Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

Supreme Court Shows Leniency, Grants Probation to 62-year-old Woman Convicted for Obstructing Public Servants

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India exhibited leniency in its sentencing by granting probation to a 62-year-old woman, Razia Khan, who was convicted for offences under Sections 333, 353, and 451 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The case, Criminal Appeal No. 2259 of 2023, had been closely watched by legal experts due to the appellant's age and the passage of over thirty years since the incident occurred.

In the judgment delivered by Justice Abhay S. Oka, the Court considered the nature of the offence and various factors surrounding the case. The appellant, who claimed to be a social worker and a member of a political party, was found guilty of misbehaving with a public servant (PW-1) and obstructing her and another public servant (PW-6) from discharging their official duties during an incident that took place on 1st December 1992.

The Court took note of the prolonged trial and appeal period, during which the appellant had been out on bail. Justice Oka emphasized, "Considering the nature of the offence, we are of the view that the appellant deserves to be shown leniency when it comes to the substantive sentence."

Accordingly, the Court decided to grant the appellant the benefit of probation, taking into account her age and the absence of any objectionable activity during the extended trial period. The sentences for the three offences were modified as follows:

  1. For the offence punishable under Section 333 of the IPC, the appellant was sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for one month and pay a fine of ₹30,000 within one month.
  2. For the offence punishable under Section 353 of the IPC, the appellant was fined ₹20,000 within one month.
  3. For the offence punishable under Section 451 of the IPC, the appellant was sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for one month and pay a fine of ₹25,000 within one month.

The Court ordered that in default of payment of the fines, the appellant would undergo simple imprisonment for 15 days.

The judgment, delivered on 3rd August 2023, has sparked discussions among legal circles about the appropriate balance between showing leniency and ensuring justice is served in cases involving elderly convicts with no previous criminal record. The Court's decision to grant probation in this case highlights the importance of considering individual circumstances and the passage of time in determining suitable sentencing.

As part of the fine amount, ₹25,000 will be paid to the injured witness, PW-1 Ms. Sajni Batra, by way of compensation, while the remaining fine will go to the State.

The Court granted the appellant one month to surrender before the Trial Court to serve the sentences. This judgment stands as a notable example of the Indian judiciary's commitment to administering justice with compassion and sensitivity towards unique case scenarios.

Date of Decision: August 3, 2023

Razia Khan vs The State of M.P.             

Latest Legal News