Criminal Proceedings Cannot Be Used To Settle Civil Property Disputes: Calcutta High Court Quashes Trespass And Theft Case Victim’s Absence From WhatsApp Group Does Not Negate Insult To Modesty: Kerala High Court Refuses To Quash Case Over Obscene Posts Section 319 CrPC | Summoning Additional Accused Requires Evidence Stronger Than Prima Facie: Allahabad High Court Employer Cannot Plead Limitation When It Failed To Determine Gratuity: Bombay High Court On Employer’s Statutory Duty Under Section 7 Once Demand and Acceptance Are Proved, Burden Shifts to Accused: Delhi High Court Affirms Conviction of Police Officer in Bribery Case BUDS Act | Law Looks At The Substance Of The Transaction, Not Its Cosmetic Garb: Karnataka High Court Refuses To Quash FIR Against Digital Gold Platform Under Seniority Tied to Appointment, Not Selection: Delhi High Court Full Bench Resolves Long-standing Conflict in BSF Recruitment Seniority Disputes Calling Family Land "Ancestral" Is Not Enough — Must Trace Four Generations Of Male Lineage To Stop Father From Selling It: Punjab & Haryana HC Cannot Challenge a Document Bearing Your Own Signature By Staying Out of the Witness Box: Punjab & Haryana HC Dismisses Injunction Suit Solar Panel Installation Does Not Amount To Industrial Use, SIPCOT Can Resume Unutilised Land: Madras High Court Article 226 Is Not A Forum To Settle Boundary Wars: Kerala High Court Refuses To Entertain Plea For Retaining Wall In Munnar Landslide Dispute State Cannot Exploit A Workman For 30 Years And Deny Him Pension: Orissa High Court Orders Notional Regularisation Of DLR Watchman Wrote "Main Chor Hoon" On It With A Marker — And A Man Died: Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail Equivalency Cannot Override Statutory Mandate of Regular Study: Kerala High Court Sets Aside KAT Order on Librarian Recruitment No Saptapadi, No Marriage: Calcutta High Court Quashes Bigamy And Cruelty Case, Rules Stamp Paper Union Is Legal Nullity Under Hindu Marriage Act Revenue Authority Cannot Vest Land In State Under Section 79A, Suo Motu Proceedings After 11 Years Fatal: Gujarat High Court Campaigning During 48-Hour Silent Period Is Not 'Undue Influence' Under Section 123(2), Election Petition Must Plead How Result Was Materially Affected: Bombay High Court DVDs Carrying Encoded Data Infringe Patent Even If Stampers Are Outsourced: Delhi High Court in Philips’ DVD-ROM Patent Dispute Departmental Exoneration Does Not Bar Criminal Trial If Key Evidence Not Considered: Karnataka HC Refuses To Quash PSI’s Corruption Case Can't Claim Irrevocable License Under Section 60 Easements Act Without Pleading It First: Punjab & Haryana High Court Gurmeet Ram Rahim Acquitted in Journalist Murder Case, But Three Co-Accused Convicted: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Actual Shooters FSL Ballistic Evidence Cannot Be Discredited Years After Trial Merely Because Bullets Bear Different Seals: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Supreme Court Modifies Conviction Under Section 307 IPC to Sections 323 and 324 in Vellore Assault Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India has altered the conviction of two appellants, Sivamani and Dinesh Kumar, from Section 307 (attempt to murder) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) to Sections 323 and 324 (causing simple hurt). The judgment was passed on 28th November 2023, in the case of Sivamani and Anr. Vs. State Represented by Inspector of Police, Vellore Taluk Police Station, Vellore District, with the bench comprising Justices Vikram Nath and Ahsanuddin Amanullah.

This criminal appeal, numbered 3619 of 2023, originated from a Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.5136 of 2022. The appellants challenged the High Court’s affirmation of their conviction under Section 307 IPC and the reduction of their sentence from 10 years to 5 years Rigorous Imprisonment.

The case revolved around an assault incident stemming from a land dispute. The appellants, along with others, were accused of conspiring and attempting to murder the complainant (PW1) in his grocery shop, leading to the initial conviction under Section 307 IPC by the trial court.

In its detailed judgment, the Supreme Court highlighted that the injuries inflicted on the victims were simple and did not indicate an intent to kill, which is a requisite for conviction under Section 307 IPC. The Court, referring to precedents like State of Madhya Pradesh v Saleem and others, emphasized the importance of assessing the severity of injuries and the intent behind the act to ascertain the appropriateness of the charges.

Modifying the High Court’s judgment, the Supreme Court ruled that the conviction under Section 307 IPC was unsustainable and altered it to Sections 323 and 324 IPC. The sentence was reduced to the period already undergone by the appellants, and the imposed fine was maintained.

 Date of Decision: 28th November 2023

SIVAMANI AND ANR. VS STATE REPRESENTED BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

 

Latest Legal News