MSME Award Cannot Be Challenged Under Article 226 To Avoid Mandatory Pre-Deposit Under Section 19: Allahabad High Court Electricity Company Strictly Liable For Death Due To Snapped Wire; Court Enhances Compensation Beyond Claimed Amount: Andhra Pradesh High Court MPID Act Has No Provision To Release Attached Property To Owner After Auction Order Is Passed: Bombay High Court Non-Service Of Requisition Order Doesn't Vitiate Land Acquisition; Section 3(2) Of 1948 Act Is Directory: Calcutta High Court Recovery Of Valid Journey Ticket From Deceased Is Strong Evidence Of Bona Fide Travel; Tribunal Can't Elevate Inference To Proof: Delhi High Court J&K High Court Quashes PSA Detention Of MLA; Says Public Servants’ Annoyance At Representative Raising Grievances Not ‘Public Disorder’ Vague Allegations Of Caste Abuse Without Mentioning Specific Caste Name Do Not Sustain Prima Facie Case Under SC/ST Act: Karnataka High Court Public Interest Litigation Not Maintainable In Service Matters: Madras High Court Dismisses Challenge To Reinstatement Of Panchayat Officials Choice Of Principal Is Absolute Right Of Minority Institutions, Seniority Cannot Be Imposed By State: Madhya Pradesh High Court Mutation Order Passed Without Notice To Parties Is Legally Unsustainable; Natural Justice Mandatory: Orissa High Court Right To Life Casts Obligation On State To Not Defeat Employee’s Medical Entitlements Through Technicalities: Punjab & Haryana High Court Registered Sale Deeds Presumed Valid; Specific Performance Of Oral Re-conveyance Agreement Requires Cogent Evidence: Kerala High Court Uttering 'F*** Off' During Work Spat Lacks Sexual Intent, Not Sexual Harassment Under Section 354-A IPC: Punjab & Haryana High Court High Court Cannot Implead State To Interpret Notifications In Private Litigations Under Article 227: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Act As Appellate Court Or Substitute Its Own View Under Article 227 Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Contradictory Dying Declaration Recorded After Tutoring Cannot Form Basis Of Conviction: Supreme Court Acquits Father-In-Law In Dowry Death Case Section 498A IPC Not A Weapon To Settle Grudges Against In-Laws Without Specific Evidence: Supreme Court Acquits Father-In-Law Physical Relationship For Years With Prior Knowledge Of Each Other's Marital Status Not Rape Under 'False Promise Of Marriage': Supreme Court

Supreme Court Grants Pay Protection To Lecturer Claim Against Academic Institution

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent ruling, the Supreme Court of India has resolved a pay protection dispute between a lecturer and an academic institution. The appellant, Asma Shaw, had been appointed as a Lecturer in English at The Islamia College of Science & Commerce, Srinagar Kashmir. The dispute arose over whether her appointment entitled her to pay protection. The case had been previously heard by a Single Judge of the Jammu & Kashmir High Court, who ruled in favor of the appellant. However, a Division Bench of the High Court overturned the decision, leading to the appeal being filed in the Supreme Court.

In the judgement authored by Justice Abhay S. Oka, the Supreme Court carefully examined the applicability of Article 77-D of the Jammu & Kashmir Civil Service Regulations and the nature of the appellant's appointment. The court emphasized the distinction between a tenure post and an appointment on a regular post with a tenure basis. The court also scrutinized the language used in the advertisement and terms of the appellant's appointment, finding indications that her post was substantive rather than ad-hoc.

Justice Oka, writing for the bench, stated, "The entire approach of the Division Bench was erroneous when it came to the conclusion that the appellant was not appointed on a substantive basis and, therefore, she does not satisfy the criteria laid down by Article 77-D." The judgement highlighted the exception carved out by the third proviso to Article 77-D and emphasized that the appellant's case did not fall within the scope of this exception.

Supreme Court set aside the Division Bench's decision and restored the Single Judge's judgment, directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to grant pay protection to the appellant within one month. Additionally, the court ordered the payment of arrears to the appellant within three months.

This ruling has significant implications for similar cases involving pay protection disputes and provides clarity on the interpretation of regulations related to such matters. The decision reaffirms the importance of careful consideration of the terms of appointment and relevant provisions when determining pay protection entitlements for government servants.

Date of Decision: August 08, 2023.

Asma Shaw vs The Islamia College of Science & Commerce Srinagar Kashmir & Ors.                                                  

Latest Legal News