Procedural Lapses and Prolonged Incarceration Justify Bail Under NDPS Act: Bombay High Court Mere Non-Deposit of Sale Balance Is Not Fatal to Specific Performance Claims: Andhra High Court Justice Requires Insurance Company to Pay and Recover: Calcutta High Court on Fatal Accident Case IBC Moratorium Nullifies Vicarious Liability Under Section 138 of NI Act: Delhi High Court Fraud Unravels All: Partition Decree Set Aside for Suppressing Rights of Co-Owners: Madras High Court Matters of Evidence Must Be Examined at Trial, Not Preemptively Quashed: Kerala High Court Declines Quashment Leave Encashment Is a Property Right and Cannot Be Denied Without Statutory Authority: Gujarat High Court Widow's Right to Deceased Husband’s Property Ceases Upon Remarriage Before 1956: Himachal Pradesh High Court No Reassessment of Departmental Inquiries by Courts, Orders Interest on Delayed GPF Payments: P&H High Court Investigations Initiated Before BNSS, 2023, Must Proceed Under Cr.P.C., 1973: Rajasthan High Court Third-Party Objector’s Locus Standi in Criminal Cases Must Have a Bona Fide Connection: Madhya Pradesh High Court Amendments After Trial Commences Barred Without Demonstration of Due Diligence - Contradictory Claims Cannot Be Permitted: Punjab & Haryana High Court Double Presumption of Innocence in Appeals Against Acquittals Must Be Respected: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Acquittal in Rape and Carnal Intercourse Case Provisional Release Not Prejudice Revenue Interests: Kerala High Court Permits Provisional Release of Seized Goods Under GST Act GST Registration Cannot Be Cancelled Retrospectively Without Objective Criteria:  Delhi High Court Neither the Statutory Framework nor Lease Terms Compel Conveyance of Property: Supreme Court Owner Can Avoid Confiscation Under NDPS by Proving Lack of Knowledge or Connivance in Illicit Use of Vehicle: Supreme Court Court is Expert of Experts: High Court Upholds Right to Rebuttal Evidence in Will Dispute Exceptional Circumstances Warrant Use of Inherent Powers to Reduce Sentences in Non-Compoundable Offenses: Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on CSIR Promotion Row, Says "Promotion Denial to Respondent  was Incorrect"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court of India, in a recent judgment, affirmed the decision of the Punjab and Haryana High Court concerning the promotion disputes within the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR). The apex court, led by Justices Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Sandeep Mehta, upheld the High Court's ruling that reversed the promotion of respondent nos. 2 and 3, deeming them ineligible under the CSIR Administrative Services (Recruitment & Promotion) Rules, 1982.

The dispute arose when the Director General of CSIR contested the High Court's decision, arguing that respondent no. 1 was not eligible for promotion to the post of Under Secretary due to not independently performing the duties of a Section Officer. The Supreme Court, in its judgment, stated, "We are of the opinion that the action of the appellant in denying promotion to respondent no. 1 upon the post of Under Secretary was rightly reversed by the High Court."

The apex court carefully analyzed the eligibility criteria as stipulated under the CSIR rules. It was noted that respondent nos. 2 and 3 were promoted based on certificates indicating their experience as Section Officers, but without formal appointments. In contrast, respondent no. 1's formal appointment as Section Officer in 2004 was acknowledged and undisputed.

The Supreme Court also addressed the appellant's merit-based promotion argument. It clarified that the primary focus was on meeting the eligibility criteria, asserting, "Thus, there was no impediment for the promotion by selection of respondent No.1 to the post of Under Secretary under the statutory rules."

The judgment, delivered on January 29, 2024, concluded with the dismissal of the appeals filed by CSIR, stating, "In view of the above, we are of the firm view that the impugned judgment rendered by the High Court does not require any interference."

Date of Decision: 29th January 2024

DIRECTOR GENERAL, COUNCIL OF SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH(CSIR) VS J.K. PRASHAR & ORS.

 

Similar News