Section 164 CrPC Statement Recorded Without Procedural Safeguards Or 'Cooling-Off' Period Not A Valid Confession: Jharkhand High Court Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Investigation Is At A Nascent Stage If Custodial Interrogation Is Not Indispensable: Telangana High Court Actual Pay Drawn During Last 10 Months Must Be Basis For Pension Calculation, Regardless Of Notional Pay In Parent Bank: Punjab & Haryana High Court Limitation For Redemption Of Usufructuary Mortgage Starts Only When Mortgage Money Is Paid Or Tendered: Allahabad High Court Exclusion Of Natural Heir From Will Not A Suspicious Circumstance If Execution Is Duly Proved: Punjab & Haryana High Court Right To Travel Abroad Is A Basic Human Right; Permission Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Visit Is For 'Social Or Celebratory' Purpose: Andhra Pradesh High Court Citizen Cannot Be Externed Merely For Raising Grievances Against Government Decisions: Bombay High Court Lack Of Opportunity To Cross-Examine Partition Commissioner Does Not Vitiate Final Decree; Report Is Part Of Record: Calcutta High Court Section 27 Evidence Act Recoveries Inadmissible If Police Had Prior Knowledge Of Location Before Recording Disclosure: Delhi High Court Foreigners Act | Burden Of Proof To Establish Citizenship Solely On Proceedee, Never Shifts; Prescription For Parkinson's No Proof Of Mental Illness To Explain Testimony Contradictions: Gauhati High Court Trial Court Erred In Abating Suit While Application To Bring Legal Heirs On Record Was Pending: Gujarat High Court Places Of Worship Act 1991 Not A Shield Against Land Acquisition By State For Public Purpose: Allahabad High Court Unregistered Partition Deed Creating New Rights In Immovable Property Inadmissible In Evidence: Himachal Pradesh High Court Illiteracy No Excuse For Filing False Income Tax Returns, Court Must Presume Culpable Mental State Under Section 278E: Jharkhand High Court Trial Court Must Consider Convenience Of Family & Accused's Right To Assist Counsel While Deciding Jail Shifting Applications: J&K High Court Investigation Substantially Complete, Offence Carries Max 7 Years Jail: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail To Police Officers In Corruption Case Buyer's Knowledge Of Title Defect Doesn't Extinguish Statutory Warranty Of Title Unless Sale Deed Specifically Excludes It: Kerala High Court Madras High Court Sets Aside Appointment Of PAs To Judges, Says Relaxation Of Qualifications Via Circular Violates Article 14 BNSS | Mere Allegation Of Calling Deceased To Spot Not Sufficient To Deny Bail To Woman If Charge Sheet Filed: Orissa High Court Amendment To Rectify Property Description In Agreement To Sell Can Be Allowed At Any Stage Of Specific Performance Suit: Delhi High Court NDPS | Confession Before Police Cannot Be Sole Basis For Prosecution: Telangana High Court Grants Bail No Judicial Sanctity For Adulterous Relationships: J&K High Court Refuses To Quash Abduction FIR Involving Married Woman Habitual Offender Accused Of Brutal Murder Of SC Community Member Denied Bail: Kerala High Court Prosecution Fails To Prove Murder Charge As Recovery Witnesses Turn Hostile: Uttarakhand High Court Acquits Man Acquittal In Criminal Case Based On Benefit Of Doubt Does Not Automatically Absolve Employee From Disciplinary Liability: Madhya Pradesh High Court Punjab & Haryana HC Quashes FIR Against Woman For Dressing Pet Dog As Lord Krishna Personal Laws Cannot Be Used As Shield To Commit Gang Rape Under Garb Of Nikah Halala: Allahabad High Court

Supreme Court Grants Transfer of Matrimonial Case to Nagpur, Allows Video Conferencing for Respondent"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent verdict, the Supreme Court of India, comprising a bench of HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN, allowed the transfer of a significant family court case under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC). The case titled "SHWETA D SHAMKUWAR v. VINAY BORKAR" saw the petitioner, Shweta D Shamkuwar, seeking the relocation of her case from the Court of Principal Judge, (Family Court), Central District THC, Delhi, to the District Family Court at Nagpur, Maharashtra.

The Supreme Court's observation noted, "The petitioner has made out a case for transfer of the aforesaid petition," reflecting the court's decision to grant the transfer in the interest of justice. This move underscores the court's commitment to ensuring a fair and just legal process, acknowledging the circumstances and preferences of the parties involved.

Furthermore, the judgment also emphasized the importance of accommodating the respondent, Vinay Borkar, by reserving the liberty for him to appear through a video conferencing facility. The court declared that it would provide the necessary video conferencing facility if requested by the respondent.

In its final order, the Supreme Court allowed the transfer petition, directing the transfer of HMA case number 346/2023 to the District Family Court at Nagpur, Maharashtra. The court also noted that pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.

This verdict highlights the court's commitment to ensuring a fair and accessible legal process, taking into account the needs and circumstances of the parties involved. The provision for video conferencing reflects the court's adaptability in the modern age, making justice more accessible to all, even in cases with geographical disparities.

This judgment sets a precedent for the equitable and efficient handling of cases involving geographical challenges, ensuring that the pursuit of justice remains unhindered by logistical concerns.

Date of Decision: SEPTEMBER 27, 2023

SHWETA D SHAMKUWAR  vs VINAY BORKAR

Latest Legal News