Kerala High Court Denies Relief To Petitioner Suppressing Facts, Orders Enquiry Into Allotment Of Govt Scheme Houses On Puramboke Land Candidate Missing Physical Test For Minor Illness Has No Enforceable Right To Rescheduling: Supreme Court Prolonged Incarceration And Parity Constitute Valid Grounds For Regular Bail: Supreme Court Accused In Cheque Bounce Cases Cannot File Evidence-In-Chief By Affidavit Under Section 145 NI Act: Orissa High Court Borrowers Have No Right To Personal Hearing Before Fraud Classification, But Full Forensic Audit Report Must Be Supplied: Supreme Court Pendency Of Matrimonial Dispute With General Allegations Not A Valid Ground To Deny Public Employment: Allahabad High Court Minimum Five Persons Mandatory To Prove 'Preparation For Dacoity' Under Section 399 IPC: Gujarat High Court Suit For Specific Performance Not Maintainable Without Prayer To Set Aside Termination Of Agreement: Madras High Court Trial Court Must Indicate Material Forming Basis Of Charge, Mechanical Framing Of Charges Impermissible: Madhya Pradesh High Court Gated Community Association Cannot Exclude LIG/EWS Allottees, Single Unified Society Mandatory: Telangana High Court Voluntary Retirement Deemed Accepted If Positive Order Of Refusal Is Not Communicated Within Notice Period: Supreme Court Court Cannot Convict One Accused And Acquit Another On Same Evidence: Supreme Court Acquits Murder Convict Suspicion Cannot Replace Proof: Supreme Court Acquits Murder Convict Due To Unreliable Last-Seen Evidence And Principle Of Parity 138 NI Act | Accused Cannot Rebut Presumption Of Legally Enforceable Debt At Pre-Trial Stage In Cheque Bounce Cases: Supreme Court More Meritorious PWD Candidates From Reserved Categories Can Claim Unreserved PWD Posts In Open Competition: Supreme Court Meritorious Reserved Candidates Can Claim Unreserved Horizontal Vacancies Based On Merit: Supreme Court Employee Not Entitled To Gratuity Until Conclusion Of Both Departmental And Criminal Proceedings: Supreme Court Stamp Duty Recovery Against Legal Heirs Is Strictly Limited To The Extent Of Inherited Estate: Allahabad High Court Single Lathi Blow On Head During Sudden Altercation Amounts To Culpable Homicide Under Section 304 Part II IPC, Not Murder: Madhya Pradesh High Court Habeas Corpus Maintainable For Child Custody Against Father; Cannot Be Dismissed Merely Due To Alternate Remedy: Allahabad High Court "Plea Of Ignorance In Digital Era Inexcusable": Punjab & Haryana HC Imposes Rs 10K Cost On Accused For Hiding Prior Bail Dismissal Discrepancies In Name And Age On Monthly Pass Fail To Establish 'Bona Fide Passenger' Status In Railway Accident Claim: Delhi High Court "Last Seen" Theory A Weak Link If Time Gap Is Wide: Bombay High Court Acquits Man Sentenced To Life For Murder Failure To Conduct Pre-Anaesthetic Check-Up Prima Facie Amounts To Gross Medical Negligence Under Section 304A IPC: Kerala High Court Gujarat High Court Bans AI From Judicial Decision-Making, Lays Down Strict Policy for Court Use of Artificial Intelligence

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against ISKCON Leaders, Citing Abuse of Process of Law

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India has quashed the criminal proceedings initiated against two International Society for Krishna Consciousness (ISKCON) leaders. The Court, while exercising its power under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.), ruled that the prosecution constituted an abuse of the court's process and lacked merit.

The case pertained to a complaint filed by the ISKCON Kolkata branch, alleging the theft of a luxury bus in 2001. The complaint accused the appellants, Chanchalpati Das (Vice President of ISKCON, Bengaluru) and Madhupandit Das (President of ISKCON, Bengaluru), of theft, criminal breach of trust, and forgery. The complaint further claimed that the bus had been taken to Bengaluru by the accused.

The High Court at Kolkata had previously dismissed the Criminal Revision Applications filed by the appellants seeking the quashing of the charge-sheet. However, upon review, the Supreme Court found that the complaint had been filed after an unexplained delay of eight years, which it deemed a misuse and abuse of the court's process. The Court also noted the absence of substantive evidence to support the allegations against the accused.

The Supreme Court emphasized that the powers under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. should be exercised sparingly and with caution. Referring to the landmark case of State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal, the Court reiterated the guidelines for quashing proceedings, including instances where the allegations do not constitute an offense or are absurd and improbable. The Court held that the allegations made against the appellants fell within these categories, with no prima facie case established against them.

Furthermore, the Court expressed concern over the proliferation of frivolous litigation and emphasized the need to deter litigants from engaging in such practices. It observed that the misuse and abuse of the legal process impede the timely hearing of genuine cases. The Court stressed the importance of imposing exemplary costs on parties involved in frivolous litigation.

Supreme Court quashed the criminal proceedings pending against the appellants in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alipore, arising from the FIR registered at Ballygunge Police Station. The Court also directed the respondent-complainant to deposit a sum of Rs. 1,00,000 with the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association as exemplary costs.

D.D.18.May.2023

CHANCHALPATI DAS vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ANR.     

Latest Legal News