Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Supreme Court Institutionalizes CEC for Environmental Compliance, Stresses on ‘Effective, Accountable, Transparent Institutions’ – SC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment that promises to reshape the landscape of environmental governance in India, the Supreme Court of India, in the case of T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad versus Union of India and Others (Writ Petition (Civil) No. 202/1995), has institutionalized the Central Empowered Committee (CEC) as a permanent statutory body. The Bench, comprising Justices B.R. Gavai, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, and Prashant Kumar Mishra, underscored the necessity of “effective, accountable, and transparent institutions” in upholding environmental rule of law.

The Court, in its judgment, meticulously traced the evolution of the CEC from its inception as an ad hoc body in 2002 to its latest avatar following a notification by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change. This notification, issued under Section 3(3) of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, was approved by the Supreme Court, thus giving the CEC a permanent and statutory status.

The Bench observed, “Institutionalization means that these bodies must work in compliance with institutional norms of efficiency, integrity, and certainty.” The Court’s decision marks a significant step in ensuring rigorous monitoring and compliance with its orders on environmental, forest, and wildlife matters.

Furthering its commitment to environmental protection, the Court also emphasized the gap between the existence of environmental laws and their actual enforcement. This gap, the Court noted, directly affects fundamental human rights to a clean environment, intricately linked to the right to life.

Detailing the functions and powers of the newly institutionalized CEC, the Court’s judgment highlights its role in monitoring the implementation of Supreme Court’s orders related to environmental issues. The CEC is empowered to handle applications from aggrieved persons, call for documents, undertake site inspections, and make recommendations to the Central and State Governments for effective implementation of environmental laws.

In a comprehensive overview, the judgment also lists various environmental regulatory bodies in India, underscoring their crucial roles in environmental governance. The Court’s directive for regular and systematic audits of these bodies’ functioning signifies a move towards more transparent and accountable environmental governance.

Date of Decision: January 31, 2024

IN RE: T.N. GODAVARMAN THIRUMULPAD VS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

 

Latest Legal News