MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Supreme Court Orders Demolition of Unauthorized Constructions; Grants Time for Removal of Belongings

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court today directed the demolition of unauthorized constructions in a case involving the Lucknow Development Authority (LDA), while also allowing time for the removal of belongings.

Legal Point of Judgement: The crux of the judgment revolves around the demolition of unauthorized constructions on government/LDA owned land. The court focused on the legality of the constructions and the rights of the occupants, particularly those not classified under the Economically Weaker Section (EWS).

Facts and Issues: The case arose from the impugned judgment dated 27th February 2024, in which 24 commercial or commercial-cum-residential establishments were ordered to be demolished. The Supreme Court noted that 23 of these had already been demolished. The petitioner, Vishnu Swaroop Chaurasia, was among those affected by this order. The key issue was the legality of the constructions on the land owned by the government/LDA and the right to alternative accommodation for eligible persons.

Court Assessment: The Court observed, “The constructions, therefore, will be unauthorized and illegal.” It acknowledged that the land in question is owned by the government/LDA and not by the petitioners. The bench comprising Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dipankar Datta emphasized the need for adherence to legal constructions and the provision of alternative accommodation for eligible persons. The Court directed, “Vishnu Swaroop Chaurasia will be entitled to remove his belongings on or before midnight of 04.03.2024.” Furthermore, the Court instructed the LDA to take photographs and list the belongings before and after demolition, ensuring a record is kept.

Decision: The Court ordered the demolition of the unauthorized property post-midnight of 4th March 2024, while allowing time for occupants to remove their belongings. It was also directed that this order would apply to 23 other similar cases, provided the parties abide by the order and give an undertaking to the LDA. The Court disposed of the special leave petition with these directions.

Date of Decision: 29th February 2024

Vishnu Swaroop Chaurasia vs. State of U.P. & Ors.

Latest Legal News