Safety Shoes Used as Weapon Meets Mens Rea Requirement for Murder: Rajasthan HC on Bail Denial    |     Right to Be Considered for Promotion, Not a Right to Promotion: Supreme Court Clarifies Eligibility for Retrospective Promotion    |     Inherent Power of Courts Can Recall Admission of Insufficiently Stamped Documents: Supreme Court    |     Courts Cannot Substitute Their Opinion for Security Agencies in Threat Perception Assessments: J&K High Court Directs Reassessment of Political Leader's Threat Perception    |     Service Law | Violation of Natural Justice: Discharge Without Notice or Reason: Gauhati High Court Orders Reinstatement and Regularization of Circle Organizers    |     Jharkhand High Court Quashes Family Court Order, Reaffirms Jurisdiction Based on Minor’s Ordinary Residence in Delhi    |     Ex-Serviceman Status Ceases After First Employment in Government Job: Calcutta High Court Upholds SBI’s Cancellation of Ex-Serviceman's Appointment Over False Declaration of Employment    |     Maxim Res Ipsa Loquitur Applies When State Instrumentalities Are Directly Responsible: Delhi High Court Orders MCD to Pay ₹10 Lakhs Compensation for Death    |     Wilful Avoidance of Service Must Be Established Before Passing Ex Parte Order Under Section 126(2) CrPC: Patna High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Maintenance Order    |     MP High Court Imposes Rs. 10,000 Costs for Prolonging Litigation, Upholds Eviction of Petitioners from Father's Property    |     When Detention Unnecessary Despite Serious Allegations of Fraud Bail Should be Granted: Kerala HC    |     Magistrate's Direction for Police Inquiry Under Section 202 CrPC Is Valid; Petitioner Must Await Investigation Outcome: Bombay High Court Dismisses Advocate's Petition as Premature    |     Relocation Alone Cannot Justify Transfer: Supreme Court Rejects Plea to Move Case from Nellore to Delhi, Orders Fresh Probe    |     Punjab & Haryana HC Double Bench Upholds Protection for Married Partners in Live-In Relationships, Denies Same for Minors    |     Tribunal’s Compensation Exceeding Claimed Amount Found Just and Fair Under Motor Vehicles Act: No Deduction Errors Warrant Reduction: Gujrat High Court    |     Smell of Alcohol in Post-Mortem Insufficient to Establish Intoxication: Rajasthan High Court Upholds Liability of Insurance Company in Motor Accident Case    |     No Grounds for Transfer: Free Bus Fare for Women in Telangana Reduces Travel Burden: Telangana High Court Rejects Wife's Petition to Transfer Divorce Case    |     Mechanical Referrals Invalid: "Deputy Registrar Must Apply Judicial Mind: Allahabad HC Quashes Deputy Registrar's Order in Arya Pratinidhi Sabha Election Dispute    |    

Supreme Court Orders Demolition of Unauthorized Constructions; Grants Time for Removal of Belongings

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court today directed the demolition of unauthorized constructions in a case involving the Lucknow Development Authority (LDA), while also allowing time for the removal of belongings.

Legal Point of Judgement: The crux of the judgment revolves around the demolition of unauthorized constructions on government/LDA owned land. The court focused on the legality of the constructions and the rights of the occupants, particularly those not classified under the Economically Weaker Section (EWS).

Facts and Issues: The case arose from the impugned judgment dated 27th February 2024, in which 24 commercial or commercial-cum-residential establishments were ordered to be demolished. The Supreme Court noted that 23 of these had already been demolished. The petitioner, Vishnu Swaroop Chaurasia, was among those affected by this order. The key issue was the legality of the constructions on the land owned by the government/LDA and the right to alternative accommodation for eligible persons.

Court Assessment: The Court observed, “The constructions, therefore, will be unauthorized and illegal.” It acknowledged that the land in question is owned by the government/LDA and not by the petitioners. The bench comprising Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dipankar Datta emphasized the need for adherence to legal constructions and the provision of alternative accommodation for eligible persons. The Court directed, “Vishnu Swaroop Chaurasia will be entitled to remove his belongings on or before midnight of 04.03.2024.” Furthermore, the Court instructed the LDA to take photographs and list the belongings before and after demolition, ensuring a record is kept.

Decision: The Court ordered the demolition of the unauthorized property post-midnight of 4th March 2024, while allowing time for occupants to remove their belongings. It was also directed that this order would apply to 23 other similar cases, provided the parties abide by the order and give an undertaking to the LDA. The Court disposed of the special leave petition with these directions.

Date of Decision: 29th February 2024

Vishnu Swaroop Chaurasia vs. State of U.P. & Ors.

Similar News