CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness Employee Cannot Switch Cadre At His Sweet Will After Accepting Promotion: J&K High Court Rejects Claim For Retrospective Assistant Registrar Appointment Anticipatory Bail Cannot Expire With Charge-Sheet: Supreme Court Reiterates Liberty Is Not Bound by Procedural Milestones Order II Rule 2 Cannot Eclipse Amendment Power Under Order VI Rule 17: MP High Court Refuses to Stall Will-Based Title Suit Grounds of Arrest Must Be Personal, Not Formal – But Detailed Allegations Suffice: Kerala High Court Upholds Arrest in Sabarimala Gold Misappropriation Case Grounds of Arrest Are Not a Ritual – They Are a Constitutional Mandate Under Article 22(1): Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Arrest for Non-Supply of Written Grounds Sect. 25 NDPS | Mere Ownership Cannot Fasten NDPS Liability – ‘Knowingly Permits’ Must Be Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt: MP High Court Section 308 CrPC | Revocation of Pardon Is Not Automatic on Prosecutor’s Certificate: Karnataka High Court Joint Family and Ancestral Property Are Alien to Mohammedan Law: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Injunction Right to Health Cannot Wait for Endless Consultations: Supreme Court Pulls Up FSSAI Over Delay in Front-of-Pack Warning Labels If A Son Dies Intestate Leaving Wife And Children, The Mother Has No Share: Karnataka High Court

Supreme Court Reinstates Four Dismissed Ex-Army Personnel, No Material That The Appellants Had Produced Any Relationship Certificate To Obtain Enrolment

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant verdict, the Supreme Court today reinstated four ex-army personnel who had been dismissed on the grounds of fraudulent enrollment. The bench, comprising Justices Bela M. Trivedi and Pankaj Mithal, found the dismissal orders to be lacking substantial evidence, especially regarding the alleged production of fake relationship certificates.

Legal Point of the Judgment: The Court focused on the principle of fairness in administrative actions, particularly in the context of dismissals based on allegations of fraud. The judgment underscores the necessity of a thorough inquiry and substantial evidence before concluding any fraudulent activity in recruitment processes.

Facts and Issues: The appellants were recruited under the Unit Headquarters Quota and later dismissed for allegedly using fake relationship certificates. The core issue revolved around whether the appellants had indeed applied as general category candidates and whether they had furnished any such fraudulent certificates.

Court’s Assessment: Justice Pankaj Mithal observed, “There is no material on record to establish that the appellants had produced any relationship certificate to obtain enrollment.” The Court criticized the lack of an inquiry or a finding establishing the actual production of such certificates by the appellants. The judgment highlighted, “An order passed without consideration of the material evidence or the plea would be violative of Principles of Natural Justice.”

Legal Principles and Law: The judgment referred to precedents like S.N. Mukherjee vs. Union of India and Mohinder Singh Gill vs. Chief Election Commissioner, emphasizing the importance of considering all relevant materials and evidences in administrative decisions.

Decision: The Supreme Court set aside the dismissal orders dated May 9, 2013, and the judgments of the Armed Forces Tribunal, ordering the reinstatement of the appellants with all consequential benefits.

Date of Decision: February 9, 2024.

Ex-Recruit Babanna Machched & Ors. Vs. Union of India and Ors.

 

Latest Legal News