CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness Employee Cannot Switch Cadre At His Sweet Will After Accepting Promotion: J&K High Court Rejects Claim For Retrospective Assistant Registrar Appointment Anticipatory Bail Cannot Expire With Charge-Sheet: Supreme Court Reiterates Liberty Is Not Bound by Procedural Milestones Order II Rule 2 Cannot Eclipse Amendment Power Under Order VI Rule 17: MP High Court Refuses to Stall Will-Based Title Suit Grounds of Arrest Must Be Personal, Not Formal – But Detailed Allegations Suffice: Kerala High Court Upholds Arrest in Sabarimala Gold Misappropriation Case Grounds of Arrest Are Not a Ritual – They Are a Constitutional Mandate Under Article 22(1): Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Arrest for Non-Supply of Written Grounds Sect. 25 NDPS | Mere Ownership Cannot Fasten NDPS Liability – ‘Knowingly Permits’ Must Be Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt: MP High Court Section 308 CrPC | Revocation of Pardon Is Not Automatic on Prosecutor’s Certificate: Karnataka High Court Joint Family and Ancestral Property Are Alien to Mohammedan Law: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Injunction Right to Health Cannot Wait for Endless Consultations: Supreme Court Pulls Up FSSAI Over Delay in Front-of-Pack Warning Labels If A Son Dies Intestate Leaving Wife And Children, The Mother Has No Share: Karnataka High Court

Supreme Court Grants Bail in NDPS: Delays in Trial and Absence of Prior Criminal Record Weigh in Favor

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court of India, in a significant ruling today, granted bail to Naeem Ahmed alias Naim Ahmad, involved in a narcotics case, emphasizing the need for justice amidst procedural delays.

Legal Point of the Judgment: The apex court’s decision pivots around the consideration of regular bail, as opposed to default bail, which was the initial contention. The Court delved into the specifics of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, particularly focusing on Sections 21, 29, 61, and 85, along with the critical aspect of ‘conscious possession’ of contraband.

Facts and Issues: The appellant, Naeem Ahmed, was implicated in FIR No. 152/2022 for allegedly possessing 340 grams of smack (morphine). His request for default bail was earlier rejected by the Delhi High Court due to an incomplete charge-sheet lacking a crucial FSL/Chemical examiner report. The Supreme Court was approached subsequent to this rejection.

Court’s Assessment: The Court, led by Justices Surya Kant and K.V. Viswanathan, meticulously analyzed the circumstances. It was observed that Ahmed had been in custody for over a year and eleven months, with the trial still pending. The Court noted, “It is a seriously debatable question of fact whether the appellant was also found in the conscious possession of the contraband(smack).” This observation paved the way for considering regular bail, as the twin test of Section 37 of the NDPS Act was deemed not applicable at this stage.

Decision: The Court, without commenting on the merits of the case, granted bail to Ahmed, taking into account the prolonged period of custody and the delay in framing charges. The bail was conditioned on Ahmed furnishing bail bonds, reporting bi-monthly to the local police station, and depositing his passport. The Court cautioned that involvement in any other case could lead to the cancellation of this bail.

Date of Decision: February 28, 2024.

Naeem Ahmed alias Naim Ahmad vs. Govt of NCT of Delhi,

Latest Legal News