Court’s stance against gender-based biases in employment.

Constitutional Law: The judgment reinforced that “Laws and regulations based on gender-based bias are constitutionally impermissible,” emphasizing the right to non-discrimination and fair treatment under the Indian Constitution.

 

 

Withdrawal of Army Instruction: The Court took note of the withdrawal of Army Instruction No. 61 of 1977, which had governed the terms of service for permanent commissions in the Military Nursing Service. This withdrawal was seen as a progressive step towards eliminating gender-based employment policies.

Award of Compensation: Recognizing the injustice meted out to Ex. Lt. Selina John, the Court directed the appellants to pay her a compensation of Rs. 60,00,000, with an interest penalty for delayed payment, marking it as a full and final settlement of all claims.

Decision: The Supreme Court concluded that the termination of Ex. Lt. Selina John from the Military Nursing Service on the ground of her marriage was illegal and directed the payment of compensation, modifying the impugned judgment accordingly.

Date of Decision: February 14, 2024

Union of India & Others vs. Ex. Lt. Selina John

Latest Legal News