Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Forgery Case, Orders Return of Funds in Family Dispute

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant decision, the Supreme Court of India quashed the criminal proceedings against the accused in a forgery case, citing the larger interest of the parties involved. The bench comprising Justices M.R. Shah and Krishna Murari emphasized the importance of amicable resolution in family disputes and ordered the return of the withdrawn funds to the complainant. The judgment, delivered on March 24, 2023, sets a precedent for addressing similar cases in the future.

The case revolved around allegations of forgery concerning disputed signatures on a joint bank account. The accused, Hemantbhai Balvantbhai Patel and another person, were charged with forging the complainant's signature and subsequently withdrawing a substantial sum from the account. Despite efforts for an amicable resolution, the dispute remained unresolved, leading to the criminal proceedings.

During the proceedings, the appellants presented a Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) report that supported their claim, suggesting a match between the disputed signatures and the complainant's genuine signatures on other documents. The appellants expressed their willingness to return the entire amount to the complainant, with the aim of restoring cordial relations within the family.

Considering the relationship between the parties involved and the failure of previous courts to discharge the accused, the Supreme Court formed a prima facie opinion favoring the quashing of the criminal proceedings. Justice M.R. Shah, delivering the judgment, stated, "To continue the criminal proceedings against the appellants would not be in the larger interest of the parties." The court also took into account the report of the FSL and the disputed documents, further strengthening its decision to quash the proceedings against the appellants.

In line with the court's ruling, the appellants were ordered to return the withdrawn amount, along with 12% simple interest, to the complainant within one week. Furthermore, the criminal proceedings against the complainant, arising from a separate FIR filed by the appellants, were also quashed to foster cordial relations among the family members.

By invoking Article 142 of the Indian Constitution, the court exercised its powers to achieve a just resolution in the best interest of all parties involved. The decision will serve as a guiding principle in similar cases, emphasizing the importance of reconciliation and harmony within families.

Date of Decision: March 24, 2023

Hemantbhai Balvantbhai Patel and Another  vs The State of Gujarat and Another 

Latest Legal News