Section 164 CrPC Statement Recorded Without Procedural Safeguards Or 'Cooling-Off' Period Not A Valid Confession: Jharkhand High Court Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Investigation Is At A Nascent Stage If Custodial Interrogation Is Not Indispensable: Telangana High Court Actual Pay Drawn During Last 10 Months Must Be Basis For Pension Calculation, Regardless Of Notional Pay In Parent Bank: Punjab & Haryana High Court Limitation For Redemption Of Usufructuary Mortgage Starts Only When Mortgage Money Is Paid Or Tendered: Allahabad High Court Exclusion Of Natural Heir From Will Not A Suspicious Circumstance If Execution Is Duly Proved: Punjab & Haryana High Court Right To Travel Abroad Is A Basic Human Right; Permission Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Visit Is For 'Social Or Celebratory' Purpose: Andhra Pradesh High Court Citizen Cannot Be Externed Merely For Raising Grievances Against Government Decisions: Bombay High Court Lack Of Opportunity To Cross-Examine Partition Commissioner Does Not Vitiate Final Decree; Report Is Part Of Record: Calcutta High Court Section 27 Evidence Act Recoveries Inadmissible If Police Had Prior Knowledge Of Location Before Recording Disclosure: Delhi High Court Foreigners Act | Burden Of Proof To Establish Citizenship Solely On Proceedee, Never Shifts; Prescription For Parkinson's No Proof Of Mental Illness To Explain Testimony Contradictions: Gauhati High Court Trial Court Erred In Abating Suit While Application To Bring Legal Heirs On Record Was Pending: Gujarat High Court Places Of Worship Act 1991 Not A Shield Against Land Acquisition By State For Public Purpose: Allahabad High Court Unregistered Partition Deed Creating New Rights In Immovable Property Inadmissible In Evidence: Himachal Pradesh High Court Illiteracy No Excuse For Filing False Income Tax Returns, Court Must Presume Culpable Mental State Under Section 278E: Jharkhand High Court Trial Court Must Consider Convenience Of Family & Accused's Right To Assist Counsel While Deciding Jail Shifting Applications: J&K High Court Investigation Substantially Complete, Offence Carries Max 7 Years Jail: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail To Police Officers In Corruption Case Buyer's Knowledge Of Title Defect Doesn't Extinguish Statutory Warranty Of Title Unless Sale Deed Specifically Excludes It: Kerala High Court Madras High Court Sets Aside Appointment Of PAs To Judges, Says Relaxation Of Qualifications Via Circular Violates Article 14 BNSS | Mere Allegation Of Calling Deceased To Spot Not Sufficient To Deny Bail To Woman If Charge Sheet Filed: Orissa High Court Amendment To Rectify Property Description In Agreement To Sell Can Be Allowed At Any Stage Of Specific Performance Suit: Delhi High Court NDPS | Confession Before Police Cannot Be Sole Basis For Prosecution: Telangana High Court Grants Bail No Judicial Sanctity For Adulterous Relationships: J&K High Court Refuses To Quash Abduction FIR Involving Married Woman Habitual Offender Accused Of Brutal Murder Of SC Community Member Denied Bail: Kerala High Court Prosecution Fails To Prove Murder Charge As Recovery Witnesses Turn Hostile: Uttarakhand High Court Acquits Man Acquittal In Criminal Case Based On Benefit Of Doubt Does Not Automatically Absolve Employee From Disciplinary Liability: Madhya Pradesh High Court Punjab & Haryana HC Quashes FIR Against Woman For Dressing Pet Dog As Lord Krishna Personal Laws Cannot Be Used As Shield To Commit Gang Rape Under Garb Of Nikah Halala: Allahabad High Court

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Forgery Case, Orders Return of Funds in Family Dispute

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant decision, the Supreme Court of India quashed the criminal proceedings against the accused in a forgery case, citing the larger interest of the parties involved. The bench comprising Justices M.R. Shah and Krishna Murari emphasized the importance of amicable resolution in family disputes and ordered the return of the withdrawn funds to the complainant. The judgment, delivered on March 24, 2023, sets a precedent for addressing similar cases in the future.

The case revolved around allegations of forgery concerning disputed signatures on a joint bank account. The accused, Hemantbhai Balvantbhai Patel and another person, were charged with forging the complainant's signature and subsequently withdrawing a substantial sum from the account. Despite efforts for an amicable resolution, the dispute remained unresolved, leading to the criminal proceedings.

During the proceedings, the appellants presented a Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) report that supported their claim, suggesting a match between the disputed signatures and the complainant's genuine signatures on other documents. The appellants expressed their willingness to return the entire amount to the complainant, with the aim of restoring cordial relations within the family.

Considering the relationship between the parties involved and the failure of previous courts to discharge the accused, the Supreme Court formed a prima facie opinion favoring the quashing of the criminal proceedings. Justice M.R. Shah, delivering the judgment, stated, "To continue the criminal proceedings against the appellants would not be in the larger interest of the parties." The court also took into account the report of the FSL and the disputed documents, further strengthening its decision to quash the proceedings against the appellants.

In line with the court's ruling, the appellants were ordered to return the withdrawn amount, along with 12% simple interest, to the complainant within one week. Furthermore, the criminal proceedings against the complainant, arising from a separate FIR filed by the appellants, were also quashed to foster cordial relations among the family members.

By invoking Article 142 of the Indian Constitution, the court exercised its powers to achieve a just resolution in the best interest of all parties involved. The decision will serve as a guiding principle in similar cases, emphasizing the importance of reconciliation and harmony within families.

Date of Decision: March 24, 2023

Hemantbhai Balvantbhai Patel and Another  vs The State of Gujarat and Another 

Latest Legal News