Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail Rejection, Directs Reconsideration in NDPS Case

In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set aside the rejection of a bail application and directed its reconsideration in a case involving alleged offenses under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

The appellant, Sebil Elanjimpally, had filed a second bail application after the earlier attempt was unsuccessful. The appellant has been in custody for nearly three years. The impugned order cited the non-surrender of a co-accused, who had been released on bail, as the primary reason for rejecting the appellant's bail application. However, the Supreme Court found this reasoning inadequate, stating that the actions of the co-accused cannot be attributed to the appellant.

Taking into account the appellant's father's recent surgery, the Supreme Court emphasized the need for expeditious disposal of the case. The court has directed the High Court to reconsider the bail application (BLAPL No. 6803/2022) and pass appropriate orders, considering that charges have been framed and numerous prosecution witnesses are proposed to be examined.

The Supreme Court further requested the High Court to dispose of the matter at the earliest, preferably within a period of two months from the date of the production of the copy of the order. The decision highlights the urgency in resolving the case and provides an opportunity for the appellant to seek bail.

Date of Decision: May 18, 2023

SEBIL ELANJIMPALLY    VS THE STATE OF ODISHA