Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal

Supreme Court's Upholds Correct Classification of Services and Highlights Exemption Eligibility under SEZ Act

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the Supreme Court of India has issued a landmark judgment reaffirming the importance of accurate classification of services for tax purposes and shedding light on the eligibility for exemptions under the Special Economic Zones (SEZ) Act. The judgment was delivered by a bench comprising Justices Abhay S. Oka and Sanjay Karol on August 14, 2023.

The case, which centered around service tax demands based on erroneous classifications, arose from four Show Cause Notices issued by the Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai-II. The notices triggered adjudication proceedings that were eventually challenged before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT).

The Supreme Court's judgment meticulously addressed various aspects of the case, including the correct classification of services rendered by the appellant. Notably, the Court observed, "Correct classification determined for the services rendered by the assessee – 'Intellectual Property Service' classification till 16th May 2008, and 'Information Technology Software' classification thereafter."

Of particular significance was the Court's focus on the eligibility for exemptions under the SEZ Act. The judgment highlighted that exemption under sub-section (2) of Section 26 of the SEZ Act could be claimed by the appellant if the Central Government had exercised its power to grant such an exemption. The Court emphasized that the exemption eligibility must be determined in accordance with the provisions of the SEZ Act and its associated rules.

Commenting on the judgment, legal experts note that the ruling reaffirms the principle that tax adjudications must be based on accurate classifications and underscores the need for adherence to exemption eligibility criteria as outlined in relevant statutes. The judgment is expected to have far-reaching implications for taxation disputes involving service classifications and exemptions under the SEZ Act.

The Supreme Court dismissed both Civil Appeal No. 4007 of 2019 and Civil Appeal No. 7155 of 2019, with no order as to costs, thereby upholding the classification determination and the insights provided on exemption eligibility.

Date of Decision: August 14, 2023

Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai­II vs M/s 3I Infotech Ltd.

Latest Legal News