High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Divorce Cannot Be Granted Merely on WhatsApp Chats: Bombay High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Decree Based on Unproved Electronic Evidence State Cannot Demand Settlement Amount Yet Withhold Legitimate Refund: Bombay High Court Strikes Down MVAT Settlement Order Surveyor’s Report Is Not Sacrosanct; Arbitral Award Ignoring Vital Evidence Is Perverse: Delhi High Court Sets Aside Insurance Arbitration Award When Victim Lives Under Exclusive Control Of Accused, Burden Shifts To Accused To Explain What Happened: Calcutta High Court Medical Evidence Clearly Indicating Suicide Cannot Be Overlooked, Prosecution Must Prove Homicidal Death Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Andhra Pradesh High Court 'Candidates Acted With Full Knowledge of Consequences': Kerala High Court Reverses Order for Refund of 10% Exit Fee in Medical PG Mop-Up Admissions Dispensing with Departmental Inquiry Without Material is Arbitrary: Supreme Court Sets Aside Dismissal of Delhi Police Constable Power Of Attorney Holder Authorized To Enforce Pre-Emption Right Can File Suit, Death Of Principal Does Not Bar Legal Heirs: Orissa High Court Government Servant Convicted In Criminal Case Can Be Dismissed Without Departmental Enquiry: Tripura High Court Upholds Teacher’s Dismissal RTI Cannot Be Used To Bypass Statutory Bar On Police Case Diaries: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Penalty Against Police Officers Externment Cannot Be Based On Police Report And Stale Cases: Madhya Pradesh High Court Quashes District Magistrate’s Order Even Exonerated Accused Can Be Summoned During Trial: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Summoning Under Section 358 BNSS Benefit of Doubt Acquittal Not Equal to Honourable Acquittal: Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Police Constable Candidate Madras High Court Allows NEET-Failed Student To Appear In CBSE Class XII Mathematics Exam After Last-Minute Subject Switch By Parents Salary of Parents Cannot Be Used to Deny OBC Non-Creamy Layer Status in Absence of Post Equivalence: Supreme Court Father Who Rapes Minor Daughter Cannot Seek Leniency: Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment Construction Of Toilet Is Bare Necessity For Proper Use Of Premises, Expression "Own Use" Not Confined To Landlord's Personal Physical Use: Calcutta High Court 353 IPC | Conviction Cannot Rest On Uncorroborated Testimony Of Sole Witness When Other Evidence Contradicts Occurrence: Delhi High Court Upholds Acquittal 250 BNSS | 60-Day Discharge Period Is Procedural, Does Not Extinguish Accused's Right To Seek Discharge: Gujarat High Court Section 45 PMLA Cannot Become an Instrument of Endless Incarceration: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in ₹18 Crore Scholarship Scam Case Land Acquisition — Heirs Who Slept on Rights for 23 Years Cannot Claim Ignorance to Revive Dead Challenge: Karnataka High Court Institutional Hearing Is No Violation of Natural Justice: Kerala High Court Upholds BPCL’s Termination of Decades-Old Petroleum Dealership Witnesses Not Expected To Recount Past Incidents With Mathematical Precision, Minor Contradictions Don't Demolish Credibility: Orissa High Court If a Suit Is Ex Facie Barred by Limitation, the Court Has No Choice but to Dismiss It: P&H High Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Decision, Dismisses Appeal Over Land Allotment

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has dismissed the appeals filed by Purushottam Bagh Sahkari Awas Samiti Ltd., thereby upholding the High Court's judgment dated 17th July 2023. The apex court found no merit in the society's allegations against the late Krishna Pal Singh and his successors, Sri Shobhan Pal Singh and Anr., regarding the violation of the society's bye-laws in a land allotment case.

The society had alleged that Krishna Pal Singh obtained the land by submitting a false affidavit, claiming he did not own any property in the area of the society's operation. However, the Supreme Court noted that the society failed to provide any evidence to substantiate its allegations.

The judgment, delivered by a bench comprising Justices Abhay S. Oka and Pankaj Mithal on September 4, 2023, emphasized that the burden of proof lay with the society to prove the violation of its bye-laws. The court found that the society had not met this burden and thus dismissed the appeals with no orders as to costs.

The case had initially gone through arbitration, where an award was made declaring the sale deed null and void. This award was later challenged in the High Court, which set aside both the award and the appellate order, leading to the society's appeal in the Supreme Court.

The ruling is seen as a significant affirmation of the importance of providing substantial evidence when challenging property allotments, especially in cooperative societies.

Date of Decision: SEPTEMBER 04, 2023

PURUSHOTTAM BAGH SAHKARI  AWAS SAMITI LTD. vs SRI SHOBHAN PAL SINGH AND ANR. ETC. 

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/04-Sep-2023_Purshottam_Bagh_Vs_Sri_Shobban.pdf"]

Latest Legal News