Second Appeal is Not a Forum for Rehearing or Reassessment of Evidence: Andhra Pradesh High Court Dismisses Partition Suit Appeal Failure of Justice Must Be Proved, Not Assumed: Calcutta High Court Upholds Murder Conviction Despite Charge Framing Lapse Bail is the Rule, Refusal is an Exception – Right to Liberty Cannot Be Ignored: Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Ivory Coast National in NDPS Case Courts Must Adopt a Justice-Oriented Approach in Matrimonial Cases: Gauhati High Court Condones Delay in Family Court Appeal FIR Quashing | Breath Analyzer Test Alone Cannot Prove Alcohol Consumption: Patna High Court Quashes FIR Under Bihar Prohibition Law Unregistered Writing Cannot Confer Ownership: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Dispute Allegations of Stalking and Criminal Intimidation Must Be Tested at Trial: Gujarat High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Nestlé Officials Over Maggi Noodles Controversy No Shortcuts in NDPS Investigations – J&K High Court Rebukes Casual Approach of Investigating Officers Sessions Court Cannot Order Re-Investigation: Allahabad High Court Quashes Direction Against Jaypee Hospital If Official Witnesses Are Reliable, Independent Corroboration Is Not a Must:  Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds NDPS Conviction No Service Tax Can Be Levied on Sale of Lottery Tickets: Supreme Court Rules That Lottery Distributors Are Not Agents Courts Cannot Be Silent Spectators When Justice Is Denied Due to Procedural Errors:  Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Recall of Bail Rejection Order Section 27 of the Evidence Act Requires Independent Corroboration—Mere Claims by Police Are Not Enough: Supreme Court on Flawed Investigation Confession to Police Is No Confession in Law: Supreme Court Acquits Man, Citing Inadmissibility of Statements Made in Custody Mere 'Last Seen Together' Is Not Enough for Conviction Unless It Forms a Complete Chain of Circumstantial Evidence: Supreme Court Sets Aside Life Sentence in 16-Year-Old Girl’s Murder Failure to Explain Wife’s Death Strengthens Guilt Under Section 106 of Evidence Act" – Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case Child Witness Testimony Cannot Be Discarded Solely on Grounds of Tutoring: Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case

Supreme Court Rules Deceased as Bona Fide Passenger in Railway Accident, Awards Compensation

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment delivered on 16 May 2023, the Supreme Court of India ruled in the case of Kamukayi & Ors. V. Union of India and Ors., that the deceased in a railway accident was a bona fide passenger. The Court set aside the findings of the Claims Tribunal and the High Court, terming them as perverse.

The case revolved around a claim petition filed by the appellants seeking compensation for the death of the deceased in an untoward incident. The initial burden was on the claimants to prove that the deceased was a bona fide passenger, which they successfully established. The burden then shifted to the Railway Administration to disprove this, but they failed to provide any evidence to refute the deceased’s status as a bona fide passenger.

The Court also took Into account an investigation report accepted by the Divisional Railway Manager, which acknowledged the occurrence of the untoward incident. The findings of the Claims Tribunal and the High Court were criticized for not considering the investigation documents and final report, leading to their set-aside as perverse.

Regarding the compensation, the Court referred to the amended Compensation Rules and held that the amount payable should be calculated based on the amended rules. The Court applied the principles laid down in previous judgments, including Rina Devi and Radha Yadav, and emphasized that the claimants should receive the higher of two amounts if the liability for compensation arose before the amendment.

Consequently, the Court allowed the appeal and awarded the appellants compensation of Rs. 4,00,000/- with interest at 7% per annum. If the final figure, after applying interest, is less than Rs. 8,00,000/-, the appellants will be entitled to the higher amount. The respondents were directed to pay the compensation within eight weeks.

This judgment highlights the importance of establishing the status of a bona fide passenger in railway accident cases and the burden of proof placed on both claimants and the Railway Administration. It also showcases the Court’s commitment to ensuring just compensation for victims of untoward incidents.

16 May 2023,

Kamukayi & Ors. V. Union of India and Ors.

 

Similar News