Courts Cannot Rewrite Contracts or Dictate Economic Policy: Supreme Court Strikes Down Madras HC’s Intervention in Formula 4 Racing Event Advocates Must Uphold Integrity; Mere Name Lending Without Active Participation Amounts to Misconduct: Supreme Court Contempt Jurisdiction Should Protect Justice, Not Judges' Personal Dignity: PH High Court Reaffirms Limits of Criminal Contempt Amendments to KPBR 2019 Ensure Compliance in Church Construction: Kerala High Court Dismisses Challenges Mere Allegation of Fraud Without Specific Pleadings and Evidence Cannot Reopen a Concluded Judgment: Delhi High Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Petitions Alleging Police Harassment and Seeking Protection for Whistle-blowers Violations of Conditions Will Not Be Tolerated: Kerla High Court Cancels Bail, Citing Threats to Victim Public Infrastructure Cannot Be Altered for Private Convenience Without Compelling Reasons: Punjab and Haryana High Court Refused To Relocation of Foot Over Bridge Accident Claim | Compensation Must Be Just, Not a Mere Mathematical Exercise –  Must Reflect Real Hardships: Supreme Court Accident Claim | Compensation Must Reflect the True Impact of Disability on One’s Life and Livelihood: Supreme Court Accident Claim | Compensation for Foreign Earnings Must Reflect Exchange Rate on Date of Claim Petition: Supreme Court A Conviction Under Section 366A IPC Cannot Stand Without Conclusive Proof That the Victim Was a Minor:  Supreme Court Integrity of a Public Servant Must Be Beyond Suspicion: Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Former Indian Airlines Official for Forgery and Corruption Minor in Live-In Relationship Deemed 'Child in Need of Care' by High Court, Protection Ordered Under Juvenile Justice Act Cheque Signed, Sealed, and Bounced – No Escape from Liability: Delhi High Court Right to Defend Includes Right to Inspect Documents: Calcutta High Court Overrules Trial Court's Rejection of Inspection Petition Court Cannot Tinker with Finalized Consolidation Scheme Under Section 42: Punjab and Haryana High Court Remarriage During Appeal Period is Risky, But Not Void: Andhra Pradesh High Court

Supreme Court Quashes FIR in Landmark Judgment, Cites "Fabricated and Improbable" Allegations

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has quashed an FIR in a case involving allegations of fraud, illegal mining, and exploitation, after deeming the accusations "fabricated and improbable." The bench, comprising Justice B.R. Gavai and Justice J.B. Pardiwala, delivered the judgment on August 8, 2023.

The case, arising from FIR No. 127 of 2022 registered at Mirzapur Police Station, Saharanpur, Uttar Pradesh, raised issues of abuse of process and personal vengeance. The appellants, Mahmood Ali & Ors., had approached the High Court seeking the quashing of the FIR, which the High Court had declined.

In its ruling, the Supreme Court invoked the principles established in the famous case of State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal (1992) to assess whether the FIR could be quashed. The court emphasized that while considering quashing, it was not limited to the contents of the FIR alone but also took into account the surrounding circumstances and materials collected during the investigation.

The court noted that the allegations presented in the FIR were not only "absurd but also highly improbable." The FIR had been lodged after a considerable delay of 14 years from the alleged incidents. The bench pointed out that "none of the ingredients to constitute the offense as alleged are disclosed." Additionally, the court recognized the possibility of the FIR being a result of personal vendetta, given the timing of its registration.

Referring to the changing political scenario in the state of Uttar Pradesh and the appellants' criminal history, the court opined that there was a motive for an increase in criminal complaints. It observed that the FIR appeared to be a part of a pattern of multiple cases being registered against the appellants.

Supreme Court concluded that the FIR failed to disclose the essential elements necessary to constitute the alleged offenses. It found the allegations to be concocted and quashed the criminal proceedings arising from the FIR, stating that the case fell under parameters laid down in the Bhajan Lal case.

Date of Decision: August 8, 2023 

MAHMOOD ALI & ORS. vs STATE OF U.P. & ORS.

Similar News