Courts Cannot Rewrite Contracts or Dictate Economic Policy: Supreme Court Strikes Down Madras HC’s Intervention in Formula 4 Racing Event Advocates Must Uphold Integrity; Mere Name Lending Without Active Participation Amounts to Misconduct: Supreme Court Contempt Jurisdiction Should Protect Justice, Not Judges' Personal Dignity: PH High Court Reaffirms Limits of Criminal Contempt Amendments to KPBR 2019 Ensure Compliance in Church Construction: Kerala High Court Dismisses Challenges Mere Allegation of Fraud Without Specific Pleadings and Evidence Cannot Reopen a Concluded Judgment: Delhi High Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Petitions Alleging Police Harassment and Seeking Protection for Whistle-blowers Violations of Conditions Will Not Be Tolerated: Kerla High Court Cancels Bail, Citing Threats to Victim Public Infrastructure Cannot Be Altered for Private Convenience Without Compelling Reasons: Punjab and Haryana High Court Refused To Relocation of Foot Over Bridge Accident Claim | Compensation Must Be Just, Not a Mere Mathematical Exercise –  Must Reflect Real Hardships: Supreme Court Accident Claim | Compensation Must Reflect the True Impact of Disability on One’s Life and Livelihood: Supreme Court Accident Claim | Compensation for Foreign Earnings Must Reflect Exchange Rate on Date of Claim Petition: Supreme Court A Conviction Under Section 366A IPC Cannot Stand Without Conclusive Proof That the Victim Was a Minor:  Supreme Court Integrity of a Public Servant Must Be Beyond Suspicion: Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Former Indian Airlines Official for Forgery and Corruption Minor in Live-In Relationship Deemed 'Child in Need of Care' by High Court, Protection Ordered Under Juvenile Justice Act Cheque Signed, Sealed, and Bounced – No Escape from Liability: Delhi High Court Right to Defend Includes Right to Inspect Documents: Calcutta High Court Overrules Trial Court's Rejection of Inspection Petition Court Cannot Tinker with Finalized Consolidation Scheme Under Section 42: Punjab and Haryana High Court Remarriage During Appeal Period is Risky, But Not Void: Andhra Pradesh High Court

Supreme Court Quashes Proceedings in Trivial Altercation Case, Cites "Persecution and Harassment" Concerns

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India delivered a judgment quashing the criminal proceedings in a case stemming from a minor altercation between two individuals. The case, Criminal Appeal No. 2255 of 2023, arose from a Special Leave Petition (Crl) No. 4405 of 2018.

The bench, presided over by Justice Bela M. Trivedi, rendered the verdict on 3rd August 2023, in the Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction. The case involved the appellant, Sunil Kumar, who was an Assistant Engineer at the Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Ltd., and the respondent no. 2, who held the position of a Peon in the same office.

The chargesheet was filed against Sunil Kumar under Sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 504 (intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of peace), and 506 (criminal intimidation) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) following cross-complaints between the parties regarding an incident on 11th September 2014.

Justice Bela M. Trivedi, while delivering the judgment, remarked, "Considering the nature of allegations against the appellant which are of very trivial nature and considering the fact that there is no progress made in the proceedings since the chargesheet was filed against the appellant in the year 2015, the Court is of the opinion that continuing the proceedings would be a persecution and harassment to the appellant."

The Court emphasized that such a petty incident that took place in their workplace should have been resolved amicably between the parties on the same day instead of being stretched out over several years through legal proceedings.

Supreme Court quashed and set aside the proceedings in the case no. 3354 of 2014 pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate in Fatehpur (U.P.). The decision was hailed by legal experts as a significant step towards preventing undue harassment and congestion in the judiciary caused by trivial disputes.

This ruling serves as a precedent for similar cases where the Court's discretion may be exercised to avoid unnecessary prosecution and uphold justice in a fair and efficient manner.

Date of Decision: 03.08.2023

SUNIL KUMAR  vs STATE OF U.P. & ANR.        

Similar News