Limitation | Delay Condonation Cannot Be An Act Of Generosity: Supreme Court Refuses To Condone 31-Year Delay To Challenge Decree Sentence Suspension In Murder Cases Only Under Exceptional Circumstances; Presumption Of Innocence Erased Upon Conviction: Supreme Court Inquiry Commission Report Cannot Be Used For Disciplinary Action If Statutory Right To Cross-Examine Denied: Gauhati High Court Use Of Trademark On Website Accessible In India Constitutes Domestic Use, Geo-Blocking Mandatory For Territorial Restrictions: Delhi High Court Civil Court Jurisdiction To Interfere With DRT Proceedings Is Absolutely Barred Even For Third Parties: Madras High Court Adding a Prefix Can’t Erase Deceptive Similarity – Delhi High Court Orders Removal of ‘ARUN’ from Trademark ‘AiC ARUN’ Cannot Resile From Mediated Settlement After Taking Benefits: Supreme Court Quashes Wife's DV Case, Grants Divorce Absolute Indemnity Obligation Triggers Immediately Upon Court-Directed Deposit, Not On Final Appeal: Supreme Court Magistrate Directing Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC Only Requires Prima Facie Satisfaction Of Cognizable Offence: Supreme Court Cancellation Of Sale Deed Under Specific Relief Act Not A Pre-Condition To Initiate Criminal Case For Forgery: Supreme Court Amalgamated Company Cannot Claim Set-Off Of Predecessor's Losses Under Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act Without Specific Statutory Provision: Supreme Court Overlapping Split Chargesheets May Raise Double Jeopardy Concerns, Supreme Court Notes While Granting Bail To Former Jharkhand Minister Supreme Court Grants Bail To Convicted Ex-Jharkhand Minister Facing Overlapping Prosecutions From Split Chargesheets Electricity Act Appellate Authority Is A Quasi-Judicial Body Subject To High Court’s Supervisory Jurisdiction: Madhya Pradesh High Court Mere Discrepancy In Date Of Birth Across Certificates Doesn't Amount To Fraud If No Undue Advantage Is Derived: Allahabad High Court Interest Earned On Funds Temporarily Parked Pending Project Deployment Cannot Be Taxed As 'Income From Other Sources': Delhi High Court Reference Court Cannot Set Aside Collector's Award Or Remand Matter For Fresh Determination: Allahabad High Court Administrative Transfer Causing Revenue Loss Defies Court Process: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Ferry Ghat Handover Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court

Supreme Court Grants Pay Protection To Lecturer Claim Against Academic Institution

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent ruling, the Supreme Court of India has resolved a pay protection dispute between a lecturer and an academic institution. The appellant, Asma Shaw, had been appointed as a Lecturer in English at The Islamia College of Science & Commerce, Srinagar Kashmir. The dispute arose over whether her appointment entitled her to pay protection. The case had been previously heard by a Single Judge of the Jammu & Kashmir High Court, who ruled in favor of the appellant. However, a Division Bench of the High Court overturned the decision, leading to the appeal being filed in the Supreme Court.

In the judgement authored by Justice Abhay S. Oka, the Supreme Court carefully examined the applicability of Article 77-D of the Jammu & Kashmir Civil Service Regulations and the nature of the appellant's appointment. The court emphasized the distinction between a tenure post and an appointment on a regular post with a tenure basis. The court also scrutinized the language used in the advertisement and terms of the appellant's appointment, finding indications that her post was substantive rather than ad-hoc.

Justice Oka, writing for the bench, stated, "The entire approach of the Division Bench was erroneous when it came to the conclusion that the appellant was not appointed on a substantive basis and, therefore, she does not satisfy the criteria laid down by Article 77-D." The judgement highlighted the exception carved out by the third proviso to Article 77-D and emphasized that the appellant's case did not fall within the scope of this exception.

Supreme Court set aside the Division Bench's decision and restored the Single Judge's judgment, directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to grant pay protection to the appellant within one month. Additionally, the court ordered the payment of arrears to the appellant within three months.

This ruling has significant implications for similar cases involving pay protection disputes and provides clarity on the interpretation of regulations related to such matters. The decision reaffirms the importance of careful consideration of the terms of appointment and relevant provisions when determining pay protection entitlements for government servants.

Date of Decision: August 08, 2023.

Asma Shaw vs The Islamia College of Science & Commerce Srinagar Kashmir & Ors.                                                  

Latest Legal News