Ocular Evidence Prevails Over Medical Findings: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Despite Negative Semen Report & Police Lapses High Court Cannot Pass Inconsistent Orders: Supreme Court Quashes Demolition Order Passed Despite Earlier Restraint In CMDA Regularisation Dispute Supreme Court Upholds Validity Of Open University Degrees Obtained Prior To 2017 Cut-Off Must Be A Polluter Before Being Held Absolutely Liable: Supreme Court Sets Aside NGT Order Against Art Of Living Over Yamuna Event, Orders ₹5 Cr Refund Father Cannot Be Deprived Of Minor's Custody Unless Proved Unfit: Allahabad High Court Hands Over 4-Yr-Old Child To Father, Sets Aside Trial Court Order Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Integral To Personal Liberty': Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Bail As 24 Witnesses Remain Unexamined No Specific Chemical Opinion That Seized Substance Was Ganja: Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal Under Section 2(iii)(b) NDPS Act Mere Pendency Of Criminal Cases Simplicitor No Ground For Externment': Karnataka High Court Quashes Raichur SDM Order Order VI Rule 16 CPC | Defendants Enjoy Greater Latitude In Altering Defence: Punjab & Haryana High Court Explains Doctrinal Leeway Under CPC Boarding Running Train Not Self-Inflicted Injury: Delhi High Court Sets Aside Order Denying Compensation Possession Of One Co-Sharer Is Possession Of All: J&K&L High Court Cannot Invoke Article 226 For Registering FIR Or Restoring Water Supply: Kerala High Court Natural Guardian's Sale Of Minor's Property Without Court Nod Is Voidable, Extinguishes If Not Challenged Within 3 Years Of Majority: Madras High Court Orissa High Court Rejects Cancer-Survivor Husband's Plea To Transfer Maintenance Case Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Defect In Served Copy Of Affidavit Not Fatal: Supreme Court Restores Election Petition Challenging Lok Sabha Poll Result, Clarifies Law On Form-25 Attestation

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Forgery Case, Orders Return of Funds in Family Dispute

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant decision, the Supreme Court of India quashed the criminal proceedings against the accused in a forgery case, citing the larger interest of the parties involved. The bench comprising Justices M.R. Shah and Krishna Murari emphasized the importance of amicable resolution in family disputes and ordered the return of the withdrawn funds to the complainant. The judgment, delivered on March 24, 2023, sets a precedent for addressing similar cases in the future.

The case revolved around allegations of forgery concerning disputed signatures on a joint bank account. The accused, Hemantbhai Balvantbhai Patel and another person, were charged with forging the complainant's signature and subsequently withdrawing a substantial sum from the account. Despite efforts for an amicable resolution, the dispute remained unresolved, leading to the criminal proceedings.

During the proceedings, the appellants presented a Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) report that supported their claim, suggesting a match between the disputed signatures and the complainant's genuine signatures on other documents. The appellants expressed their willingness to return the entire amount to the complainant, with the aim of restoring cordial relations within the family.

Considering the relationship between the parties involved and the failure of previous courts to discharge the accused, the Supreme Court formed a prima facie opinion favoring the quashing of the criminal proceedings. Justice M.R. Shah, delivering the judgment, stated, "To continue the criminal proceedings against the appellants would not be in the larger interest of the parties." The court also took into account the report of the FSL and the disputed documents, further strengthening its decision to quash the proceedings against the appellants.

In line with the court's ruling, the appellants were ordered to return the withdrawn amount, along with 12% simple interest, to the complainant within one week. Furthermore, the criminal proceedings against the complainant, arising from a separate FIR filed by the appellants, were also quashed to foster cordial relations among the family members.

By invoking Article 142 of the Indian Constitution, the court exercised its powers to achieve a just resolution in the best interest of all parties involved. The decision will serve as a guiding principle in similar cases, emphasizing the importance of reconciliation and harmony within families.

Date of Decision: March 24, 2023

Hemantbhai Balvantbhai Patel and Another  vs The State of Gujarat and Another 

Latest Legal News