Patta Without SDM’s Prior Approval Is Void Ab Initio And Cannot Be Cancelled – It Never Legally Existed: Allahabad High Court Natural Guardian Means Legal Guardian: Custody Cannot Be Denied to Father Without Strong Reason: Orissa High Court Slams Family Court for Technical Rejection Affidavit Is Not a Caste Certificate: Madhya Pradesh High Court Sets Aside Zila Panchayat Member's Election for Failing Eligibility Under OBC Quota Confession Recorded By DCP Is Legally Valid Under KCOCA – Bengaluru DCP Holds Rank Equivalent To SP: Karnataka High Court Difference of Opinion Cannot End in Death: Jharkhand High Court Commutes Death Sentence in Maoist Ambush Killing SP Pakur and Five Policemen Mere Presence Of Beneficiary During Execution Does Not Cast Suspicion On Will: Delhi High Court Litigants Have No Right to Choose the Bench: Bombay High Court Rules Rule 3A Is Mandatory, Sends Writ to Kolhapur Testimony Must Be of Sterling Quality: Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Grandfather in Rape Case, Citing Unnatural Conduct and Infirm Evidence Cheating and Forgery Taint Even Legal Funds: No Safe Haven in Law for Laundered Money: Bombay High Court Final Maintenance Is Not Bound by Interim Orders – Section 125 Determination Must Be Based on Real Evidence: Delhi High Court Contempt | Power to Punish Carries Within It the Power to Forgive: Supreme Court Sets Aside Jail Term for Director Who Criticised Judges Over Stray Dog Orders Seizure and Attachment Are Not Twins: Supreme Court Holds Police Can Freeze Bank Accounts in PC Act Cases Using CrPC Section 102 IBC | Pre-Existing Dispute Must Be Real, Not Moonshine: Supreme Court Restores Insolvency Proceedings, Says Admission Cannot Be Rejected Based on Spurious Defence Summons Under FEMA Are Civil in Nature – Section 160 CrPC Has No Role to Play: Delhi High Court Denies Exemption to Woman Petitioner from Personal Appearance Before ED Clear Admission in Ledger Is Sufficient for Summary Judgment: Delhi High Court Decrees ₹16.77 Cr in Favour of MSME Supplier Mere Allegation Under SC/ST Act Doesn’t Bar Bail When No Public Abuse Is Made Out: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail in Caste Atrocity Case Consent Of Girl Aged Above 16 Is Legally Valid Under Pre-2013 Law: Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Rape Conviction Insurer Entitled to Recover Compensation from Owner When Driver Has No Licence or Fake Licence: Punjab & Haryana High Court Applies ‘Pay and Recover’ Doctrine Courts Cannot Rewrite Contracts Where Parties Have Failed to Clearly Define Property Terms: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit Even Illegal Appointments Cannot Be Cancelled Without Hearing: Patna High Court Quashes Mass Termination Of Absorbed University Staff Renewal Is Not Extension Unless Terms Are Fixed in Same Deed: Bombay High Court Strikes Down ₹64.75 Lakh Stamp Duty Demand on Nine-Year Lease Fraud Vitiates All Solemn Acts—Appointment Void Ab Initio Even After 27 Years: Allahabad High Court Litigants Cannot Be Penalised For Attending Criminal Proceedings Listed On Same Day: Delhi High Court Restores Civil Suit Dismissed For Default Limited Permissive Use Confers No Right to Expand Trademark Beyond Agreed Territories: Bombay High Court Enforces Consent Decree in ‘New Indian Express’ Trademark Dispute Assam Rifles Not Entitled to Parity with Indian Army Merely Due to Similar Duties: Delhi High Court Dismisses Equal Pay Petition Conspiracy Cannot Be Presumed from Illicit Relationship: Bombay High Court Acquits Wife, Affirms Conviction of Paramour in Murder Case Bail in NDPS Commercial Quantity Cases Cannot Be Granted Without Satisfying Twin Conditions of Section 37: Delhi High Court Cancels Bail Orders Terming Them ‘Perversely Illegal’

Supreme Court Rules Child Adopted by Widow After Government Servant's Death Not Entitled to Family Pension

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has held that a child adopted by a widow of a government servant after the government servant's death is not entitled to receive family pension. The apex court, in its judgment delivered today, stated, "The purpose of family pension is to provide support to the dependents of the deceased government servant, and the definition of 'family' cannot be expanded to include persons who were not dependents at the time of the government servant's death." The bench clarified that the term 'adoption' in the relevant pension rule should be limited to adoptions made during the government servant's lifetime and should not extend to cases of adoption posthumously. This ruling upholds the restricted interpretation of the term 'family' in relation to a government servant, ensuring the integrity of the pension scheme.

This decision by the Supreme Court carries significant implications for individuals seeking family pension as dependents of deceased government servants. The court emphasized the purpose of family pension as a means of providing financial support exclusively to those who were dependent on the government servant during their lifetime. By restricting the scope of adoption to cases where it occurred during the government servant's lifetime, the court has effectively curtailed the expansion of the definition of 'family' beyond its intended boundaries. The ruling protects the pension scheme from potential abuse and maintains its integrity.

The case before the Supreme Court centered on a child who was adopted by the widow of a deceased government servant and sought entitlement to family pension under the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972. The court carefully analyzed the provisions of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956, as well as the pension rules, and concluded that the adoption of a child by a widow after her husband's death did not fall within the definition of 'family' as contemplated under the pension rules.

This decision aligns with the court's commitment to interpreting laws and rules in a manner that safeguards their original purpose and intent. It emphasizes the distinction between the rights of an adopted child under personal laws and their entitlement to family pension under specific pension rules. The Supreme Court's ruling settles the question of eligibility for family pension in cases of posthumous adoption, providing clarity and consistency in the application of pension rules.

The judgment serves as a precedent, setting a clear legal precedent that will impact similar cases in the future. It reinforces the necessity of a direct association or connection with the deceased government servant at the time of their death for eligibility to family pension. This ruling, which preserves the sanctity of the pension scheme, will play a crucial role in determining entitlements and ensuring the financial well-being of the dependents of deceased government servants.

Date of Decision: June 13, 2023

SHRI RAM SHRIDHAR CHIMURKAR   vs UNION OF INDIA & ANR.                        

Latest Legal News