Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Supreme Court Bars Post-Divorce Maintenance Claims When Wife Voluntarily Waived Maintenance In Settlement Agreement Advocate Is An Officer Of Court, Not Mere Agent Of Client: Allahabad High Court Distinguishes Between Active Concealment & Statement In Ignorance, Slaps Cost On Litigants For Misleading Bench Cannot Summon Accused Mechanically On Protest Petition Without Assigning Justifiable Reasons: Andhra Pradesh High Court Increment Not A Bounty: Allahabad High Court Rules Public Holiday Cannot Delay Pay Hike For Teachers Joining Next Working Day Paying Taxes Or Utility Connections Confer No Legal Ownership Over Govt Land': Andhra Pradesh High Court Orders Demolition Of Encroachment 'Cannot Compel Public Authority To Collect Data From Private Bodies': Bombay High Court Quashes CIC Orders Directing SEBI To Procure BSE Records Under RTI Act Section 10 CPC Cannot Stay Previously Instituted Title Suit Pending Subsequent Probate Case; Inherent Powers Under Section 151 Inapplicable When Probate Dismissed: Calcutta High Court Mere Phone Calls Without Transcripts No Ground For Murder Conspiracy: Delhi High Court Clear Violation Of Section 42 NDPS Act': Gujarat High Court Holds Failure To Record Secret Info In Writing Fatal When Police Officer Had Time To Act JK High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Cop Accused Of Threatening Advocate Over Phone Call Without Prior Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC Custody Unwarranted For Mere Formalities Once Weapon Is Recovered: Kerala High Court Grants Regular Bail In BNS Axe Attack Case Circumstances Of Crime Can Be Assessed During Trial: High Court Upholds Trial Of Minor As Adult Under JJ Act In Murder Case Statutory Deposit Under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC Is A Sine Qua Non; Litigant Cannot Stall Auction Sale By Merely Blaming Counsel: Madras High Court Ban Junk Food Within 50 Metres Of Schools: Rajasthan High Court Takes Suo Moto Cognizance To Enforce FSSAI Norms, Protect Children From Obesity

Supreme Court Orders Refund of Advance in Property Deal: Equitable and in the Interest of Justice

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a property dispute, the Supreme Court of India, led by Justices Vikram Nath and Satish Chandra Sharma, granted a significant relief to the appellant in a prolonged property dispute. The apex court ordered the respondents to refund an advance payment of Rs. 40,00,000 to Devika Real Estate, the appellant in the case.

The dispute centered around an agreement to sell a property made in 2006, where Devika Real Estate alleged having paid Rs. 40,14,500 as an advance. However, the respondents, including M/s Moksha Buildtech Pvt Ltd, contested this amount, admitting to receiving only Rs. 23 lakhs.

The original suit filed by Devika Real Estate was dismissed under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC), on grounds of lack of accrued cause of action. The Supreme Court, upon reviewing the case, issued notice limited to the aspect of the refund of the claimed amount.

In a critical observation, the Supreme Court noted, "Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, we feel that whatever be the terms and conditions, it would be equitable and in the interest of justice that the appellant would be entitled to receive the advance amount paid by him along with some interest as the said amount had remained with respondent nos. 2 to 6 for a substantial time of about 18 years."

The Court's decision takes into account the long duration for which the respondents held the advance amount. This ruling emphasizes the judiciary's commitment to ensuring fairness and justice in commercial transactions.

The Court's directive for the respondents to refund Rs. 40,00,000 within eight weeks marks a significant conclusion to this legal battle, highlighting the importance of honoring financial commitments in property dealings.

Date of Decision: 18th January 2024

DEVIKA REAL ESTATE VS M/S MOKSHA BUILDTECH PVT LTD AND ORS.

 

Latest Legal News