Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

Supreme Court Quashes Defamation Proceedings Against 'Sunday Blast' Owner, Upholds Freedom of Speech

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court yesterday quashed the defamation proceedings against Sanjay Upadhya, the owner of the newspaper 'Sunday Blast'. The apex court upheld the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression while setting aside the orders of the High Court and the Sessions Court.

The bench comprising Justices B.R. Gavai and Sandeep Mehta emphasized the importance of the fundamental right under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution in their decision. “We are also of the view that the news article in question was published in good faith and in exercise of the Fundamental Right of Freedom of Speech and Expression enshrined under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India,” the bench observed.

The case stemmed from a complaint filed by Anand Dubey, alleging that the publication of a particular article in 'Sunday Blast' had tarnished his reputation, thereby constituting criminal defamation under Section 500 of the IPC. The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Hoshangabad, initially rejected the complaint, but this was later overturned by the Additional Sessions Judge and upheld by the Madhya Pradesh High Court, leading to the present appeal.

In their judgment, the Supreme Court noted that the order passed by the learned Magistrate First Class, Hoshangabad, was well-reasoned and did not warrant interference by the higher courts. The Court observed, "The learned Magistrate in its order referred to the Fundamental Right of Freedom of Speech and Expression enshrined under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India and held that the publication in question did not warrant prosecution of the accused appellant for the offence punishable under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860."

The Court’s decision to quash the proceedings marks a reaffirmation of the right to freedom of speech and expression in the context of journalistic pursuits. The appeal was thus allowed, and all proceedings initiated against Sanjay Upadhya under Section 500 of the IPC were quashed.

Date of Decision: 29th January 2024

SANJAY UPADHYA VS  ANAND DUBEY

 

Latest Legal News