Limitation Period For Specific Performance Starts From Date Of Refusal If No Fixed Date Stipulated In Agreement: Karnataka High Court Pensionary Benefits Not ‘Pecuniary Advantage’, Cannot Be Deducted From Income For Motor Accident Compensation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Propounder Faces Heavy Burden Of Proof When Testator Is Illiterate; Registration Does Not Cure Unexplained Suspicious Circumstances: Supreme Court Mother Killing Minor Children Over Husband's Refusal To Take Her To Workplace Is Murder, Not Culpable Homicide: Andhra Pradesh High Court Specific Performance Of Registered Agreement To Sell Is No Longer Discretionary Post-2018 Amendment: Allahabad High Court Civil Court Has Jurisdiction To Determine If Tenanted Property Belongs To Joint Family Even If Tenancy Order Stands In Individual Karta's Name: Bombay High Court Notice Under Section 107 BNSS Mandatory Before Attaching Property; Right To Property Is A Constitutional Right: Calcutta High Court Post-Cognizance Arrest 'Makes No Sense' If Investigation Completed Without Arrest: Delhi High Court Grants Bail Under BNSS Criminal Courts Cannot Be Used To Settle Civil Inheritance Disputes Over Appreciated Land Values: Gujarat High Court Quashes Fraud Case Accused Must Raise Probable Defence To Rebut Statutory Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act If Signatures Are Undisputed: Himachal Pradesh High Court Passing Departmental Exam Not A Pre-requisite For Grant Of ACP/MACP Benefits: Jharkhand High Court Convenience Of Family And Accused Paramount For Jail Shifting; Trial Court Can't Reject Application Merely For Non-Residency: J&K High Court Litigants Who Attempt To Pollute The Stream Of Justice With Tainted Hands Are Not Entitled To Any Relief: Karnataka High Court Trial Court Must Implement Modified Preliminary Decree In Full: Telangana High Court Directs Partition Of Property Omitted In Final Decree Proceedings If Grievance Is Real But Lies Before Different Forum, Plaint Should Be Returned Under Order VII Rule 10 CPC, Not Rejected: Rajasthan High Court Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Due To Severity Of Economic Offence If Evidence Is Documentary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Non-Compliance With Mandatory Duty To Inform Grounds Of Arrest Under Section 47 BNSS Is Impermissible: Orissa High Court Grants Bail Land Acquisition Award Finality Under Section 12 Is A Bar To Writ Petitions Challenging 'Public Necessity': Madhya Pradesh High Court State As Eminent Domain Is Obligated To Pay Adequate Compensation, Not Minimum To Suit Its Convenience: Madras High Court Kerala High Court Grants Emergency Parole To Life Convict To Execute Sale Deed, Repay Bank Loan To Prevent Family's Eviction High Court Cannot Act As Court Of First Instance In Service Matters Amenable To CAT Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court Election Tribunal Has No Jurisdiction To Declare Caste Certificate Forged, Authority Vests Solely With Scrutiny Committee: Allahabad High Court Order IX Rule 7 CPC Requires 'Good Cause' Not 'Sufficient Cause'; Trial Court Can't Apply Higher Threshold To Pre-Decree Proceedings: Telangana High Court Victim Cannot Maintain Appeal Seeking Enhancement Of Sentence Under Section 372 CrPC; Such Power Exclusively With State: Rajasthan High Court Disability Pension: Presumption In Favour Of Personnel If Found Fit At Enrollment; Percentage Must Be Rounded Off: Punjab & Haryana HC Employee Entitled To Second Kramonnati Benefit If Promotion To Higher Post Does Not Result In Higher Pay Scale: Madhya Pradesh High Court Borrowers Can Be Granted Opportunity To Clear Loan Overdues In Installments To Prevent Coercive Action Under SARFAESI Act: Kerala High Court

Supreme Court Halts Lok Sabha Privilege Committee Action Against West Bengal Officials

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin

The Supreme Court's interim order in Writ Petition (Civil) No.116/2024, dated 19-02-2024, encapsulates a significant legal principle: the balance between parliamentary privileges and the constitutional rights of individuals. This decision, staying proceedings of the Lok Sabha privilege committee against West Bengal officials, underlines the judiciary's role in safeguarding constitutional rights against potential overreach by parliamentary powers.

The petition by West Bengal officials, including the Chief Secretary and DGP/IGP, challenges Office Memoranda dated 15 February 2024, which demanded their presence before the Committee of Privileges. This legal battle is rooted in allegations of mistreatment by BJP MP Sukanta Majumdar against Bengal police. The central issue hinges on the extent to which parliamentary privileges can impinge upon the fundamental rights of state officials, especially in non-parliamentary contexts.

The bench, headed by the Chief Justice, took cognizance of the sensitive balance between legislative privileges and constitutional safeguards. Represented by Senior Advocates Kapil Sibal and Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, the petitioners argued against the applicability of parliamentary privileges in scenarios beyond the parliament's functions. The Court's interim order reflects a profound judicial scrutiny over the potential conflict between parliamentary authority and individual rights, emphasizing the need for constitutional harmony.

The Supreme Court's decision to stay further proceedings, as per the Office Memoranda, marks a critical intervention in preserving constitutional rights against possible legislative overreach. The stay, effective until the case's next listing on 22 March 2024, temporarily halts the Lok Sabha committee's actions, ensuring a deeper judicial examination of the involved privileges and rights.

Next Date 22 March 2024

BHAGWATI PRASAD GOPALIKA & ORS. versus LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT (PRIVILEGES AND ETHICS BRANCH) & ORS."

 

Latest Legal News

  • by sayum
    07 July 2026 3:12 PM
Trial Court Must Implement Modified Preliminary Decree In Full: Telangana High Court Directs Partition Of Property Omitted In Final Decree Proceedings
  • by sayum
    07 July 2026 3:12 PM
Litigants Who Attempt To Pollute The Stream Of Justice With Tainted Hands Are Not Entitled To Any Relief: Karnataka High Court
  • by sayum
    07 July 2026 3:12 PM
Convenience Of Family And Accused Paramount For Jail Shifting; Trial Court Can't Reject Application Merely For Non-Residency: J&K High Court
  • by sayum
    07 July 2026 3:12 PM
Passing Departmental Exam Not A Pre-requisite For Grant Of ACP/MACP Benefits: Jharkhand High Court
  • by sayum
    07 July 2026 3:11 PM
Accused Must Raise Probable Defence To Rebut Statutory Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act If Signatures Are Undisputed: Himachal Pradesh High Court
  • by sayum
    07 July 2026 10:48 AM
Criminal Courts Cannot Be Used To Settle Civil Inheritance Disputes Over Appreciated Land Values: Gujarat High Court Quashes Fraud Case