Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

Supreme Court Upholds Disallowance of Deduction on Foreign Exchange Gains Under Section 80HHC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India today dismissed the appeals filed by Shah Originals against the decision of the High Court concerning the disallowance of deduction under Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act for gains arising from foreign exchange fluctuations in Export Earners’ Foreign Currency (EEFC) accounts. This decision reaffirms the strict interpretation of income tax provisions relating to deductions.

The Bench, comprising Justices B.V. Nagarathna and S.V.N. Bhatti, emphasized the essence of the legal principle involved. The Court stated, “In interpreting a section in a taxing statute, the question is not at what transaction the section is aimed, but what transaction its language fairly and squarely hits.” This observation underpins the Court’s approach in interpreting the provisions of the Income Tax Act.

The appeals by Shah Originals contested the High Court’s decision, which disallowed the deduction claimed under Section 80HHC for gains earned due to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates in the company’s EEFC account. The Supreme Court, in its detailed judgment, held that these gains do not partake in the character of profits of the business of the assessee from exports and, therefore, cannot be included in the computation of deduction under Section 80HHC of the Act.

Highlighting the nature of EEFC accounts, the Court observed that maintaining such an account is neither mandatory nor incidental to the export activity but is purely optional. Thus, the gains earned from foreign exchange fluctuations in these accounts cannot be treated as profits derived from the export business for deduction under Section 80HHC.

The Court’s decision sets a precedent in the interpretation of the term ‘derived from’ within the context of the Income Tax Act, underscoring that income considered under this section must have a direct nexus with the export of goods and not merely be attributable to it.

This ruling is expected to have widespread implications for businesses engaged in exports and their approach to claiming deductions under the Income Tax Act, particularly concerning foreign exchange earnings and fluctuations.

 

Date of Decision: 21st November 2023

Shah Originals VS Commissioner of Income

Latest Legal News