Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

Supreme Court's  Judgment Upholds Correct Classification of Services and Highlights Exemption Eligibility under SEZ Act

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


New Delhi, August 15, 2023* – In a significant legal development, the Supreme Court of India has issued a landmark judgment reaffirming the importance of accurate classification of services for tax purposes and shedding light on the eligibility for exemptions under the Special Economic Zones (SEZ) Act. The judgment was delivered by a bench comprising Justices Abhay S. Oka and Sanjay Karol on August 14, 2023.

The case, which centered around service tax demands based on erroneous classifications, arose from four Show Cause Notices issued by the Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai-II. The notices triggered adjudication proceedings that were eventually challenged before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT).

The Supreme Court's judgment meticulously addressed various aspects of the case, including the correct classification of services rendered by the appellant. Notably, the Court observed, "Correct classification determined for the services rendered by the assessee – 'Intellectual Property Service' classification till 16th May 2008, and 'Information Technology Software' classification thereafter."

Of particular significance was the Court's focus on the eligibility for exemptions under the SEZ Act. The judgment highlighted that exemption under sub-section (2) of Section 26 of the SEZ Act could be claimed by the appellant if the Central Government had exercised its power to grant such an exemption. The Court emphasized that the exemption eligibility must be determined in accordance with the provisions of the SEZ Act and its associated rules.

Commenting on the judgment, legal experts note that the ruling reaffirms the principle that tax adjudications must be based on accurate classifications and underscores the need for adherence to exemption eligibility criteria as outlined in relevant statutes. The judgment is expected to have far-reaching implications for taxation disputes involving service classifications and exemptions under the SEZ Act.

The Supreme Court dismissed both Civil Appeal No. 4007 of 2019 and Civil Appeal No. 7155 of 2019, with no order as to costs, thereby upholding the classification determination and the insights provided on exemption eligibility.

This landmark judgment brings clarity to the intricate legal aspects surrounding service tax classifications and exemptions, setting a precedent for future cases involving similar issues.

Date of Decision: AUGUST 9, 2023

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs HARYANA WAREHOUSING CORPORATION     

Latest Legal News