Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Sudden Quarrel over Mound of Earth — Not Murder but Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court Eligibility Flows from Birth, Not a Certificate Date: Delhi High Court Strikes Down Rule Fixing Arbitrary Cut-Off for OBC-NCL Certificates in CAPF (AC) Recruitment Bar Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Invoked Where Specific Performance Was Legally Premature Due To Statutory Impediments: P&H High Court Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity

"Supreme Court Upholds Sale Deed Terms in Land Ownership Case: Dismisses Appeal "

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has dismissed an appeal concerning a land ownership dispute, emphasizing the sanctity of the original terms of a sale deed. The bench, comprising Justices Abhay S. Oka and Pankaj Mithal, delivered their verdict on Civil Appeal No. 9098 of 2013, involving the estate of Kanwar Raj Singh and the legal representatives of Gejo.

The case revolved around a piece of land measuring 71 kanals 8 marlas. The appellants contested the interpretation of a sale deed executed by their predecessor, Kanwar Raj Singh, claiming that it conveyed only a 1/3rd share of the property, not the entirety. This assertion was based on an interpolation made in the sale deed before its registration.

Justice Oka, in the judgment, observed, “The sale deed was registered with the interpolation made about the description/area of the property sold. The first defendant admittedly made the said interpolation after it was executed but before it was registered.” The Court found that the unilateral alterations made to the sale deed after its execution and without the buyer’s consent were invalid.

The judgment further clarified the legal standing of such documents, stating, “In terms of Section 47 of the Registration Act, a registered sale deed where entire consideration is paid would operate from the date of its execution.” Thus, the Supreme Court restored the original interpretation of the sale deed as it existed at the time of its execution.

This ruling reaffirms the legal principle that the description of the property in a registered sale deed prevails, especially when the entire consideration has been paid on the date of its execution. The decision has significant implications for property law and the interpretation of sale deeds in India.

The Supreme Court, in its ruling, also referenced the Constitution Bench decision in Ram Saran Lall v. Domini Kuer, supporting their interpretation of Section 47 of the Registration Act, 1908. The judgment concluded with the dismissal of the appeal, with no order as to costs, thereby upholding the High Court’s decision to restore the decree of the Trial Court.

Date of Decision: 2nd January 2024

KANWAR RAJ SINGH (D) TH. LRS. VS GEJO. (D) TH.LRS & ORS

 

Latest Legal News