CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness Employee Cannot Switch Cadre At His Sweet Will After Accepting Promotion: J&K High Court Rejects Claim For Retrospective Assistant Registrar Appointment Anticipatory Bail Cannot Expire With Charge-Sheet: Supreme Court Reiterates Liberty Is Not Bound by Procedural Milestones Order II Rule 2 Cannot Eclipse Amendment Power Under Order VI Rule 17: MP High Court Refuses to Stall Will-Based Title Suit Grounds of Arrest Must Be Personal, Not Formal – But Detailed Allegations Suffice: Kerala High Court Upholds Arrest in Sabarimala Gold Misappropriation Case Grounds of Arrest Are Not a Ritual – They Are a Constitutional Mandate Under Article 22(1): Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Arrest for Non-Supply of Written Grounds Sect. 25 NDPS | Mere Ownership Cannot Fasten NDPS Liability – ‘Knowingly Permits’ Must Be Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt: MP High Court Section 308 CrPC | Revocation of Pardon Is Not Automatic on Prosecutor’s Certificate: Karnataka High Court Joint Family and Ancestral Property Are Alien to Mohammedan Law: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Injunction Right to Health Cannot Wait for Endless Consultations: Supreme Court Pulls Up FSSAI Over Delay in Front-of-Pack Warning Labels If A Son Dies Intestate Leaving Wife And Children, The Mother Has No Share: Karnataka High Court

Supreme Court Stays Trial Proceedings in West Bengal; Cites Threats and Intimidation to Officers and Witnesses

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the Supreme Court of India, presided by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, has ordered a stay on the trial proceedings of multiple cases in the State of West Bengal. The apex court’s decision came after hearing a transfer petition filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), citing threats and intimidation to officers, officials, complainants, advocates, and witnesses involved in these cases.

The crucial legal point at the heart of this judgement is the safeguarding of the course of justice from external influences and threats. The Supreme Court has recognized the importance of ensuring a free and fair trial, unimpeded by fear or favor.

The CBI’s petition, Diary No. 51357/2023, highlights the concerns of safety and the obstruction of justice due to alleged threats and intimidation towards various stakeholders in the ongoing trials within West Bengal. This includes specific references to a complaint dated July 13, 2022, made by a lawyer of the petitioner, and recommendations from a report by the National Human Rights Commission dated July 12, 2021.

The Court carefully assessed the submissions and material presented, including the alarming allegations and the NHRC’s recommendations for trials investigated by the CBI to be conducted outside West Bengal. Justice Karol noted the gravity of the situation and the need to ensure the integrity of the judicial process.

Based on these considerations, the Supreme Court has directed the stay of further proceedings of the trials referred to in the petition. It issued a notice to all respondents, returnable on March 11, 2024, and ordered the Director General of Police, West Bengal, to ensure compliance with this order and file a personal affidavit reporting compliance. Additionally, the Court directed that respondents be served notice through multiple channels, including local newspaper publication.

Date of Decision: 14-02-2024

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION VS THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.   

Latest Legal News