Special Appeal Maintainable If Single Judge's Order Relates To Authority Acting Without Statutory Appellate Jurisdiction: Allahabad High Court Recall Of Witness For Cross-Examination Permissible On Newly Framed Issue Post-Remand Even If Disposal Timeline Is Fixed: Karnataka High Court Litigant Cannot Overcome Law Of Limitation By Shifting Blame On Counsel Through Inconsistent Stands: Madras High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Preventive Detention Not Warranted If Person Can Be Dealt With Under Ordinary Laws; No Effort To Arrest In Pending Cases: Supreme Court Accused Languishing In Jail For 9 Years Deserves Bail; Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Violated: Supreme Court Election Disputes Must Be Resolved Expeditiously; Long Stays Render Adjudication A Mockery Of Justice: Madras High Court Delhi High Court Suspends LOC, Permits Businessman To Travel Abroad For Healthcare Conferences; Cites Roots In Society & Past Compliance Section 138 NI Act Complaint Not Maintainable By Third Party Who Is Neither Payee Nor Holder In Due Course: Allahabad High Court Writ Petition Cannot Be Dismissed On ‘Forum Non Conveniens’ If Respondent's Office Is Within Court's Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Supreme Court Doubts 'Sajjan Singh' Ruling; Refers To Larger Bench Whether Third Judge Can Re-examine Unanimous Findings Under Section 392 CrPC SARFAESI Sale Vitiated If Balance 75% Bid Amount Is Paid Beyond 15 Days Without Written Extension Agreement: Supreme Court Delhi High Court Can't Refuse Writ Petition Against BSF Dismissal Merely Because Cause Of Action Arose Outside Delhi: Supreme Court Private Rights Must Yield To Public Interest: Andhra Pradesh High Court Directs Removal Of Encroachments On Public Road Review Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked To Re-Agitate Factual Disputes Or Seek Re-Hearing On Merits: Allahabad High Court Recovery Under Section 27 Evidence Act Vitiated If Police Already Present At Spot Before Arrival Of Panch Witnesses: Bombay High Court Mere Non-Compliance Or Delay In Procedure Under Section 52A NDPS Act Is An Irregularity, Not An Illegality Entitling Accused To Bail: Calcutta High Court Recovery Of Weapon Used In Commission Of Offence Not A Sine Qua Non For Conviction If Ocular Evidence Is Corroborated: Allahabad High Court Seized Vehicles Shouldn't Be Kept Idle To Rot In Police Stations, Utility Vanishes Due To Stagnation: Karnataka High Court Or 39 CPC | Trial Court Erred In Dismissing Injunction Application Despite Respondent's 'No Objection' To Restraining Share Transfer: Gauhati High Court Issuing NBW Merely For Absence Of Accused Already On Bail Is Improper; Liberty Cannot Be Dealt With Lightly: Orissa High Court 138 NI | Expert Examination Of Disputed Documents Essential For Just Adjudication If Complainant Denies Handwriting & Signatures: Rajasthan High Court Order 41 Rule 27 CPC Cannot Be Invoked To Fill Lacunae In Evidence If Party Voluntarily Closed Evidence In Trial Court: Delhi High Court

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Forgery Case, Orders Return of Funds in Family Dispute

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant decision, the Supreme Court of India quashed the criminal proceedings against the accused in a forgery case, citing the larger interest of the parties involved. The bench comprising Justices M.R. Shah and Krishna Murari emphasized the importance of amicable resolution in family disputes and ordered the return of the withdrawn funds to the complainant. The judgment, delivered on March 24, 2023, sets a precedent for addressing similar cases in the future.

The case revolved around allegations of forgery concerning disputed signatures on a joint bank account. The accused, Hemantbhai Balvantbhai Patel and another person, were charged with forging the complainant's signature and subsequently withdrawing a substantial sum from the account. Despite efforts for an amicable resolution, the dispute remained unresolved, leading to the criminal proceedings.

During the proceedings, the appellants presented a Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) report that supported their claim, suggesting a match between the disputed signatures and the complainant's genuine signatures on other documents. The appellants expressed their willingness to return the entire amount to the complainant, with the aim of restoring cordial relations within the family.

Considering the relationship between the parties involved and the failure of previous courts to discharge the accused, the Supreme Court formed a prima facie opinion favoring the quashing of the criminal proceedings. Justice M.R. Shah, delivering the judgment, stated, "To continue the criminal proceedings against the appellants would not be in the larger interest of the parties." The court also took into account the report of the FSL and the disputed documents, further strengthening its decision to quash the proceedings against the appellants.

In line with the court's ruling, the appellants were ordered to return the withdrawn amount, along with 12% simple interest, to the complainant within one week. Furthermore, the criminal proceedings against the complainant, arising from a separate FIR filed by the appellants, were also quashed to foster cordial relations among the family members.

By invoking Article 142 of the Indian Constitution, the court exercised its powers to achieve a just resolution in the best interest of all parties involved. The decision will serve as a guiding principle in similar cases, emphasizing the importance of reconciliation and harmony within families.

Date of Decision: March 24, 2023

Hemantbhai Balvantbhai Patel and Another  vs The State of Gujarat and Another 

Latest Legal News