Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Supreme Court Orders Demolition of Unauthorized Constructions; Grants Time for Removal of Belongings

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court today directed the demolition of unauthorized constructions in a case involving the Lucknow Development Authority (LDA), while also allowing time for the removal of belongings.

Legal Point of Judgement: The crux of the judgment revolves around the demolition of unauthorized constructions on government/LDA owned land. The court focused on the legality of the constructions and the rights of the occupants, particularly those not classified under the Economically Weaker Section (EWS).

Facts and Issues: The case arose from the impugned judgment dated 27th February 2024, in which 24 commercial or commercial-cum-residential establishments were ordered to be demolished. The Supreme Court noted that 23 of these had already been demolished. The petitioner, Vishnu Swaroop Chaurasia, was among those affected by this order. The key issue was the legality of the constructions on the land owned by the government/LDA and the right to alternative accommodation for eligible persons.

Court Assessment: The Court observed, “The constructions, therefore, will be unauthorized and illegal.” It acknowledged that the land in question is owned by the government/LDA and not by the petitioners. The bench comprising Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dipankar Datta emphasized the need for adherence to legal constructions and the provision of alternative accommodation for eligible persons. The Court directed, “Vishnu Swaroop Chaurasia will be entitled to remove his belongings on or before midnight of 04.03.2024.” Furthermore, the Court instructed the LDA to take photographs and list the belongings before and after demolition, ensuring a record is kept.

Decision: The Court ordered the demolition of the unauthorized property post-midnight of 4th March 2024, while allowing time for occupants to remove their belongings. It was also directed that this order would apply to 23 other similar cases, provided the parties abide by the order and give an undertaking to the LDA. The Court disposed of the special leave petition with these directions.

Date of Decision: 29th February 2024

Vishnu Swaroop Chaurasia vs. State of U.P. & Ors.

Latest Legal News