Second Appeal is Not a Forum for Rehearing or Reassessment of Evidence: Andhra Pradesh High Court Dismisses Partition Suit Appeal Failure of Justice Must Be Proved, Not Assumed: Calcutta High Court Upholds Murder Conviction Despite Charge Framing Lapse Bail is the Rule, Refusal is an Exception – Right to Liberty Cannot Be Ignored: Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Ivory Coast National in NDPS Case Courts Must Adopt a Justice-Oriented Approach in Matrimonial Cases: Gauhati High Court Condones Delay in Family Court Appeal FIR Quashing | Breath Analyzer Test Alone Cannot Prove Alcohol Consumption: Patna High Court Quashes FIR Under Bihar Prohibition Law Unregistered Writing Cannot Confer Ownership: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Dispute Allegations of Stalking and Criminal Intimidation Must Be Tested at Trial: Gujarat High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Nestlé Officials Over Maggi Noodles Controversy No Shortcuts in NDPS Investigations – J&K High Court Rebukes Casual Approach of Investigating Officers Sessions Court Cannot Order Re-Investigation: Allahabad High Court Quashes Direction Against Jaypee Hospital If Official Witnesses Are Reliable, Independent Corroboration Is Not a Must:  Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds NDPS Conviction No Service Tax Can Be Levied on Sale of Lottery Tickets: Supreme Court Rules That Lottery Distributors Are Not Agents Courts Cannot Be Silent Spectators When Justice Is Denied Due to Procedural Errors:  Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Recall of Bail Rejection Order Section 27 of the Evidence Act Requires Independent Corroboration—Mere Claims by Police Are Not Enough: Supreme Court on Flawed Investigation Confession to Police Is No Confession in Law: Supreme Court Acquits Man, Citing Inadmissibility of Statements Made in Custody Mere 'Last Seen Together' Is Not Enough for Conviction Unless It Forms a Complete Chain of Circumstantial Evidence: Supreme Court Sets Aside Life Sentence in 16-Year-Old Girl’s Murder Failure to Explain Wife’s Death Strengthens Guilt Under Section 106 of Evidence Act" – Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case Child Witness Testimony Cannot Be Discarded Solely on Grounds of Tutoring: Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against ISKCON Leaders, Citing Abuse of Process of Law

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India has quashed the criminal proceedings initiated against two International Society for Krishna Consciousness (ISKCON) leaders. The Court, while exercising its power under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.), ruled that the prosecution constituted an abuse of the court's process and lacked merit.

The case pertained to a complaint filed by the ISKCON Kolkata branch, alleging the theft of a luxury bus in 2001. The complaint accused the appellants, Chanchalpati Das (Vice President of ISKCON, Bengaluru) and Madhupandit Das (President of ISKCON, Bengaluru), of theft, criminal breach of trust, and forgery. The complaint further claimed that the bus had been taken to Bengaluru by the accused.

The High Court at Kolkata had previously dismissed the Criminal Revision Applications filed by the appellants seeking the quashing of the charge-sheet. However, upon review, the Supreme Court found that the complaint had been filed after an unexplained delay of eight years, which it deemed a misuse and abuse of the court's process. The Court also noted the absence of substantive evidence to support the allegations against the accused.

The Supreme Court emphasized that the powers under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. should be exercised sparingly and with caution. Referring to the landmark case of State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal, the Court reiterated the guidelines for quashing proceedings, including instances where the allegations do not constitute an offense or are absurd and improbable. The Court held that the allegations made against the appellants fell within these categories, with no prima facie case established against them.

Furthermore, the Court expressed concern over the proliferation of frivolous litigation and emphasized the need to deter litigants from engaging in such practices. It observed that the misuse and abuse of the legal process impede the timely hearing of genuine cases. The Court stressed the importance of imposing exemplary costs on parties involved in frivolous litigation.

Supreme Court quashed the criminal proceedings pending against the appellants in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alipore, arising from the FIR registered at Ballygunge Police Station. The Court also directed the respondent-complainant to deposit a sum of Rs. 1,00,000 with the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association as exemplary costs.

D.D.18.May.2023

CHANCHALPATI DAS vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ANR.     

Similar News