Sold Property During Pending Appeal, Defied Court Order: Andhra Pradesh High Court Sends Man To Jail For Contempt Hostile Witness Cannot Erase a Bribe Demand Already Made on Record: Supreme Court Restores Conviction of Ration Officer Three Decades of Unpaid Wages: Supreme Court Strips Gannon Dunkerley of Control Over Sick Company's Assets, Appoints Administrator to Pay Workers by August 2026 Gram Nyayalaya Cannot Touch Family Court's Maintenance Orders — Allahabad High Court Draws the Line Caste Abuse Allegation at Village Jatra Is Counter-Blast to Earlier Machete Attack: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail Despite SC/ST Act Bar Contributory Negligence | Not Wearing a Helmet Does Not Mean the Victim Caused the Accident: Madras High Court Air Force Can't Punish Officer After Criminal Court Sets Him Free: Supreme Court Overturns 30-Year-Old Dismissal Written Statement Without Affidavit of Admission/Denial: Non-Est Filing or Curable Defect? Delhi High Court Refers Conflicting Views to Larger Bench Bank's Negligence Killed Cheque Bounce Case Before It Could Begin: Supreme Court Rules Section 138 Remedy Lost Due to Stale Cheques Bank Letting Your Cheques Go Stale Is Deficiency in Service: Supreme Court Victim Has Locus To Request Court To Summon Witnesses Under Section 311 CrPC In State Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Benefit Of Probation Act Available Even If Offender Is Sentenced Solely To Fine: Supreme Court Reporting Registration Of FIR Based On Public Records Does Not Violate Right To Privacy: Sikkim High Court CBSE Cannot Cancel Class XII Results Based on Similar MCQ Answers Alone Without Any Report of Malpractice From Examination Centre: Orissa High Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Decision, Dismisses Appeal Over Land Allotment

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has dismissed the appeals filed by Purushottam Bagh Sahkari Awas Samiti Ltd., thereby upholding the High Court's judgment dated 17th July 2023. The apex court found no merit in the society's allegations against the late Krishna Pal Singh and his successors, Sri Shobhan Pal Singh and Anr., regarding the violation of the society's bye-laws in a land allotment case.

The society had alleged that Krishna Pal Singh obtained the land by submitting a false affidavit, claiming he did not own any property in the area of the society's operation. However, the Supreme Court noted that the society failed to provide any evidence to substantiate its allegations.

The judgment, delivered by a bench comprising Justices Abhay S. Oka and Pankaj Mithal on September 4, 2023, emphasized that the burden of proof lay with the society to prove the violation of its bye-laws. The court found that the society had not met this burden and thus dismissed the appeals with no orders as to costs.

The case had initially gone through arbitration, where an award was made declaring the sale deed null and void. This award was later challenged in the High Court, which set aside both the award and the appellate order, leading to the society's appeal in the Supreme Court.

The ruling is seen as a significant affirmation of the importance of providing substantial evidence when challenging property allotments, especially in cooperative societies.

Date of Decision: SEPTEMBER 04, 2023

PURUSHOTTAM BAGH SAHKARI  AWAS SAMITI LTD. vs SRI SHOBHAN PAL SINGH AND ANR. ETC. 

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/04-Sep-2023_Purshottam_Bagh_Vs_Sri_Shobban.pdf"]

Latest Legal News