Procedural Lapses and Prolonged Incarceration Justify Bail Under NDPS Act: Bombay High Court Mere Non-Deposit of Sale Balance Is Not Fatal to Specific Performance Claims: Andhra High Court Justice Requires Insurance Company to Pay and Recover: Calcutta High Court on Fatal Accident Case IBC Moratorium Nullifies Vicarious Liability Under Section 138 of NI Act: Delhi High Court Fraud Unravels All: Partition Decree Set Aside for Suppressing Rights of Co-Owners: Madras High Court Matters of Evidence Must Be Examined at Trial, Not Preemptively Quashed: Kerala High Court Declines Quashment Leave Encashment Is a Property Right and Cannot Be Denied Without Statutory Authority: Gujarat High Court Widow's Right to Deceased Husband’s Property Ceases Upon Remarriage Before 1956: Himachal Pradesh High Court No Reassessment of Departmental Inquiries by Courts, Orders Interest on Delayed GPF Payments: P&H High Court Investigations Initiated Before BNSS, 2023, Must Proceed Under Cr.P.C., 1973: Rajasthan High Court Third-Party Objector’s Locus Standi in Criminal Cases Must Have a Bona Fide Connection: Madhya Pradesh High Court Amendments After Trial Commences Barred Without Demonstration of Due Diligence - Contradictory Claims Cannot Be Permitted: Punjab & Haryana High Court Double Presumption of Innocence in Appeals Against Acquittals Must Be Respected: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Acquittal in Rape and Carnal Intercourse Case Provisional Release Not Prejudice Revenue Interests: Kerala High Court Permits Provisional Release of Seized Goods Under GST Act GST Registration Cannot Be Cancelled Retrospectively Without Objective Criteria:  Delhi High Court Neither the Statutory Framework nor Lease Terms Compel Conveyance of Property: Supreme Court Owner Can Avoid Confiscation Under NDPS by Proving Lack of Knowledge or Connivance in Illicit Use of Vehicle: Supreme Court Court is Expert of Experts: High Court Upholds Right to Rebuttal Evidence in Will Dispute Exceptional Circumstances Warrant Use of Inherent Powers to Reduce Sentences in Non-Compoundable Offenses: Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court's Dismissal of 1987 Land Acquisition Writ Petition; Remits Matter for Hearing on Merits

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant turn of events, the Supreme Court of India, in its recent judgment dated 29th January 2024, set aside the orders of the High Court of Uttarakhand which had dismissed a writ petition concerning land acquisition dating back to 1987. The apex court has remitted the matter back to the High Court for a decision on its merits, providing relief to the appellant, J.N. Puri.

The appeal in the Supreme Court arose from the dismissal of Writ Petition(M/B) No. 156/1987 by the High Court for want of prosecution in 1992, and the subsequent rejection of restoration and review applications. The appellant, claiming to still be in possession of the disputed land, had approached the apex court seeking redressal.

The Bench, comprising Justices B.R. Gavai and Sandeep Mehta, observed, “In the facts and circumstances noted above and more particularly the fact that the appellant still claims to be in possession of the land under acquisition, we feel that the writ petition preferred by the appellant should have been heard and decided on merits.”

Addressing the delay in the restoration application, the Court found that the High Court had incorrectly held that the restoration application was submitted with a delay of seven years. “As a matter of fact, the application for restoration was filed within a period of one month which fact has been admitted at para 5 of the counter affidavit filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh/Uttarakhand(respondent no. 1). The said application was never considered on merits,” the judgment read.

The Supreme Court has allowed the appeals, setting aside the orders of the High Court. It directed the High Court of Uttarakhand to restore the writ petition and decide the same on merits expeditiously after giving an opportunity of hearing to all concerned. This decision underscores the importance of hearing matters on their substantive merits, especially in long-standing disputes involving land acquisition.

J.N. Puri, the appellant in this case, has been engaged in a legal battle over his land since 1987. The respondents include the State of Uttar Pradesh (now State of Uttarakhand) and others.

Date of Decision: 29 January 2024

J.N. Puri V State Of Uttar Pradesh (Now State Of Uttarakhand) & Ors.

 

Similar News