CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness Employee Cannot Switch Cadre At His Sweet Will After Accepting Promotion: J&K High Court Rejects Claim For Retrospective Assistant Registrar Appointment Anticipatory Bail Cannot Expire With Charge-Sheet: Supreme Court Reiterates Liberty Is Not Bound by Procedural Milestones Order II Rule 2 Cannot Eclipse Amendment Power Under Order VI Rule 17: MP High Court Refuses to Stall Will-Based Title Suit Grounds of Arrest Must Be Personal, Not Formal – But Detailed Allegations Suffice: Kerala High Court Upholds Arrest in Sabarimala Gold Misappropriation Case Grounds of Arrest Are Not a Ritual – They Are a Constitutional Mandate Under Article 22(1): Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Arrest for Non-Supply of Written Grounds Sect. 25 NDPS | Mere Ownership Cannot Fasten NDPS Liability – ‘Knowingly Permits’ Must Be Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt: MP High Court Section 308 CrPC | Revocation of Pardon Is Not Automatic on Prosecutor’s Certificate: Karnataka High Court Joint Family and Ancestral Property Are Alien to Mohammedan Law: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Injunction Right to Health Cannot Wait for Endless Consultations: Supreme Court Pulls Up FSSAI Over Delay in Front-of-Pack Warning Labels If A Son Dies Intestate Leaving Wife And Children, The Mother Has No Share: Karnataka High Court

"Supreme Court Upholds Sale Deed Terms in Land Ownership Case: Dismisses Appeal "

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has dismissed an appeal concerning a land ownership dispute, emphasizing the sanctity of the original terms of a sale deed. The bench, comprising Justices Abhay S. Oka and Pankaj Mithal, delivered their verdict on Civil Appeal No. 9098 of 2013, involving the estate of Kanwar Raj Singh and the legal representatives of Gejo.

The case revolved around a piece of land measuring 71 kanals 8 marlas. The appellants contested the interpretation of a sale deed executed by their predecessor, Kanwar Raj Singh, claiming that it conveyed only a 1/3rd share of the property, not the entirety. This assertion was based on an interpolation made in the sale deed before its registration.

Justice Oka, in the judgment, observed, “The sale deed was registered with the interpolation made about the description/area of the property sold. The first defendant admittedly made the said interpolation after it was executed but before it was registered.” The Court found that the unilateral alterations made to the sale deed after its execution and without the buyer’s consent were invalid.

The judgment further clarified the legal standing of such documents, stating, “In terms of Section 47 of the Registration Act, a registered sale deed where entire consideration is paid would operate from the date of its execution.” Thus, the Supreme Court restored the original interpretation of the sale deed as it existed at the time of its execution.

This ruling reaffirms the legal principle that the description of the property in a registered sale deed prevails, especially when the entire consideration has been paid on the date of its execution. The decision has significant implications for property law and the interpretation of sale deeds in India.

The Supreme Court, in its ruling, also referenced the Constitution Bench decision in Ram Saran Lall v. Domini Kuer, supporting their interpretation of Section 47 of the Registration Act, 1908. The judgment concluded with the dismissal of the appeal, with no order as to costs, thereby upholding the High Court’s decision to restore the decree of the Trial Court.

Date of Decision: 2nd January 2024

KANWAR RAJ SINGH (D) TH. LRS. VS GEJO. (D) TH.LRS & ORS

 

Latest Legal News