Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

Supreme Court Quashes FIR  in Gang Rape Case Against Appellant for Lack of Specific Allegations

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent verdict On 08 August 2023, the Supreme Court of India quashed the FIR registered against the appellant in a land dispute case due to the absence of specific allegations against the accused. The bench, comprising of Justice J.B. Pardiwala, pronounced the judgment on August 08, 2023.

The case, titled *Haji Iqbal @ Bala v. State of U.P. & Ors.*, involved allegations of rape, criminal intimidation, and a land dispute. The appellant was accused No. 2 in the FIR and had appealed to quash the FIR after it was rejected by the High Court. The central question before the Supreme Court was whether the allegations in the FIR were sufficient to proceed with the trial against the appellant.

Justice Pardiwala, while delivering the judgment, emphasized that the FIR contained no specific allegations against the appellant and that his name appeared in the FIR without any particular role or active participation attributed to him. The Court observed that mere naming of the appellant in the FIR was not enough to sustain criminal proceedings.

The Court further noted the delay of almost four years in lodging the FIR after the alleged incident took place. This delay, according to the Court, raised concerns about the credibility of the allegations and the possibility of personal grudge or vengeance. The bench stressed that while allegations of rape are serious and should not be taken lightly, false allegations can also cause distress and humiliation to the accused.

The judgment highlighted the Court's duty to closely examine the FIR, taking into account the attending circumstances and materials collected during the investigation. The Court clarified that its observations were limited to the specific case and would not impact other pending proceedings.

Supreme Court allowed the appeal, quashing the criminal proceedings against the appellant based on the FIR. The verdict underscored the importance of specific and credible allegations for sustaining criminal cases, ensuring fairness and justice in the legal process.

Date of Decision: August 08, 2023

HAJI IQBAL @ BALA    vs STATE OF U.P. & ORS.

Latest Legal News