Delay in Test Identification & Absence of Motive Fatal to Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man for Murder Tokre Koli or Dhor Koli – Both Stand on Same Legal Footing: Bombay High Court Slams Scrutiny Committee for Disregarding Pre-Constitutional Records Consent Is No Defence When Victim Is Under 16: Delhi High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Granting Pre-Arrest Bail in Minor Rape Cases Would Send a Harmful Societal Signal: Delhi High Court Refuses Anticipatory Bail to Accused Citing POCSO’s Rigorous Standards Void Marriage No Shield Against Cruelty Charges: Karnataka High Court Affirms Section 498A Applies Even In Deceptive and Void Marital Relationships Consolidation Authorities Cannot Confer Ownership Or Alter Scheme Post Confirmation Without Due Process: Punjab & Haryana High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Jurisdiction Over Void Post-Scheme Orders Litigation Policy is Not Law, Can’t Enforce Guidelines Through Courts: Rajasthan High Court Refuses to Entertain Quo Warranto Against Additional Advocate General’s Appointment Police and Lawyers Are Two Limbs of Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance in Police Misconduct Incident Sole Testimony, Forensic Gaps, and Withheld Witness: No Conviction Possible: Delhi High Court Affirms Acquittal in Murder Trial Remand Keeps the Dispute Alive – Not Arrears: Bombay High Court Holds SVLDRS Relief Must Be Computed Under Litigation Category Daughter’s Right Extinguished When Partition Effected Prior to 2005 Amendment: Madras High Court Trial Courts Cannot Direct Filing of Challan After Conviction — Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Directions Against DSP Veer Singh Rule 4 Creates Parity, Not a Parallel Pension Pipeline: Rajasthan High Court Denies Dual Pension to Ex-Chief Justice Serving as SHRC Chairperson Right to Be Heard Must Be Preserved Where Claim Has a Legal Basis: Orissa High Court Upholds Impleadment of Will Beneficiary in Partition Suit Long-Term Ad Hocism Is Exploitation, Not Employment: Orissa High Court Orders Regularization Of Junior Typist After 25 Years Of Service PIL Cannot Be a Tool for Personal Grievances: Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Body’s Power to Revise Property Tax After 16 Years Omission of Accused’s Name by Eyewitness in FIR is a Fatal Lacuna: Supreme Court Acquits Man Convicted of Murder Correction In Revenue Map Under Section 30 Isn’t A Tool To Shift Plot Location After 17 Years: Supreme Court Quashes High Court’s Remand Casteist Abuses Must Be In Public View: Supreme Court Quashes SC/ST Act Proceedings Where Alleged Insults Occurred Inside Complainant’s House Resignation Bars Pension, But Not Gratuity: Supreme Court Draws Sharp Line Between Voluntary Retirement and Resignation in DTC Employee Case

"Supreme Court Holds Respondent Guilty of Contempt for Defiance of Orders in International Child Custody Dispute"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment delivered on May 16, 2023, the Supreme Court of India found Naveen Sharma guilty of contempt in Contempt Petition (C) Nos. 340­342 of 2022. The case involved an international child custody dispute, where the respondent, Naveen Sharma, failed to comply with the court's orders to bring back a child to India. Despite repeated opportunities given to rectify his actions, the respondent showed no signs of remorse and exhibited scant respect for the court's authority.

The respondent's claim of acting in the best interests of the child was also examined, with the court observing that he had inappropriately discussed pending litigations with the child, attempting to prejudice the child's mind against the petitioner.

Decision: In a stern response to the respondent's contumacious conduct, the court handed down a landmark judgment. Justice Abhay S. Oka sentenced Naveen Sharma to six months of simple imprisonment and imposed a fine of Rs. 25 lakhs. The court further ordered that failure to pay the fine within the stipulated time would result in an additional two months of imprisonment. The fine amount is to be deposited with the court registry and utilized for the welfare and benefit of the minor child involved in the custody dispute.

The court also directed the Government of India and the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to take all necessary and permissible steps to secure the contemnor's presence in India for serving the sentence and paying the fine.

Date of Decision: May 16, 2023.

Meenal Bhargava  vs Naveen Sharma & Ors.                      

 

Latest Legal News