Section 498A IPC | Asking Daughter-In-Law To Do Household Chores Like Washing Clothes & Utensils Does Not Amount To 'Cruelty': Bombay High Court Section 306 IPC | Instigation Can Be Inferred From Continued Harassment, Absence Of Suicide Note No Ground For Discharge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Section 20 Prevention Of Corruption Act | Statutory Presumption Cannot Be Triggered Without Proof Of Demand; Mere Recovery Insufficient: Himachal Pradesh High Court Gift Of Temple Inam Land Void Ab Initio, Incapable Of Government Sanction Or Valid Registration: Supreme Court Section 483 BNSS | Pursuing Parallel Remedies & Suppressing Rejection Of Interim Relief Amounts To Abuse Of Process; Uberrima Fides Essential For Bail: Supreme Court Suit For Possession Simpliciter Not Maintainable When Registered Sale Deed Casts Serious Cloud On Title; Declaration Or Cancellation Mandatory: Supreme Court Representation Of People Act | Private Complaint By Voter Maintainable For False Nomination Affidavit, Section 195 CrPC Bar Inapplicable: Supreme Court Gravity Of Allegations Cannot Eclipse Other Bail Considerations Or Justify Indefinite Pre-Trial Detention: Supreme Court Contract Act | Agreement To Sell Not Enforceable Contract Prior To Conveyance Deed; State Can Re-Auction For Price Maximisation: Supreme Court Failure To Consider Incident Video Footage & Section 161 CrPC Witness Statements Vitiates Grant Of Bail: Supreme Court Section 125 CrPC | Adverse Finding Of Adultery Cannot Be Recorded Against Specifically Named Co-Adulterer Without Giving Opportunity Of Hearing: Allahabad High Court Order 6 Rule 17 CPC | Amendment Of Pleadings To Correct Typographical Errors Should Be Allowed To Ensure True Facts Are Before Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Major Penalty Of Removal From Service Cannot Be Imposed Without Departmental Inquiry: Bombay High Court Quashes Order Under General Insurance Rules Section 482 CrPC | High Court Cannot Quash FIR When Allegations Of Forgery And Fraud Raise Disputed Questions Of Fact: Delhi High Court Criminal Proceedings Cannot Be Quashed In Entirety Merely Because Section 498A IPC Is Not Sustainable Due To Invalid Marriage: Calcutta High Court Section 138 NI Act | Arraigning Company As Accused Imperative To Prosecute Managing Director Or Signatory: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 14(6) DRC Act | 5-Year Bar On Eviction Inapplicable When Co-Owners Acquire Premises Inter Se Family Through Gift Deed: Delhi High Court Territorial Jurisdiction In Missing Person Cases | Court Can Direct CBI Probe If Journey Commenced Within Its Jurisdiction: Kerala High Court Future Prospects Must Be Added In Permanent Disability Cases Even If Functional Disability Is Assessed Liberally: Punjab & Haryana High Court Registration Act | Registering Authority Lacks Power To Refuse Registration On Grounds Of Unapproved Layout Or Lack Of Title: Telangana High Court

Supreme Court Grants Bail in NDPS: Delays in Trial and Absence of Prior Criminal Record Weigh in Favor

07 May 2024 2:49 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court of India, in a significant ruling today, granted bail to Naeem Ahmed alias Naim Ahmad, involved in a narcotics case, emphasizing the need for justice amidst procedural delays.

Legal Point of the Judgment: The apex court’s decision pivots around the consideration of regular bail, as opposed to default bail, which was the initial contention. The Court delved into the specifics of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, particularly focusing on Sections 21, 29, 61, and 85, along with the critical aspect of ‘conscious possession’ of contraband.

Facts and Issues: The appellant, Naeem Ahmed, was implicated in FIR No. 152/2022 for allegedly possessing 340 grams of smack (morphine). His request for default bail was earlier rejected by the Delhi High Court due to an incomplete charge-sheet lacking a crucial FSL/Chemical examiner report. The Supreme Court was approached subsequent to this rejection.

Court’s Assessment: The Court, led by Justices Surya Kant and K.V. Viswanathan, meticulously analyzed the circumstances. It was observed that Ahmed had been in custody for over a year and eleven months, with the trial still pending. The Court noted, “It is a seriously debatable question of fact whether the appellant was also found in the conscious possession of the contraband(smack).” This observation paved the way for considering regular bail, as the twin test of Section 37 of the NDPS Act was deemed not applicable at this stage.

Decision: The Court, without commenting on the merits of the case, granted bail to Ahmed, taking into account the prolonged period of custody and the delay in framing charges. The bail was conditioned on Ahmed furnishing bail bonds, reporting bi-monthly to the local police station, and depositing his passport. The Court cautioned that involvement in any other case could lead to the cancellation of this bail.

Date of Decision: February 28, 2024.

Naeem Ahmed alias Naim Ahmad vs. Govt of NCT of Delhi,

Latest Legal News