Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Supreme Court Upholds Disallowance of Deduction on Foreign Exchange Gains Under Section 80HHC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India today dismissed the appeals filed by Shah Originals against the decision of the High Court concerning the disallowance of deduction under Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act for gains arising from foreign exchange fluctuations in Export Earners’ Foreign Currency (EEFC) accounts. This decision reaffirms the strict interpretation of income tax provisions relating to deductions.

The Bench, comprising Justices B.V. Nagarathna and S.V.N. Bhatti, emphasized the essence of the legal principle involved. The Court stated, “In interpreting a section in a taxing statute, the question is not at what transaction the section is aimed, but what transaction its language fairly and squarely hits.” This observation underpins the Court’s approach in interpreting the provisions of the Income Tax Act.

The appeals by Shah Originals contested the High Court’s decision, which disallowed the deduction claimed under Section 80HHC for gains earned due to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates in the company’s EEFC account. The Supreme Court, in its detailed judgment, held that these gains do not partake in the character of profits of the business of the assessee from exports and, therefore, cannot be included in the computation of deduction under Section 80HHC of the Act.

Highlighting the nature of EEFC accounts, the Court observed that maintaining such an account is neither mandatory nor incidental to the export activity but is purely optional. Thus, the gains earned from foreign exchange fluctuations in these accounts cannot be treated as profits derived from the export business for deduction under Section 80HHC.

The Court’s decision sets a precedent in the interpretation of the term ‘derived from’ within the context of the Income Tax Act, underscoring that income considered under this section must have a direct nexus with the export of goods and not merely be attributable to it.

This ruling is expected to have widespread implications for businesses engaged in exports and their approach to claiming deductions under the Income Tax Act, particularly concerning foreign exchange earnings and fluctuations.

 

Date of Decision: 21st November 2023

Shah Originals VS Commissioner of Income

Latest Legal News