Procedural Lapses and Prolonged Incarceration Justify Bail Under NDPS Act: Bombay High Court Mere Non-Deposit of Sale Balance Is Not Fatal to Specific Performance Claims: Andhra High Court Justice Requires Insurance Company to Pay and Recover: Calcutta High Court on Fatal Accident Case IBC Moratorium Nullifies Vicarious Liability Under Section 138 of NI Act: Delhi High Court Fraud Unravels All: Partition Decree Set Aside for Suppressing Rights of Co-Owners: Madras High Court Matters of Evidence Must Be Examined at Trial, Not Preemptively Quashed: Kerala High Court Declines Quashment Leave Encashment Is a Property Right and Cannot Be Denied Without Statutory Authority: Gujarat High Court Widow's Right to Deceased Husband’s Property Ceases Upon Remarriage Before 1956: Himachal Pradesh High Court No Reassessment of Departmental Inquiries by Courts, Orders Interest on Delayed GPF Payments: P&H High Court Investigations Initiated Before BNSS, 2023, Must Proceed Under Cr.P.C., 1973: Rajasthan High Court Third-Party Objector’s Locus Standi in Criminal Cases Must Have a Bona Fide Connection: Madhya Pradesh High Court Amendments After Trial Commences Barred Without Demonstration of Due Diligence - Contradictory Claims Cannot Be Permitted: Punjab & Haryana High Court Double Presumption of Innocence in Appeals Against Acquittals Must Be Respected: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Acquittal in Rape and Carnal Intercourse Case Provisional Release Not Prejudice Revenue Interests: Kerala High Court Permits Provisional Release of Seized Goods Under GST Act GST Registration Cannot Be Cancelled Retrospectively Without Objective Criteria:  Delhi High Court Neither the Statutory Framework nor Lease Terms Compel Conveyance of Property: Supreme Court Owner Can Avoid Confiscation Under NDPS by Proving Lack of Knowledge or Connivance in Illicit Use of Vehicle: Supreme Court Court is Expert of Experts: High Court Upholds Right to Rebuttal Evidence in Will Dispute Exceptional Circumstances Warrant Use of Inherent Powers to Reduce Sentences in Non-Compoundable Offenses: Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Defamation Proceedings Against 'Sunday Blast' Owner, Upholds Freedom of Speech

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court yesterday quashed the defamation proceedings against Sanjay Upadhya, the owner of the newspaper 'Sunday Blast'. The apex court upheld the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression while setting aside the orders of the High Court and the Sessions Court.

The bench comprising Justices B.R. Gavai and Sandeep Mehta emphasized the importance of the fundamental right under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution in their decision. “We are also of the view that the news article in question was published in good faith and in exercise of the Fundamental Right of Freedom of Speech and Expression enshrined under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India,” the bench observed.

The case stemmed from a complaint filed by Anand Dubey, alleging that the publication of a particular article in 'Sunday Blast' had tarnished his reputation, thereby constituting criminal defamation under Section 500 of the IPC. The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Hoshangabad, initially rejected the complaint, but this was later overturned by the Additional Sessions Judge and upheld by the Madhya Pradesh High Court, leading to the present appeal.

In their judgment, the Supreme Court noted that the order passed by the learned Magistrate First Class, Hoshangabad, was well-reasoned and did not warrant interference by the higher courts. The Court observed, "The learned Magistrate in its order referred to the Fundamental Right of Freedom of Speech and Expression enshrined under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India and held that the publication in question did not warrant prosecution of the accused appellant for the offence punishable under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860."

The Court’s decision to quash the proceedings marks a reaffirmation of the right to freedom of speech and expression in the context of journalistic pursuits. The appeal was thus allowed, and all proceedings initiated against Sanjay Upadhya under Section 500 of the IPC were quashed.

Date of Decision: 29th January 2024

SANJAY UPADHYA VS  ANAND DUBEY

 

Similar News