Recovery Of Excess Payment Made By Mistake Is Permissible When Employee Furnished An Undertaking To Refund: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail Application Under Sec 482 BNSS Is Maintainable Even If No Formal Order Of Arrest Is Passed By CGST Authorities: Allahabad High Court Consensual Physical Relationship Following Three-Year Courtship Does Not Amount To Rape If Marriage Promise Fails: Supreme Court Criminalization Of Civil Disputes | Courts Must Not Engage In Speculative Reasoning While Dealing With Quashing Petitions Under Section 482 CrPC: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money In The Absence Of Proof Of Demand Is Insufficient To Sustain Conviction Under Section 7 And 13 PC Act: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Quash NDPS Proceedings Merely Relying On Jurisprudence Regarding Evidentiary Value Of Confessional Statements: Supreme Court Extra-Judicial Confession Made While In Police Custody Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Supreme Court Taxing Authorities Must Levy Tax Based On The Form Of Goods At The Time Of Sale, Not On Potential End Use: Supreme Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders CBI Probe Into State Corruption Scams After Punjab Police Fails To Act On ED’s Section 66(2) PMLA Referral Section 482 CrPC | FIR Based On Consensual Relationship Gone Sour Cannot Be Sustained To Coerce Marriage: Supreme Court CISF Personnel Soliciting Bribes For Employment Is Guilty Of 'Gross Misconduct' Under Section 18 CISF Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court PIL | State Cannot Use Demolition Powers To Silence Whistleblowers Or Deflect Accountability: Punjab & Haryana High Court Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws Without Specific Allegations Of Overt Acts Constitute Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 9 CPC | Admission In An Abated Suit Does Not Constitute Estoppel Against Landlord In A Fresh Eviction Proceeding: Calcutta High Court Arbitral Award Cannot Be Set Aside For Non-Adjudication Of Claims Specifically Abandoned By Parties: Delhi High Court Mere Long Possession Is Not Adverse Possession; Defendant Must Prove Hostile Animus To Deny Title Of True Owner: Himachal Pradesh High Court Reopening Of Assessment Under Sec 148A(d) Income Tax Act Cannot Be Based On 'Change Of Opinion' Without Fresh Tangible Material: Gujarat High Court Municipal Authorities Must Initiate Formal Proceedings And Grant Opportunity Of Hearing Before Sealing Premises:  Jharkhand High Court Court Cannot Compel Third-Party To Undergo DNA Test Unless Necessary For Just Adjudication: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Cannot Defer Bail Application Merely Because A Transfer Petition Is Pending In High Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 108 BNS | Mere Taunts Or Harassment Regarding Not Bearing A Male Child Do Not Constitute Abetment To Suicide: Rajasthan High Court

Supreme Court Orders Demolition of Unauthorized Constructions; Grants Time for Removal of Belongings

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court today directed the demolition of unauthorized constructions in a case involving the Lucknow Development Authority (LDA), while also allowing time for the removal of belongings.

Legal Point of Judgement: The crux of the judgment revolves around the demolition of unauthorized constructions on government/LDA owned land. The court focused on the legality of the constructions and the rights of the occupants, particularly those not classified under the Economically Weaker Section (EWS).

Facts and Issues: The case arose from the impugned judgment dated 27th February 2024, in which 24 commercial or commercial-cum-residential establishments were ordered to be demolished. The Supreme Court noted that 23 of these had already been demolished. The petitioner, Vishnu Swaroop Chaurasia, was among those affected by this order. The key issue was the legality of the constructions on the land owned by the government/LDA and the right to alternative accommodation for eligible persons.

Court Assessment: The Court observed, “The constructions, therefore, will be unauthorized and illegal.” It acknowledged that the land in question is owned by the government/LDA and not by the petitioners. The bench comprising Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dipankar Datta emphasized the need for adherence to legal constructions and the provision of alternative accommodation for eligible persons. The Court directed, “Vishnu Swaroop Chaurasia will be entitled to remove his belongings on or before midnight of 04.03.2024.” Furthermore, the Court instructed the LDA to take photographs and list the belongings before and after demolition, ensuring a record is kept.

Decision: The Court ordered the demolition of the unauthorized property post-midnight of 4th March 2024, while allowing time for occupants to remove their belongings. It was also directed that this order would apply to 23 other similar cases, provided the parties abide by the order and give an undertaking to the LDA. The Court disposed of the special leave petition with these directions.

Date of Decision: 29th February 2024

Vishnu Swaroop Chaurasia vs. State of U.P. & Ors.

Latest Legal News