Courts Cannot Rewrite Contracts or Dictate Economic Policy: Supreme Court Strikes Down Madras HC’s Intervention in Formula 4 Racing Event Advocates Must Uphold Integrity; Mere Name Lending Without Active Participation Amounts to Misconduct: Supreme Court Contempt Jurisdiction Should Protect Justice, Not Judges' Personal Dignity: PH High Court Reaffirms Limits of Criminal Contempt Amendments to KPBR 2019 Ensure Compliance in Church Construction: Kerala High Court Dismisses Challenges Mere Allegation of Fraud Without Specific Pleadings and Evidence Cannot Reopen a Concluded Judgment: Delhi High Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Petitions Alleging Police Harassment and Seeking Protection for Whistle-blowers Violations of Conditions Will Not Be Tolerated: Kerla High Court Cancels Bail, Citing Threats to Victim Public Infrastructure Cannot Be Altered for Private Convenience Without Compelling Reasons: Punjab and Haryana High Court Refused To Relocation of Foot Over Bridge Accident Claim | Compensation Must Be Just, Not a Mere Mathematical Exercise –  Must Reflect Real Hardships: Supreme Court Accident Claim | Compensation Must Reflect the True Impact of Disability on One’s Life and Livelihood: Supreme Court Accident Claim | Compensation for Foreign Earnings Must Reflect Exchange Rate on Date of Claim Petition: Supreme Court A Conviction Under Section 366A IPC Cannot Stand Without Conclusive Proof That the Victim Was a Minor:  Supreme Court Integrity of a Public Servant Must Be Beyond Suspicion: Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Former Indian Airlines Official for Forgery and Corruption Minor in Live-In Relationship Deemed 'Child in Need of Care' by High Court, Protection Ordered Under Juvenile Justice Act Cheque Signed, Sealed, and Bounced – No Escape from Liability: Delhi High Court Right to Defend Includes Right to Inspect Documents: Calcutta High Court Overrules Trial Court's Rejection of Inspection Petition Court Cannot Tinker with Finalized Consolidation Scheme Under Section 42: Punjab and Haryana High Court Remarriage During Appeal Period is Risky, But Not Void: Andhra Pradesh High Court

Supreme Court Shows Leniency, Grants Probation to 62-year-old Woman Convicted for Obstructing Public Servants

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India exhibited leniency in its sentencing by granting probation to a 62-year-old woman, Razia Khan, who was convicted for offences under Sections 333, 353, and 451 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The case, Criminal Appeal No. 2259 of 2023, had been closely watched by legal experts due to the appellant's age and the passage of over thirty years since the incident occurred.

In the judgment delivered by Justice Abhay S. Oka, the Court considered the nature of the offence and various factors surrounding the case. The appellant, who claimed to be a social worker and a member of a political party, was found guilty of misbehaving with a public servant (PW-1) and obstructing her and another public servant (PW-6) from discharging their official duties during an incident that took place on 1st December 1992.

The Court took note of the prolonged trial and appeal period, during which the appellant had been out on bail. Justice Oka emphasized, "Considering the nature of the offence, we are of the view that the appellant deserves to be shown leniency when it comes to the substantive sentence."

Accordingly, the Court decided to grant the appellant the benefit of probation, taking into account her age and the absence of any objectionable activity during the extended trial period. The sentences for the three offences were modified as follows:

  1. For the offence punishable under Section 333 of the IPC, the appellant was sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for one month and pay a fine of ₹30,000 within one month.
  2. For the offence punishable under Section 353 of the IPC, the appellant was fined ₹20,000 within one month.
  3. For the offence punishable under Section 451 of the IPC, the appellant was sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for one month and pay a fine of ₹25,000 within one month.

The Court ordered that in default of payment of the fines, the appellant would undergo simple imprisonment for 15 days.

The judgment, delivered on 3rd August 2023, has sparked discussions among legal circles about the appropriate balance between showing leniency and ensuring justice is served in cases involving elderly convicts with no previous criminal record. The Court's decision to grant probation in this case highlights the importance of considering individual circumstances and the passage of time in determining suitable sentencing.

As part of the fine amount, ₹25,000 will be paid to the injured witness, PW-1 Ms. Sajni Batra, by way of compensation, while the remaining fine will go to the State.

The Court granted the appellant one month to surrender before the Trial Court to serve the sentences. This judgment stands as a notable example of the Indian judiciary's commitment to administering justice with compassion and sensitivity towards unique case scenarios.

Date of Decision: August 3, 2023

Razia Khan vs The State of M.P.             

Similar News