Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

Tax on Passengers and Goods Carried by Road Validated: The Incidence of the Tax Continues to Be on the Passengers - Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India has upheld the validity of the Act of 1955, as amended by the Amendment and Validation Act of 1997, which imposes a tax on passengers and goods carried by road in motor vehicles. The judgment was delivered by a bench comprising Justices B.V. Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan.

Legislative Competence: The Court held that the Himachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly possessed the legislative competence under Article 246, read with Entry 56 of List II of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution of India, to enact the Act of 1955 and the Amendment and Validation Act of 1997.

Definition of 'Business': The Court observed that the definition of 'business' has been expanded to include not just the business of carrying passengers and goods but also any trade, commerce, manufacture, or concern. "The definition of ‘business’ as amended has the widest amplitude and includes any trade, commerce, manufacture, adventure or concern," the Court noted.

Tax Incidence: "The incidence of the tax continues to be on the passengers who travel in the buses or other vehicles of the appellants irrespective of whether they travel gratis or are paying any fare," the Court clarified.

Liability to Pay Tax: The Court ruled that the appellants should be made liable to pay the tax w.e.f. 01.04.2023, the current financial year onwards, and not for the period prior thereto.

Public Sector Organizations: The Court took into consideration that the appellants are public sector organizations engaged in hydro-power and irrigation projects, providing free transportation to their employees and their children as a welfare measure.

The judgment referred to the case of M/s Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. to clarify the definition of 'passenger' but noted that the decision would not be applicable to the present case as it turns on its own facts.

The appeals were dismissed, and the final Orders of the Division Bench of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh were affirmed, subject to the clarifications made.

This judgment is expected to have significant implications for the transportation sector, particularly for public sector organizations providing free transportation services to their employees and their children.

Date Of Decision: 06 September 2023

NHPC LTD. vs STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH    SECRETARY & ORS.              

Latest Legal News