MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Forgery Case, Orders Return of Funds in Family Dispute

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant decision, the Supreme Court of India quashed the criminal proceedings against the accused in a forgery case, citing the larger interest of the parties involved. The bench comprising Justices M.R. Shah and Krishna Murari emphasized the importance of amicable resolution in family disputes and ordered the return of the withdrawn funds to the complainant. The judgment, delivered on March 24, 2023, sets a precedent for addressing similar cases in the future.

The case revolved around allegations of forgery concerning disputed signatures on a joint bank account. The accused, Hemantbhai Balvantbhai Patel and another person, were charged with forging the complainant's signature and subsequently withdrawing a substantial sum from the account. Despite efforts for an amicable resolution, the dispute remained unresolved, leading to the criminal proceedings.

During the proceedings, the appellants presented a Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) report that supported their claim, suggesting a match between the disputed signatures and the complainant's genuine signatures on other documents. The appellants expressed their willingness to return the entire amount to the complainant, with the aim of restoring cordial relations within the family.

Considering the relationship between the parties involved and the failure of previous courts to discharge the accused, the Supreme Court formed a prima facie opinion favoring the quashing of the criminal proceedings. Justice M.R. Shah, delivering the judgment, stated, "To continue the criminal proceedings against the appellants would not be in the larger interest of the parties." The court also took into account the report of the FSL and the disputed documents, further strengthening its decision to quash the proceedings against the appellants.

In line with the court's ruling, the appellants were ordered to return the withdrawn amount, along with 12% simple interest, to the complainant within one week. Furthermore, the criminal proceedings against the complainant, arising from a separate FIR filed by the appellants, were also quashed to foster cordial relations among the family members.

By invoking Article 142 of the Indian Constitution, the court exercised its powers to achieve a just resolution in the best interest of all parties involved. The decision will serve as a guiding principle in similar cases, emphasizing the importance of reconciliation and harmony within families.

Date of Decision: March 24, 2023

Hemantbhai Balvantbhai Patel and Another  vs The State of Gujarat and Another 

Latest Legal News