Wife Exaggerating Husband's Income In Maintenance Affidavit Is Not Perjury: Allahabad High Court Dismisses Husband's Section 340 Application Candidate Cannot Be Faulted For Missing Disclaimers In Form-26 Supplied By Returning Officer: Bombay High Court Dismissal Without Departmental Enquiry Violates Natural Justice When Criminal Conviction Is Set Aside: Chhattisgarh High Court Orders Reinstatement Cipla MD Gets Relief: Himachal Pradesh HC Quashes Drug Prosecution For Absence of Specific Averment on Day-to-Day Role Mandatory Notice Under Section 106(3) Railways Act Applies To 'Overcharges', Not 'Illegal Charges': Gauhati High Court Insurer Can't Escape Paying Accident Victims Even With Invalid Licence Defence — Avoidance Clause In Policy Seals Liability: Gujarat High Court Fraud Vitiates All Solemn Acts — Once A Claim Is Founded On Fraud, The Entire Edifice Of The Claim Collapses And No Relief Can Be Granted: Supreme Court Like Cases Must Be Decided Alike": Orissa High Court Directs State To Pay Service Benefits To Deceased Employee's Heirs Claiming Parity Ancient Jain Idol Cannot Remain In Police Custody Under Treasure Trove Act: Allahabad High Court Orders Transfer To Museum Income Tax | Receivables For Warranty Reimbursements Constitute An 'Asset' Under Section 153A For Reopening Assessment: Delhi High Court Married Persons Cannot Claim Police Protection For Live-In Relationships Without First Obtaining Divorce: Allahabad High Court Breach Of Private Compromise Cannot Ipso Facto Trigger Cancellation Of Probation Granted On Legally Sustainable Grounds: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Interference Under Article 226 In Eviction Proceedings When Land Compensation Is Deposited In Competent Court: Kerala High Court "Immediately Preceding Three Years" For Land Compensation Must Be Calculated From Date Of Section 11 Notification, Not Calendar Year: Jharkhand High Court Contributory Negligence Cannot Be Attributed To Minor Children; State Strictly Liable For Unsecured Hazardous Reservoirs: J&K High Court Party Seeking Transfer Can't Hide Pending Transfer Petition From High Court: Karnataka HC Quashes Transfer Order Mother Can Represent Muslim Minor As 'Next Friend' In Civil Suit As CPC Provisions Are Secular And Not Tied To Personal Law: Calcutta High Court First Appellate Court Must Frame Points For Determination Under Order XLI Rule 31 CPC, Cannot Remand Cryptically: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mere Recovery Of Stolen Property Cannot Be Sole Basis For Murder Conviction If Chain Of Circumstances Is Broken: Bombay High Court MP Constable's Shell Company, Rs.6.44 Crore Properties, Ghost Cooperative Society: HC Rejects PMLA Bail of Director Who Had 'No Financial Capability' To Buy What He Bought

Supreme Court Modifies Conviction Under Section 307 IPC to Sections 323 and 324 in Vellore Assault Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India has altered the conviction of two appellants, Sivamani and Dinesh Kumar, from Section 307 (attempt to murder) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) to Sections 323 and 324 (causing simple hurt). The judgment was passed on 28th November 2023, in the case of Sivamani and Anr. Vs. State Represented by Inspector of Police, Vellore Taluk Police Station, Vellore District, with the bench comprising Justices Vikram Nath and Ahsanuddin Amanullah.

This criminal appeal, numbered 3619 of 2023, originated from a Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.5136 of 2022. The appellants challenged the High Court’s affirmation of their conviction under Section 307 IPC and the reduction of their sentence from 10 years to 5 years Rigorous Imprisonment.

The case revolved around an assault incident stemming from a land dispute. The appellants, along with others, were accused of conspiring and attempting to murder the complainant (PW1) in his grocery shop, leading to the initial conviction under Section 307 IPC by the trial court.

In its detailed judgment, the Supreme Court highlighted that the injuries inflicted on the victims were simple and did not indicate an intent to kill, which is a requisite for conviction under Section 307 IPC. The Court, referring to precedents like State of Madhya Pradesh v Saleem and others, emphasized the importance of assessing the severity of injuries and the intent behind the act to ascertain the appropriateness of the charges.

Modifying the High Court’s judgment, the Supreme Court ruled that the conviction under Section 307 IPC was unsustainable and altered it to Sections 323 and 324 IPC. The sentence was reduced to the period already undergone by the appellants, and the imposed fine was maintained.

 Date of Decision: 28th November 2023

SIVAMANI AND ANR. VS STATE REPRESENTED BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

 

Latest Legal News