Kerala High Court Denies Relief To Petitioner Suppressing Facts, Orders Enquiry Into Allotment Of Govt Scheme Houses On Puramboke Land Candidate Missing Physical Test For Minor Illness Has No Enforceable Right To Rescheduling: Supreme Court Prolonged Incarceration And Parity Constitute Valid Grounds For Regular Bail: Supreme Court Accused In Cheque Bounce Cases Cannot File Evidence-In-Chief By Affidavit Under Section 145 NI Act: Orissa High Court Borrowers Have No Right To Personal Hearing Before Fraud Classification, But Full Forensic Audit Report Must Be Supplied: Supreme Court Pendency Of Matrimonial Dispute With General Allegations Not A Valid Ground To Deny Public Employment: Allahabad High Court Minimum Five Persons Mandatory To Prove 'Preparation For Dacoity' Under Section 399 IPC: Gujarat High Court Suit For Specific Performance Not Maintainable Without Prayer To Set Aside Termination Of Agreement: Madras High Court Trial Court Must Indicate Material Forming Basis Of Charge, Mechanical Framing Of Charges Impermissible: Madhya Pradesh High Court Gated Community Association Cannot Exclude LIG/EWS Allottees, Single Unified Society Mandatory: Telangana High Court Voluntary Retirement Deemed Accepted If Positive Order Of Refusal Is Not Communicated Within Notice Period: Supreme Court Court Cannot Convict One Accused And Acquit Another On Same Evidence: Supreme Court Acquits Murder Convict Suspicion Cannot Replace Proof: Supreme Court Acquits Murder Convict Due To Unreliable Last-Seen Evidence And Principle Of Parity 138 NI Act | Accused Cannot Rebut Presumption Of Legally Enforceable Debt At Pre-Trial Stage In Cheque Bounce Cases: Supreme Court More Meritorious PWD Candidates From Reserved Categories Can Claim Unreserved PWD Posts In Open Competition: Supreme Court Meritorious Reserved Candidates Can Claim Unreserved Horizontal Vacancies Based On Merit: Supreme Court Employee Not Entitled To Gratuity Until Conclusion Of Both Departmental And Criminal Proceedings: Supreme Court Stamp Duty Recovery Against Legal Heirs Is Strictly Limited To The Extent Of Inherited Estate: Allahabad High Court Single Lathi Blow On Head During Sudden Altercation Amounts To Culpable Homicide Under Section 304 Part II IPC, Not Murder: Madhya Pradesh High Court Habeas Corpus Maintainable For Child Custody Against Father; Cannot Be Dismissed Merely Due To Alternate Remedy: Allahabad High Court "Plea Of Ignorance In Digital Era Inexcusable": Punjab & Haryana HC Imposes Rs 10K Cost On Accused For Hiding Prior Bail Dismissal Discrepancies In Name And Age On Monthly Pass Fail To Establish 'Bona Fide Passenger' Status In Railway Accident Claim: Delhi High Court "Last Seen" Theory A Weak Link If Time Gap Is Wide: Bombay High Court Acquits Man Sentenced To Life For Murder Failure To Conduct Pre-Anaesthetic Check-Up Prima Facie Amounts To Gross Medical Negligence Under Section 304A IPC: Kerala High Court Gujarat High Court Bans AI From Judicial Decision-Making, Lays Down Strict Policy for Court Use of Artificial Intelligence

"Supreme Court Holds Respondent Guilty of Contempt for Defiance of Orders in International Child Custody Dispute"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment delivered on May 16, 2023, the Supreme Court of India found Naveen Sharma guilty of contempt in Contempt Petition (C) Nos. 340­342 of 2022. The case involved an international child custody dispute, where the respondent, Naveen Sharma, failed to comply with the court's orders to bring back a child to India. Despite repeated opportunities given to rectify his actions, the respondent showed no signs of remorse and exhibited scant respect for the court's authority.

The respondent's claim of acting in the best interests of the child was also examined, with the court observing that he had inappropriately discussed pending litigations with the child, attempting to prejudice the child's mind against the petitioner.

Decision: In a stern response to the respondent's contumacious conduct, the court handed down a landmark judgment. Justice Abhay S. Oka sentenced Naveen Sharma to six months of simple imprisonment and imposed a fine of Rs. 25 lakhs. The court further ordered that failure to pay the fine within the stipulated time would result in an additional two months of imprisonment. The fine amount is to be deposited with the court registry and utilized for the welfare and benefit of the minor child involved in the custody dispute.

The court also directed the Government of India and the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to take all necessary and permissible steps to secure the contemnor's presence in India for serving the sentence and paying the fine.

Date of Decision: May 16, 2023.

Meenal Bhargava  vs Naveen Sharma & Ors.                      

 

Latest Legal News