Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

Supreme Court Reinstates Four Dismissed Ex-Army Personnel, No Material That The Appellants Had Produced Any Relationship Certificate To Obtain Enrolment

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant verdict, the Supreme Court today reinstated four ex-army personnel who had been dismissed on the grounds of fraudulent enrollment. The bench, comprising Justices Bela M. Trivedi and Pankaj Mithal, found the dismissal orders to be lacking substantial evidence, especially regarding the alleged production of fake relationship certificates.

Legal Point of the Judgment: The Court focused on the principle of fairness in administrative actions, particularly in the context of dismissals based on allegations of fraud. The judgment underscores the necessity of a thorough inquiry and substantial evidence before concluding any fraudulent activity in recruitment processes.

Facts and Issues: The appellants were recruited under the Unit Headquarters Quota and later dismissed for allegedly using fake relationship certificates. The core issue revolved around whether the appellants had indeed applied as general category candidates and whether they had furnished any such fraudulent certificates.

Court’s Assessment: Justice Pankaj Mithal observed, “There is no material on record to establish that the appellants had produced any relationship certificate to obtain enrollment.” The Court criticized the lack of an inquiry or a finding establishing the actual production of such certificates by the appellants. The judgment highlighted, “An order passed without consideration of the material evidence or the plea would be violative of Principles of Natural Justice.”

Legal Principles and Law: The judgment referred to precedents like S.N. Mukherjee vs. Union of India and Mohinder Singh Gill vs. Chief Election Commissioner, emphasizing the importance of considering all relevant materials and evidences in administrative decisions.

Decision: The Supreme Court set aside the dismissal orders dated May 9, 2013, and the judgments of the Armed Forces Tribunal, ordering the reinstatement of the appellants with all consequential benefits.

Date of Decision: February 9, 2024.

Ex-Recruit Babanna Machched & Ors. Vs. Union of India and Ors.

 

Latest Legal News