Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

Supreme Court Remands Land Acquisition Compensation Case to High Court for Fresh Adjudication on Cross Objections

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the Supreme Court of India has remanded a land acquisition compensation case to the High Court for fresh adjudication on the cross objections filed by the appellants. The bench comprising of Justice Krishna Murari and Justice Bela M. Trivedi passed the judgment on 4th July 2023.

The case pertained to the acquisition of lands by the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority in Uttar Pradesh. The appellants had challenged the compensation granted for the acquisition of their lands, claiming higher compensation on the grounds of parity to other lands in the vicinity.

The District Judge had initially determined the market value of the lands but deducted a portion for development charges. Both the appellants and the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority had filed appeals in the High Court against this decision. However, the High Court confirmed the compensation as determined by the District Judge.

The appellants contended that their cross objections, filed in the appeal, were not considered by the High Court while passing the judgment. The Supreme Court examined the provisions of Order 41 Rule 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which govern the remedies available to a respondent in the court of first appeal.

Justice Krishna Murari, delivering the judgment, emphasized that cross objections have the same status as a regular appeal and must be considered in full by the court. The High Court was found to have failed in its obligation to apply its mind to all the issues raised, including the cross objections. As a result, the Supreme Court held that the matter should be remanded back to the High Court for fresh adjudication on the grounds raised in the cross objections.

The judgment highlighted the importance of the court of first appeal in recording findings supported by reasons on all the issues raised. It cited relevant precedents to emphasize the duty of the court to consider cross objections and the consequences of failing to do so.

The decision of the Supreme Court grants a renewed opportunity to the appellants to present their case and have their cross objections duly considered by the High Court. The remand for fresh adjudication aims to ensure a fair and comprehensive consideration of all the grounds raised in the appeal.

The Supreme Court’s decision to remand the case to the High Court sets a precedent for the proper consideration of cross objections in land acquisition matters, contributing to the fair and just resolution of disputes in this domain.

Date of Decision: 4th July, 2023

DHEERAJ SINGH    vs GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS.   

Latest Legal News