Not A Mere Breach Of Contract: Telangana High Court Refuses To Quash FIR In ₹73 Crore Garment Investment Fraud Accused Not Entitled To Copies Of 'Unrelied' Upon Documents At The Stage Of Framing Of Charges Under Section 91 CrPC: Supreme Court Elected Representatives Have No Privilege To Resort To Violence; Criminal Antecedents Are Material For Bail Adjudication: Supreme Court Mere Absence Of Transport Documents Does Not Create A Presumption Of Violation Of Chhattisgarh Agricultural Cattle Preservation Act, 2004: Supreme Court Section 396 IPC | Conviction For 'Dacoity With Murder' Requires Proof That Murder Was Committed In The Course Of Dacoity: Allahabad High Court 'Developers Cannot Delay Conveyance For Eternity And Milk Additional FSI Benefits': Bombay High Court Upholds Societies' Deemed Conveyance Pre-Approval Statutory Dues Stand Extinguished Upon Approval Of Resolution Plan; GST Authorities Cannot Initiate Fresh Proceedings: Calcutta High Court Unregistered Agreement To Sell With Delivery Of Possession Is Admissible In A Suit For Specific Performance: Delhi High Court Stigmatic Order Discharging Probationer Without Inquiry Is Void For Violation Of Natural Justice: Gujarat High Court Execution Proceedings | Court Cannot Impose Arbitrary Financial Conditions Without Reason In Stay Applications: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 528 BNSS | High Court Cannot Exercise Inherent Powers To Circumvent Statutory Bar Against Second Revision: Delhi High Court Advocate Empanelment | Restriction On Multiple Applications Is A Procedural Choice Within Employer’s Domain: Delhi High Court Acquittal Appeal | Double Presumption Of Innocence In Favour Of Accused Cannot Be Disturbed Merely Because Another View Is Possible: Gujarat High Court SC/ST Act | Offence Under Section 3(1)(g) Not Attracted If Dispossession Or Interference Is Not Due To Victim's Caste: Himachal Pradesh High Court Judicial Officer Must Maintain Distance From Practicing Advocates To Avoid Impropriety: Gujarat High Court Upholds Dismissal Section 183 BNSS | Investigating Officer Cannot Independently Record Further Statement Of Victim After Recording Before Magistrate: Karnataka High Court Non-Production Of Case Property And Missing Link Evidence In Seizure Cases Vitiates Prosecution: Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees Compensation Act | Death Due To Cardiac Arrest During Employment Is An 'Accident' Arising Out Of Stress And Strain Of Duty: J&K High Court Transfer Of Proceedings | Courts Must Issue Fresh Notice To Parties Even If They Had Appeared Before The Transferor Court: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Award Section 80P(4) IT Act Does Not Deny Deduction To Regional Rural Banks As They Retain The 'Deemed Co-operative Society' Status Under Section 22 RRB Act: Madras High Court Property Purchased In Name Of Child For Family Benefit Is Not A 'Benami Transaction' Under Section 2(9) Of The 1988 Act: Madhya Pradesh High Court Person Without Caveatable Interest Cannot Challenge Will Or Seek Revocation Of Probate: Madras High Court Divorce | Cruelty Must Be Assessed By Cumulative Effect Of Matrimonial Conduct Rather Than Isolated Incidents: Orissa High Court Merely Labeling Insurance Policy As Comprehensive Does Not Create Unlimited Liability: MP High Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Must Be Rejected If Limitation Bar Is Apparent From Face Of Pleadings: Patna High Court Limitation Act | 'Sufficient Cause' Cannot Be Used To Revive Stale Or Dead Claims By State: Orissa High Court Quashes Order Condoning 53-Year Delay Employee Cannot Remain Dormant Like Rip Van Winkle & Awaken At Convenience: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Stale Service Plea With ₹25K Cost Section 29 NDPS Act | Mere Allegation Of 'Cooperation' Without Specific Overt Acts Cannot Sustain Charge Of Conspiracy: Rajasthan High Court Forest Land Status Does Not Extinguish Private Civil Title: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Decree For Possession Once Admitted In Evidence, Document Cannot Be De-Marked On Grounds Of Insufficiency Of Stamp Duty: Telangana High Court Section 190 BNSS | Mere Presence In Unlawful Assembly With Active Intent Renders Member Vicariously Liable For Homicidal Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Contributory Negligence Under Motor Vehicles Act Cannot Be Inferred Without Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Enhances Compensation Motor Vehicles Act | Section 164 Compensation Of Rs. 5 Lakhs Applicable Even To Pending Claims Arising Prior To 2019 Amendment: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consumer Protection Act | Builder Liable To Pay Interest For Delayed Possession Despite Force Majeure Plea If Agreement Executed Post-Outbreak: State Commission

Supreme Court Quashes Order for Further Investigation by CBCID in Murder Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court of India, in a recent judgment, has quashed an order directing further investigation by the Crime Branch-Criminal Investigation Department (CBCID) in a murder case. The Court held that the order transferring the investigation to CBCID, passed by the Secretary (Home), was illegal and contrary to the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.PC).

The case, titled Bohatie Devi (Dead) Through LR vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors, originated from an appeal filed by the appellant, Bohatie Devi, who was the mother of the deceased, Satyveer alias Kallu. The High Court of Allahabad had earlier dismissed a writ petition filed by the appellant challenging the order of further investigation.

The appellant's son, Satyveer alias Kallu, was murdered by unknown persons, and an FIR was lodged against Smt. Anju and two unidentified individuals. The investigation was initially conducted by the Inspector of Police, Baraut, District Baghpat, who filed a chargesheet against two individuals. Subsequently, on the appellant's complaint, the investigation was handed over to the District Crime Branch, which filed a supplementary chargesheet against Ashwani Kumar and Smt. Anju. Cognizance of the chargesheet was taken by the Magistrate.

However, the appellant moved an application to the Secretary (Home), State of Uttar Pradesh, requesting the transfer of the investigation to CBCID. The Secretary (Home) ordered further investigation by CBCID, based on the application submitted by the mother of one of the accused. This order of transfer was challenged by the appellant through the writ petition.

The Supreme Court, in its judgment, observed that the order for further investigation by CBCID was not authorized by law. The Court noted that it was a case of reinvestigation rather than further investigation, which required the prior permission of the Magistrate. The Court emphasized that the Secretary (Home) did not have the authority to order further investigation by another agency, circumventing the provisions of the Cr.PC.

The Court further clarified that Section 173(3) of the Cr.PC, which deals with the submission of reports to the Magistrate, did not permit the Secretary (Home) to order further investigation by another agency. The Court held that such orders could potentially nullify earlier chargesheets and be misused by accused individuals.

Accordingly, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal and quashed the order of the Secretary (Home) transferring the investigation to CBCID. The Court also set aside the further investigation/reinvestigation by CBCID. However, it emphasized that all defenses available to the accused should be considered by the Trial Court during the trial proceedings.

DATE OF JUDGMENT: April 28, 2023

Bohatie Devi (Dead) Through LR vs The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors

 

Latest Legal News