Delay in Test Identification & Absence of Motive Fatal to Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man for Murder Tokre Koli or Dhor Koli – Both Stand on Same Legal Footing: Bombay High Court Slams Scrutiny Committee for Disregarding Pre-Constitutional Records Consent Is No Defence When Victim Is Under 16: Delhi High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Granting Pre-Arrest Bail in Minor Rape Cases Would Send a Harmful Societal Signal: Delhi High Court Refuses Anticipatory Bail to Accused Citing POCSO’s Rigorous Standards Void Marriage No Shield Against Cruelty Charges: Karnataka High Court Affirms Section 498A Applies Even In Deceptive and Void Marital Relationships Consolidation Authorities Cannot Confer Ownership Or Alter Scheme Post Confirmation Without Due Process: Punjab & Haryana High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Jurisdiction Over Void Post-Scheme Orders Litigation Policy is Not Law, Can’t Enforce Guidelines Through Courts: Rajasthan High Court Refuses to Entertain Quo Warranto Against Additional Advocate General’s Appointment Police and Lawyers Are Two Limbs of Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance in Police Misconduct Incident Sole Testimony, Forensic Gaps, and Withheld Witness: No Conviction Possible: Delhi High Court Affirms Acquittal in Murder Trial Remand Keeps the Dispute Alive – Not Arrears: Bombay High Court Holds SVLDRS Relief Must Be Computed Under Litigation Category Daughter’s Right Extinguished When Partition Effected Prior to 2005 Amendment: Madras High Court Trial Courts Cannot Direct Filing of Challan After Conviction — Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Directions Against DSP Veer Singh Rule 4 Creates Parity, Not a Parallel Pension Pipeline: Rajasthan High Court Denies Dual Pension to Ex-Chief Justice Serving as SHRC Chairperson Right to Be Heard Must Be Preserved Where Claim Has a Legal Basis: Orissa High Court Upholds Impleadment of Will Beneficiary in Partition Suit Long-Term Ad Hocism Is Exploitation, Not Employment: Orissa High Court Orders Regularization Of Junior Typist After 25 Years Of Service PIL Cannot Be a Tool for Personal Grievances: Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Body’s Power to Revise Property Tax After 16 Years Omission of Accused’s Name by Eyewitness in FIR is a Fatal Lacuna: Supreme Court Acquits Man Convicted of Murder Correction In Revenue Map Under Section 30 Isn’t A Tool To Shift Plot Location After 17 Years: Supreme Court Quashes High Court’s Remand Casteist Abuses Must Be In Public View: Supreme Court Quashes SC/ST Act Proceedings Where Alleged Insults Occurred Inside Complainant’s House Resignation Bars Pension, But Not Gratuity: Supreme Court Draws Sharp Line Between Voluntary Retirement and Resignation in DTC Employee Case

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against ISKCON Leaders, Citing Abuse of Process of Law

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India has quashed the criminal proceedings initiated against two International Society for Krishna Consciousness (ISKCON) leaders. The Court, while exercising its power under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.), ruled that the prosecution constituted an abuse of the court's process and lacked merit.

The case pertained to a complaint filed by the ISKCON Kolkata branch, alleging the theft of a luxury bus in 2001. The complaint accused the appellants, Chanchalpati Das (Vice President of ISKCON, Bengaluru) and Madhupandit Das (President of ISKCON, Bengaluru), of theft, criminal breach of trust, and forgery. The complaint further claimed that the bus had been taken to Bengaluru by the accused.

The High Court at Kolkata had previously dismissed the Criminal Revision Applications filed by the appellants seeking the quashing of the charge-sheet. However, upon review, the Supreme Court found that the complaint had been filed after an unexplained delay of eight years, which it deemed a misuse and abuse of the court's process. The Court also noted the absence of substantive evidence to support the allegations against the accused.

The Supreme Court emphasized that the powers under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. should be exercised sparingly and with caution. Referring to the landmark case of State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal, the Court reiterated the guidelines for quashing proceedings, including instances where the allegations do not constitute an offense or are absurd and improbable. The Court held that the allegations made against the appellants fell within these categories, with no prima facie case established against them.

Furthermore, the Court expressed concern over the proliferation of frivolous litigation and emphasized the need to deter litigants from engaging in such practices. It observed that the misuse and abuse of the legal process impede the timely hearing of genuine cases. The Court stressed the importance of imposing exemplary costs on parties involved in frivolous litigation.

Supreme Court quashed the criminal proceedings pending against the appellants in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alipore, arising from the FIR registered at Ballygunge Police Station. The Court also directed the respondent-complainant to deposit a sum of Rs. 1,00,000 with the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association as exemplary costs.

D.D.18.May.2023

CHANCHALPATI DAS vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ANR.     

Latest Legal News