Section 9 A&C Act Relief Available Until Award Is Actually Enforced, Even After It Becomes Enforceable: Telangana High Court Matrimonial Litigations Must Not Degenerate Into Contests Of Mutual Humiliation By Weaponising Private Images: Delhi High Court Unarmed Witnesses’ Inaction Against Armed Assailants Justified By Instinct Of Self-Preservation; Testimony Cannot Be Discarded: Allahabad High Court Ocular Evidence Outweighs Motive: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Murder Conviction Based On Reliable Eyewitness Testimony Arrest Illegal If Written 'Grounds Of Arrest' Not Furnished To Accused; Communication Of Mere 'Reasons' Insufficient: Bombay High Court Absence Of Territorial Jurisdiction No Ground To Quash FIR At Threshold If Allegations Disclose Cognizable Offence: Calcutta High Court Proof Of Demand Is Sine Qua Non For PC Act Conviction; Voice Recordings Inadmissible Without Sec 65-B Certificate: Chhattisgarh HC Section 91 IEA | Disposition Of Immovable Property Cannot Be Proved By Oral Evidence If Written Document Not Produced: Delhi High Court NRC Legacy Data Extracts Inadmissible Without Section 65B Certificate; PAN Card & EPIC Not Proof Of Citizenship: Gauhati High Court Testimony Of Injured Witness Entitled To Great Weight; Minor Contradictions Due To Lapse Of Memory Cannot Discard Prosecution Case: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 164 CrPC Statement Recorded Without Procedural Safeguards Or 'Cooling-Off' Period Not A Valid Confession: Jharkhand High Court Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Investigation Is At A Nascent Stage If Custodial Interrogation Is Not Indispensable: Telangana High Court Actual Pay Drawn During Last 10 Months Must Be Basis For Pension Calculation, Regardless Of Notional Pay In Parent Bank: Punjab & Haryana High Court Kerala High Court Remands Teacher Seniority Dispute For Fresh Consideration To Verify If Senior Teacher Relinquished Promotion Claim Receipt Of DNA Report After Testimony Doesn't Automatically Confer Right To Recall Witness For Further Cross-Examination: Madhya Pradesh High Court Possession Of 'Bhang' Not An Offence Under NDPS Act, Specific Definition Excludes It: Jharkhand High Court Acquits Man Trial Court Cannot Reject Request For Handwriting Expert Merely Because Signatures Are On Photocopies: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Supreme Court Quashes False FIR Against Appellant in Family Dispute Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


On 21 April 2023 , In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India quashed the FIR against Ritu Tomar in the case of Ritu Tomar v. State of U.P. and Others (Criminal Appeal No. 1210 of 2023). The Court observed that the report submitted by the jurisdictional police clearly stated that the incident projected by the complainant appeared to be false and that none of the villagers, including the neighbors of the complainant, had testified about the occurrence of any incident as claimed by him.

The case emerged from a family dispute between the appellant's sister, Rekha, and her husband, the complainant. Rekha had previously filed a petition for maintenance against her husband and also lodged an FIR against him for harassment and dowry demand. In response, the complainant filed an application under Section 156(3) of CrPC, alleging that the appellant and others had forcibly entered his house and assaulted him with a knife. However, the jurisdictional police investigated the matter and submitted a report stating that the incident had not occurred, and the complainant had filed the application on concocted and baseless facts.

Despite the police report, the trial court ordered the registration of the FIR against the appellant and others. The appellant then filed a petition under Section 482 of CrPC for quashing the FIR, which was dismissed by the High Court. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and quashed the proceedings against the appellant.

Ritu Tomar v. State of U.P

Latest Legal News