Supreme Court Lays Down Comprehensive Guidelines To Prevent Misuse Of POCSO Act In Matrimonial Disputes Land Reforms Act | Joint Application For Pre-Emption By Adjoining Landowners Is Maintainable: Calcutta High Court Ocular Evidence In Conflict With Medical Findings Or Withholding Of Natural Witnesses Vitiates Prosecution Case: Allahabad High Court Compassionate Appointment Claim Must Be Decided Based On Policy Prevalent At Time Of Death: Bombay High Court Section 376 IPC | Failure To Prove Initial Dishonest Intent In Marriage Promise Renders Sexual Relationship Consensual: Allahabad High Court Prolonged Incarceration And Delay In Trial Are Valid Grounds To Invoke Constitutional Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 In UAPA Cases: Delhi High Court Motor Vehicles Act | Insurer Liable To Pay And Recover Compensation For Gratuitous Passengers In Goods Vehicles: Gujarat High Court Proof Of Demand And Acceptance Under PC Act Must Be Evaluated Based On Preponderance Of Probabilities In Rebuttal: Kerala High Court Tenancy Claim | Mere Possession Without Lawful Foundation Or Identification Of Tenanted Land Cannot Confer Occupancy Rights: Karnataka High Court 125 CrPC | Maintenance Cannot Be Evaded By Claiming Physical Disability If Conduct Indicates Concealment Of Financial Means: Kerala High Court M.P. Municipal Corporation Act | Locus Standi Under Section 307(5) Limited To Residents Of The Municipal Area: Madhya Pradesh High Court Writ Jurisdiction | Belated Challenge To Disciplinary Action After Superannuation Amounts To Laches; Petition Dismissed: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC | Mere Pendency Of Partition Suit Does Not Entitle Plaintiff To Injunction Restraining Reconstruction Of Residential Building: Kerala High Court Not A Mere Breach Of Contract: Telangana High Court Refuses To Quash FIR In ₹73 Crore Garment Investment Fraud Section 482 CrPC | High Court Quashes FIR Following Private Compromise In Non-Heinous Dispute Arising From Civil Conflict Mere Involvement In Criminal Case Does Not Constitute Moral Turpitude To Deny Public Appointment: Telangana High Court Pendency Of Investigation Cannot Be A Blanket Ground To Deny Permission For Foreign Travel: Rajasthan High Court Fraudulent Representation By Counsel Vitiates Ex Parte Decree: Punjab & Haryana High Court Holds Professional Misconduct As Evidence Of Fraud Writ Jurisdiction | Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Pending Criminal And Departmental Proceedings Renders Petition Liable To Dismissal: Orissa High Court Banking Fraud | Failure Of Bank Official To Conduct Physical Inspection Of Collateral Property Constitutes Criminal Conspiracy And Abuse Of Official Position: Madras High Court Fraud Vitiates Judicial Proceedings: Judgment Obtained Through Misrepresentation And Conflict Of Interest Cannot Be Sustained, Holds Punjab And Haryana High Court Discovery Under Section 27 Evidence Act From Publicly Accessible Place Requires Caution: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Articles At Instance Of Accused Without Independent Corroboration Cannot Sustain Conviction: Supreme Court DNA Profile Must Be Supported By Other Conclusive Evidence To Prove Guilt: Supreme Court

Supreme Court Rejects SCBA's Plea to Convert Entire 1.33-Acre Land into Lawyers' Chamber Block

03 September 2024 9:39 AM

By: Admin


New Delhi, March 23, 2023 - In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India has dismissed a petition filed by the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) seeking the conversion of an entire 1.33-acre tract of land near ITO into a chamber block for lawyers. The land was initially allotted by the Union Government for the construction of an archival block for the Supreme Court.

The SCBA also requested the conversion of the entire area around the Supreme Court into a Supreme Court Complex to utilize all buildings across the Supreme Court on Bhagwan Das Road for conversion into lawyers' chambers. Additionally, the petitioner sought the allotment of a government bungalow currently occupied by the Foreign Correspondents’ Club.

The Court observed that the issues raised in the petition cannot be resolved by judicial standards and should be addressed on the administrative side of the Supreme Court. The Court emphasized the importance of considering the needs and interests of all stakeholders, including lawyers, litigants, and the Supreme Court staff, when allocating available resources.

While the Court did not grant the reliefs sought in the petition, it left the matter open for the Supreme Court's administrative side to make appropriate decisions, taking into account the needs of the institution and its stakeholders. The Court also allowed the SCBA, Supreme Court Advocates on Record Association (SCAORA), and the Bar Council of India (BCI) to address the issue with their representations on the administrative side.

Supreme Court Bar Association  Vs Ministry of Urban Development & Ors.

Latest Legal News