Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Supreme Court Bars Post-Divorce Maintenance Claims When Wife Voluntarily Waived Maintenance In Settlement Agreement Advocate Is An Officer Of Court, Not Mere Agent Of Client: Allahabad High Court Distinguishes Between Active Concealment & Statement In Ignorance, Slaps Cost On Litigants For Misleading Bench Cannot Summon Accused Mechanically On Protest Petition Without Assigning Justifiable Reasons: Andhra Pradesh High Court Increment Not A Bounty: Allahabad High Court Rules Public Holiday Cannot Delay Pay Hike For Teachers Joining Next Working Day Paying Taxes Or Utility Connections Confer No Legal Ownership Over Govt Land': Andhra Pradesh High Court Orders Demolition Of Encroachment 'Cannot Compel Public Authority To Collect Data From Private Bodies': Bombay High Court Quashes CIC Orders Directing SEBI To Procure BSE Records Under RTI Act Section 10 CPC Cannot Stay Previously Instituted Title Suit Pending Subsequent Probate Case; Inherent Powers Under Section 151 Inapplicable When Probate Dismissed: Calcutta High Court Mere Phone Calls Without Transcripts No Ground For Murder Conspiracy: Delhi High Court Clear Violation Of Section 42 NDPS Act': Gujarat High Court Holds Failure To Record Secret Info In Writing Fatal When Police Officer Had Time To Act JK High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Cop Accused Of Threatening Advocate Over Phone Call Without Prior Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC Custody Unwarranted For Mere Formalities Once Weapon Is Recovered: Kerala High Court Grants Regular Bail In BNS Axe Attack Case Circumstances Of Crime Can Be Assessed During Trial: High Court Upholds Trial Of Minor As Adult Under JJ Act In Murder Case Statutory Deposit Under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC Is A Sine Qua Non; Litigant Cannot Stall Auction Sale By Merely Blaming Counsel: Madras High Court Ban Junk Food Within 50 Metres Of Schools: Rajasthan High Court Takes Suo Moto Cognizance To Enforce FSSAI Norms, Protect Children From Obesity

Supreme Court Rules Deceased as Bona Fide Passenger in Railway Accident, Awards Compensation

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment delivered on 16 May 2023, the Supreme Court of India ruled in the case of Kamukayi & Ors. V. Union of India and Ors., that the deceased in a railway accident was a bona fide passenger. The Court set aside the findings of the Claims Tribunal and the High Court, terming them as perverse.

The case revolved around a claim petition filed by the appellants seeking compensation for the death of the deceased in an untoward incident. The initial burden was on the claimants to prove that the deceased was a bona fide passenger, which they successfully established. The burden then shifted to the Railway Administration to disprove this, but they failed to provide any evidence to refute the deceased’s status as a bona fide passenger.

The Court also took Into account an investigation report accepted by the Divisional Railway Manager, which acknowledged the occurrence of the untoward incident. The findings of the Claims Tribunal and the High Court were criticized for not considering the investigation documents and final report, leading to their set-aside as perverse.

Regarding the compensation, the Court referred to the amended Compensation Rules and held that the amount payable should be calculated based on the amended rules. The Court applied the principles laid down in previous judgments, including Rina Devi and Radha Yadav, and emphasized that the claimants should receive the higher of two amounts if the liability for compensation arose before the amendment.

Consequently, the Court allowed the appeal and awarded the appellants compensation of Rs. 4,00,000/- with interest at 7% per annum. If the final figure, after applying interest, is less than Rs. 8,00,000/-, the appellants will be entitled to the higher amount. The respondents were directed to pay the compensation within eight weeks.

This judgment highlights the importance of establishing the status of a bona fide passenger in railway accident cases and the burden of proof placed on both claimants and the Railway Administration. It also showcases the Court’s commitment to ensuring just compensation for victims of untoward incidents.

16 May 2023,

Kamukayi & Ors. V. Union of India and Ors.

 

Latest Legal News