MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Supreme Court Quashes False FIR Against Appellant in Family Dispute Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


On 21 April 2023 , In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India quashed the FIR against Ritu Tomar in the case of Ritu Tomar v. State of U.P. and Others (Criminal Appeal No. 1210 of 2023). The Court observed that the report submitted by the jurisdictional police clearly stated that the incident projected by the complainant appeared to be false and that none of the villagers, including the neighbors of the complainant, had testified about the occurrence of any incident as claimed by him.

The case emerged from a family dispute between the appellant's sister, Rekha, and her husband, the complainant. Rekha had previously filed a petition for maintenance against her husband and also lodged an FIR against him for harassment and dowry demand. In response, the complainant filed an application under Section 156(3) of CrPC, alleging that the appellant and others had forcibly entered his house and assaulted him with a knife. However, the jurisdictional police investigated the matter and submitted a report stating that the incident had not occurred, and the complainant had filed the application on concocted and baseless facts.

Despite the police report, the trial court ordered the registration of the FIR against the appellant and others. The appellant then filed a petition under Section 482 of CrPC for quashing the FIR, which was dismissed by the High Court. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and quashed the proceedings against the appellant.

Ritu Tomar v. State of U.P

Latest Legal News