UDCPR | Municipal Authorities Empowered To Grant Relaxation For Recreational Open Spaces In Redevelopment Projects: Bombay High Court Appellate Court Can Enhance Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act Even Without Cross-Appeal By Claimants: Allahabad High Court State Instrumentalities Cannot Supplement Reasons For Withholding Public Money Via Affidavits Years Later: Calcutta High Court Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act | Victim's Status As 'Illegal Immigrant' Does Not Dilute Offence Or Shield Perpetrator: Bombay High Court Clubbing Of Criminal Trials | No Basis To Direct Consolidation If Connected Proceedings Have Already Concluded: Delhi High Court IBC ‘Clean Slate’ Principle Cannot Extinguish Pre-existing Crystallized Liability Under Labour Awards: Bombay High Court Section 406 IPC | 'Donation' Does Not Constitute 'Entrustment'; Criminal Prosecution Quashed In Absence Of Aggrieved Victim: Delhi High Court Failure To Deliver Possession Of Plot Constitutes "Continuous Wrong" Giving Rise To Recurrent Cause Of Action Under Consumer Protection Act: Delhi State Commission High Court Cannot Entertain Writ Petition Under Article 226 When Statutory Appellate Remedy Under Section 107 CGST Act Is Available: Gujarat High Court Appointment Of Temple Servants Is The Exclusive Prerogative Of The Hereditary Trustee: Kerala High Court Stay Of Suit Proceedings Under CPC Does Not Automatically Bar Adjudication Of Pending Temporary Injunction Application: Rajasthan High Court Section 136A MV Act | Supreme Court Directs States To Impound Vehicles With Unpaid E-Challans And Mandates Electronic Enforcement Compliance Section 115 CPC | Executing Court Cannot Dismiss Execution Petition On Hyper-Technical Grounds Regarding LRs Of Judgment Debtor: Himachal Pradesh High Court Succession Act | Will Not Validly Executed If Attesting Witness Admits Signing Without Witnessing Testator’s Signature: Madras High Court High Court Cannot Interfere Under Article 227 To Correct Errors Of Fact Or Act As An Appellate Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court Advocates Act 1961 | Bar Council Has No Power To Suspend Advocate Pending Disciplinary Enquiry: Allahabad High Court Identification Of Accused By Police Personnel In Pitch Darkness Without Prior Acquaintance Is Unreliable: Himachal Pradesh High Court Body Shaming Or Insulting Physical Appearance Does Not Per Se Constitute Offence Under Section 509 IPC: Karnataka High Court Drishyam 3 | Interim Injunction To Restrain Film Release Cannot Be Granted Without Establishing Clear Subsisting Legal Right: Madras High Court Town Planning Scheme | Statutory Notice To Occupiers Under Rule 12(2)(a) Punjab Municipal Rules Is Mandatory And Independent Of Notice To Owner: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Terminating Employment Because the Woman Has Got Married Is a Coarse Case of Gender Discrimination: Gender Discrimination in Military Nursing Service Struck Down by Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India, comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta, ruled against the wrongful termination of Ex. Lt. Selina John from the Military Nursing Service on the grounds of her marriage, marking a significant step against gender discrimination in the armed forces.

Brief on Legal Point: The crux of the judgment revolved around the issue of gender discrimination, particularly the invalidity of terminating a woman’s employment solely based on her marital status. The apex court held this practice as manifestly arbitrary and a glaring instance of gender discrimination.

Facts and Issues: The case pertained to Ex. Lt. Selina John, who was released from the Military Nursing Service following her marriage. This practice was based on a rule applicable only to women nursing officers, which the Supreme Court scrutinized for its constitutional validity.

Gender Discrimination: The Court unequivocally stated, “Such rule was ex-facie manifestly arbitrary, as terminating employment because the woman has got married is a coarse case of gender discrimination and inequality.” This observation underscored the Court’s stance against gender-based biases in employment.

Constitutional Law: The judgment reinforced that “Laws and regulations based on gender-based bias are constitutionally impermissible,” emphasizing the right to non-discrimination and fair treatment under the Indian Constitution.

 

 

Withdrawal of Army Instruction: The Court took note of the withdrawal of Army Instruction No. 61 of 1977, which had governed the terms of service for permanent commissions in the Military Nursing Service. This withdrawal was seen as a progressive step towards eliminating gender-based employment policies.

Award of Compensation: Recognizing the injustice meted out to Ex. Lt. Selina John, the Court directed the appellants to pay her a compensation of Rs. 60,00,000, with an interest penalty for delayed payment, marking it as a full and final settlement of all claims.

Decision: The Supreme Court concluded that the termination of Ex. Lt. Selina John from the Military Nursing Service on the ground of her marriage was illegal and directed the payment of compensation, modifying the impugned judgment accordingly.

Date of Decision: February 14, 2024

Union of India & Others vs. Ex. Lt. Selina John

Latest Legal News