Cruelty Need Not Be Physical: Mental Agony and Emotional Distress Are Sufficient Grounds for Divorce: Supreme Court Section 195 Cr.P.C. | Tribunals Are Not Courts: Private Complaints for Offences Like False Evidence Valid: Supreme Court Limitation | Right to Appeal Is Fundamental, Especially When Liberty Is at Stake: Supreme Court Condones 1637-Day Delay FIR Quashed | No Mens Rea, No Crime: Supreme Court Emphasizes Protection of Public Servants Acting in Good Faith Trademark | Passing Off Rights Trump Registration Rights: Delhi High Court A Minor Procedural Delay Should Not Disqualify Advances as Export Credit When Exports Are Fulfilled on Time: Bombay HC Preventive Detention Must Be Based on Relevant and Proximate Material: J&K High Court Terrorism Stems From Hateful Thoughts, Not Physical Abilities: Madhya Pradesh High Court Denies Bail of Alleged ISIS Conspiracy Forwarding Offensive Content Equals Liability: Madras High Court Upholds Conviction for Derogatory Social Media Post Against Women Journalists Investigation by Trap Leader Prejudiced the Case: Rajasthan High Court Quashes Conviction in PC Case VAT | Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Cannot Reopen Assessment: Kerala High Court Fishing Inquiry Not Permissible Under Section 91, Cr.P.C.: High Court Quashes Trial Court’s Order Directing CBI to Produce Unrelied Statements and Case Diary Vague and Omnibus Allegations Cannot Sustain Criminal Prosecution in Matrimonial Disputes: Calcutta High Court High Court Emphasizes Assessee’s Burden of Proof in Unexplained Cash Deposits Case Effective, efficient, and expeditious alternative remedies have been provided by the statute: High Court Dismisses Petition for New Commercial Electricity Connection Permissive Use Cannot Ripen into Right of Prescriptive Easement: Kerala High Court High Court Slams Procedural Delays, Orders FSL Report in Assault Case to Prevent Miscarriage of Justice Petitioner Did Not Endorse Part-Payments on Cheque; Section 138 NI Act Not Attracted: Madras High Court Minority Christian Schools Not Bound by Rules of 2018; Disciplinary Proceedings Can Continue: High Court of Calcutta Absence of Receipts No Barrier to Justice: Madras High Court Orders Theft Complaint Referral Under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C Rajasthan High Court Emphasizes Rehabilitation, Grants Probation to 67-Year-Old Convicted of Kidnapping" P&H High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Advocate Renuka Chopra: “A Frustrated Outburst Amid Systemic Challenges” Kerala High Court Criticizes Irregularities in Sabarimala Melsanthi Selection, Orders Compliance with Guidelines Non-Payment of Rent Does Not Constitute Criminal Breach of Trust: Calcutta High Court Administrative Orders Cannot Override Terminated Contracts: Rajasthan High Court Affirms in Landmark Decision Minimum Wage Claims Must Be Resolved by Designated Authorities Under the Minimum Wages Act, Not the Labour Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court Madras High Court Confirms Equal Coparcenary Rights for Daughters, Emphasizes Ancestral Property Rights Home Station Preferences Upheld in Transfer Case: Kerala High Court Overrules Tribunal on Teachers' Transfer Policy Failure to Formally Request Cross-Examination Does Not Invalidate Assessment Order: Calcutta High Court

Supreme Court Reinstates Four Dismissed Ex-Army Personnel, No Material That The Appellants Had Produced Any Relationship Certificate To Obtain Enrolment

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant verdict, the Supreme Court today reinstated four ex-army personnel who had been dismissed on the grounds of fraudulent enrollment. The bench, comprising Justices Bela M. Trivedi and Pankaj Mithal, found the dismissal orders to be lacking substantial evidence, especially regarding the alleged production of fake relationship certificates.

Legal Point of the Judgment: The Court focused on the principle of fairness in administrative actions, particularly in the context of dismissals based on allegations of fraud. The judgment underscores the necessity of a thorough inquiry and substantial evidence before concluding any fraudulent activity in recruitment processes.

Facts and Issues: The appellants were recruited under the Unit Headquarters Quota and later dismissed for allegedly using fake relationship certificates. The core issue revolved around whether the appellants had indeed applied as general category candidates and whether they had furnished any such fraudulent certificates.

Court’s Assessment: Justice Pankaj Mithal observed, “There is no material on record to establish that the appellants had produced any relationship certificate to obtain enrollment.” The Court criticized the lack of an inquiry or a finding establishing the actual production of such certificates by the appellants. The judgment highlighted, “An order passed without consideration of the material evidence or the plea would be violative of Principles of Natural Justice.”

Legal Principles and Law: The judgment referred to precedents like S.N. Mukherjee vs. Union of India and Mohinder Singh Gill vs. Chief Election Commissioner, emphasizing the importance of considering all relevant materials and evidences in administrative decisions.

Decision: The Supreme Court set aside the dismissal orders dated May 9, 2013, and the judgments of the Armed Forces Tribunal, ordering the reinstatement of the appellants with all consequential benefits.

Date of Decision: February 9, 2024.

Ex-Recruit Babanna Machched & Ors. Vs. Union of India and Ors.

 

Similar News