Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Supreme Court Quashes Proceedings in Trivial Altercation Case, Cites "Persecution and Harassment" Concerns

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India delivered a judgment quashing the criminal proceedings in a case stemming from a minor altercation between two individuals. The case, Criminal Appeal No. 2255 of 2023, arose from a Special Leave Petition (Crl) No. 4405 of 2018.

The bench, presided over by Justice Bela M. Trivedi, rendered the verdict on 3rd August 2023, in the Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction. The case involved the appellant, Sunil Kumar, who was an Assistant Engineer at the Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Ltd., and the respondent no. 2, who held the position of a Peon in the same office.

The chargesheet was filed against Sunil Kumar under Sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 504 (intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of peace), and 506 (criminal intimidation) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) following cross-complaints between the parties regarding an incident on 11th September 2014.

Justice Bela M. Trivedi, while delivering the judgment, remarked, "Considering the nature of allegations against the appellant which are of very trivial nature and considering the fact that there is no progress made in the proceedings since the chargesheet was filed against the appellant in the year 2015, the Court is of the opinion that continuing the proceedings would be a persecution and harassment to the appellant."

The Court emphasized that such a petty incident that took place in their workplace should have been resolved amicably between the parties on the same day instead of being stretched out over several years through legal proceedings.

Supreme Court quashed and set aside the proceedings in the case no. 3354 of 2014 pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate in Fatehpur (U.P.). The decision was hailed by legal experts as a significant step towards preventing undue harassment and congestion in the judiciary caused by trivial disputes.

This ruling serves as a precedent for similar cases where the Court's discretion may be exercised to avoid unnecessary prosecution and uphold justice in a fair and efficient manner.

Date of Decision: 03.08.2023

SUNIL KUMAR  vs STATE OF U.P. & ANR.        

Latest Legal News