Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court Illicit Affair Alone Cannot Make a Man Guilty of Abetting Suicide: Supreme Court Quashes Charge Under Section 306 IPC Landlord Cannot Be Punished for Slowness of Courts: Supreme Court on Bonafide Need in Eviction Suits Expect States To Enact Laws Regulating Unlicensed Money Lenders Charging Exorbitant Interest Contrary To 'Damdupat': Supreme Court Accused Who Skips Lok Adalat After Seeking It, Then Cries 'Prejudice', Cannot Claim Apprehension of Denial of Justice: Madras High Court Refuse To Transfer Case IO Cannot Act Without Prior Sanction: Gujarat High Court Grants Bail, Flags Procedural Lapse in Religious Conversion Case Electricity Board Strictly Liable For Unprotected Transformer, 7-Year-Old Cannot Be Guilty Of Contributory Negligence: Allahabad High Court POCSO Conviction Can't Stand For Offence Not Charged: Delhi High Court Member of Unlawful Assembly Cannot Escape Conviction By Claiming He Only Carried a Lathi and Struck No One: Allahabad High Court Jurisdiction Cannot Be Founded On Casual Or Incidental Facts If Not Have A Direct Nexus With The Lis: : Delhi High Court Clause Stating Disputes "Can" Be Settled By Arbitration Is Not A Binding Arbitration Agreement: Supreme Court State Cannot Plead Helplessness Against Sand Mafia; Supreme Court Warns Of Paramilitary Deployment, Complete Mining Ban In MP & Rajasthan Authority Cannot Withdraw Subsidy Citing Non-Compliance When It Ignored Repeated Requests For Inspection: Supreme Court Out-of-State SC/ST/OBC Candidates Cannot Claim Rajasthan's Reservation Benefits in NEET PG Counselling: Rajasthan High Court Supreme Court Upholds Haryana's Regularisation Of Qualified Ad Hoc Staff As 'One-Time Measure', Strikes Down Futuristic Cut-Offs

Supreme Court Grants Interim Bail to Appellant for Accounts Finalization"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment by the Supreme Court of India, the Bench of Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aniruddha Bose and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Bela M. Trivedi granted interim bail to the appellant, Bimal Ramgopal Agarwal, for the purpose of finalizing accounts under the Companies Act and the Income Tax Act. The judgment, delivered on September 27, 2023, addressed the unique circumstances of the case where the appellant was incarcerated in Sabarmati Central Correctional Home in Ahmedabad and needed to travel to Mumbai for this specific purpose.

The Court observed, "In such circumstances, we grant him interim bail for three days, upon setting aside the impugned order, with the following conditions..." [Para 6(i)-(iv)]. The conditions stipulated that the appellant would be released on interim bail for three days, subject to terms determined by the Trial Court. During this period, he would be escorted by a team of Officers of the Central Bureau of Investigation (C.B.I.) at his own cost, who would accompany him to Mumbai and any place he visited there for the purpose of preparing returns/reports under the aforementioned statutes. Additionally, the appellant was required to make proper arrangements for the accommodation of the CBI team in Mumbai and return to the correctional home after three days.

The judgment not only granted interim bail but also set aside the impugned order and provided a clear framework for the appellant's temporary release. It emphasized the importance of addressing the specific needs of the case while ensuring the proper administration of justice.

This decision highlights the Supreme Court's commitment to delivering justice even in exceptional circumstances, demonstrating the Court's nuanced approach to balancing personal liberty and legal requirements.

Date of Decision: September 27, 2023

BIMAL RAMGOPAL AGARWAL vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.     

Latest Legal News