MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Supreme Court Upholds Disallowance of Deduction on Foreign Exchange Gains Under Section 80HHC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India today dismissed the appeals filed by Shah Originals against the decision of the High Court concerning the disallowance of deduction under Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act for gains arising from foreign exchange fluctuations in Export Earners’ Foreign Currency (EEFC) accounts. This decision reaffirms the strict interpretation of income tax provisions relating to deductions.

The Bench, comprising Justices B.V. Nagarathna and S.V.N. Bhatti, emphasized the essence of the legal principle involved. The Court stated, “In interpreting a section in a taxing statute, the question is not at what transaction the section is aimed, but what transaction its language fairly and squarely hits.” This observation underpins the Court’s approach in interpreting the provisions of the Income Tax Act.

The appeals by Shah Originals contested the High Court’s decision, which disallowed the deduction claimed under Section 80HHC for gains earned due to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates in the company’s EEFC account. The Supreme Court, in its detailed judgment, held that these gains do not partake in the character of profits of the business of the assessee from exports and, therefore, cannot be included in the computation of deduction under Section 80HHC of the Act.

Highlighting the nature of EEFC accounts, the Court observed that maintaining such an account is neither mandatory nor incidental to the export activity but is purely optional. Thus, the gains earned from foreign exchange fluctuations in these accounts cannot be treated as profits derived from the export business for deduction under Section 80HHC.

The Court’s decision sets a precedent in the interpretation of the term ‘derived from’ within the context of the Income Tax Act, underscoring that income considered under this section must have a direct nexus with the export of goods and not merely be attributable to it.

This ruling is expected to have widespread implications for businesses engaged in exports and their approach to claiming deductions under the Income Tax Act, particularly concerning foreign exchange earnings and fluctuations.

 

Date of Decision: 21st November 2023

Shah Originals VS Commissioner of Income

Latest Legal News