Second Appeal is Not a Forum for Rehearing or Reassessment of Evidence: Andhra Pradesh High Court Dismisses Partition Suit Appeal Failure of Justice Must Be Proved, Not Assumed: Calcutta High Court Upholds Murder Conviction Despite Charge Framing Lapse Bail is the Rule, Refusal is an Exception – Right to Liberty Cannot Be Ignored: Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Ivory Coast National in NDPS Case Courts Must Adopt a Justice-Oriented Approach in Matrimonial Cases: Gauhati High Court Condones Delay in Family Court Appeal FIR Quashing | Breath Analyzer Test Alone Cannot Prove Alcohol Consumption: Patna High Court Quashes FIR Under Bihar Prohibition Law Unregistered Writing Cannot Confer Ownership: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Dispute Allegations of Stalking and Criminal Intimidation Must Be Tested at Trial: Gujarat High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Nestlé Officials Over Maggi Noodles Controversy No Shortcuts in NDPS Investigations – J&K High Court Rebukes Casual Approach of Investigating Officers Sessions Court Cannot Order Re-Investigation: Allahabad High Court Quashes Direction Against Jaypee Hospital If Official Witnesses Are Reliable, Independent Corroboration Is Not a Must:  Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds NDPS Conviction No Service Tax Can Be Levied on Sale of Lottery Tickets: Supreme Court Rules That Lottery Distributors Are Not Agents Courts Cannot Be Silent Spectators When Justice Is Denied Due to Procedural Errors:  Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Recall of Bail Rejection Order Section 27 of the Evidence Act Requires Independent Corroboration—Mere Claims by Police Are Not Enough: Supreme Court on Flawed Investigation Confession to Police Is No Confession in Law: Supreme Court Acquits Man, Citing Inadmissibility of Statements Made in Custody Mere 'Last Seen Together' Is Not Enough for Conviction Unless It Forms a Complete Chain of Circumstantial Evidence: Supreme Court Sets Aside Life Sentence in 16-Year-Old Girl’s Murder Failure to Explain Wife’s Death Strengthens Guilt Under Section 106 of Evidence Act" – Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case Child Witness Testimony Cannot Be Discarded Solely on Grounds of Tutoring: Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case

Supreme Court Quashes Order for Further Investigation by CBCID in Murder Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court of India, in a recent judgment, has quashed an order directing further investigation by the Crime Branch-Criminal Investigation Department (CBCID) in a murder case. The Court held that the order transferring the investigation to CBCID, passed by the Secretary (Home), was illegal and contrary to the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.PC).

The case, titled Bohatie Devi (Dead) Through LR vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors, originated from an appeal filed by the appellant, Bohatie Devi, who was the mother of the deceased, Satyveer alias Kallu. The High Court of Allahabad had earlier dismissed a writ petition filed by the appellant challenging the order of further investigation.

The appellant's son, Satyveer alias Kallu, was murdered by unknown persons, and an FIR was lodged against Smt. Anju and two unidentified individuals. The investigation was initially conducted by the Inspector of Police, Baraut, District Baghpat, who filed a chargesheet against two individuals. Subsequently, on the appellant's complaint, the investigation was handed over to the District Crime Branch, which filed a supplementary chargesheet against Ashwani Kumar and Smt. Anju. Cognizance of the chargesheet was taken by the Magistrate.

However, the appellant moved an application to the Secretary (Home), State of Uttar Pradesh, requesting the transfer of the investigation to CBCID. The Secretary (Home) ordered further investigation by CBCID, based on the application submitted by the mother of one of the accused. This order of transfer was challenged by the appellant through the writ petition.

The Supreme Court, in its judgment, observed that the order for further investigation by CBCID was not authorized by law. The Court noted that it was a case of reinvestigation rather than further investigation, which required the prior permission of the Magistrate. The Court emphasized that the Secretary (Home) did not have the authority to order further investigation by another agency, circumventing the provisions of the Cr.PC.

The Court further clarified that Section 173(3) of the Cr.PC, which deals with the submission of reports to the Magistrate, did not permit the Secretary (Home) to order further investigation by another agency. The Court held that such orders could potentially nullify earlier chargesheets and be misused by accused individuals.

Accordingly, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal and quashed the order of the Secretary (Home) transferring the investigation to CBCID. The Court also set aside the further investigation/reinvestigation by CBCID. However, it emphasized that all defenses available to the accused should be considered by the Trial Court during the trial proceedings.

DATE OF JUDGMENT: April 28, 2023

Bohatie Devi (Dead) Through LR vs The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors

 

Similar News