Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Sudden Quarrel over Mound of Earth — Not Murder but Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court Eligibility Flows from Birth, Not a Certificate Date: Delhi High Court Strikes Down Rule Fixing Arbitrary Cut-Off for OBC-NCL Certificates in CAPF (AC) Recruitment Bar Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Invoked Where Specific Performance Was Legally Premature Due To Statutory Impediments: P&H High Court Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity

Supreme Court Quashed FIR against Husband in Suicide Case - Lack of Evidence

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the Supreme Court of India has quashed proceedings against the accused in a landmark judgment delivered today. The case, Criminal Appeal No.901 of 2017, revolved around the jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) and challenges to proceedings pending under Sections 417, 498(A), 306, 406, and 201 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The apex court granted special leave and examined the matter meticulously before arriving at its decision.

The core issue of the case centered around the evidence required to establish suicide under Section 306 of the IPC. In its ruling, the court observed, “To attract the ingredients of Section 306 IPC, there must be evidence to substantiate the existence of suicide. It should be followed by abetment, as required under Section 107 of the IPC. The court found no merit in the evidence put forth to substantiate suicide, highlighting the deceased’s health issues and apparent marital discord. Consequently, the proceedings were quashed due to lack of material evidence under Section 306 IPC.

Another crucial aspect that emerged from the judgment was the importance of prompt complaint by a police officer complainant. The court questioned the delayed complaint, which was made only after the cremation, raising doubts about its validity. The court noted, “The de facto complainant being a police officer himself has not given a complaint promptly after the death. On the contrary, he himself performed the cremation the next day, and gave the complaint on 18.04.2009.”

The court, in its wisdom, acquitted the accused due to insufficient material evidence and lack of proof of suicide. Consequently, the appeals by the de facto complainant against the accused were dismissed. The court allowed Criminal Appeal No. 901, thereby setting aside the impugned judgment of the High Court.

Date of Decision: 9th August, 2023

YADDANAPUDI MADHUSUDHANA RAO  vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ORS

Latest Legal News