Bail Applicant Under Mandatory Obligation To Disclose Criminal Antecedents, Non-Disclosure Results In Erroneous Decisions: Andhra Pradesh High Court Judicial Decrees Cannot Be Set Aside By Administrative Orders After Decades; Long-Standing Revenue Entries Must Be Protected: Allahabad High Court 'Any Use Whatsoever' Includes Promotion & Events: Bombay High Court Restrains New Indian Express Group From Hosting Commercial Events Outside Southern States Reserved Category Candidates Who Qualify On Their Own Seniority Must Be Adjusted Against Unreserved Vacancies: Calcutta High Court Decree For Possession Can Be Passed If Landlord-Tenant Relationship & Termination Are Admitted; Unregistered Lease Is Month-To-Month: Delhi High Court Prosecution Against Co-Accused Not Sustainable When Main Accused Is Discharged On Same Facts: Jharkhand High Court Admission Of Handwriting On Account Statement Is Not Admission Of Its Contents; Corroborative Evidence Necessary To Prove Claim: Gujarat High Court Omission Of Label Defects In Food Inspector's Spot Memo Fatal To Prosecution For Misbranding: Himachal Pradesh High Court RBI Must Consult State Government, Not Just Registrar, To Supersede Co-operative Bank Board; Principles Of Natural Justice Excluded Under Section 36AAA: Kerala High Court Suit Filed Before IBC Proceedings Cannot Be Dismissed Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC; Section 96 Moratorium Only Stays Pending Actions: Calcutta High Court Senior Citizens Not Technologically Savvy Cannot Be Penalized For Not Checking Case Status On Court Website: Tripura High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Case Against CM Revanth Reddy Over 2019 Election Roadshow, Cites Bar Under Section 195 CrPC Maintenance Tribunal Orders Passed Without Mandated Three-Member Coram Are A Nullity: Punjab & Haryana High Court School Register Entry Regarding Date Of Birth Lacks Probative Value Unless Source Of Information Is Proved: Madhya Pradesh High Court Sets Aside POCSO Conviction Limitation Period For Specific Performance Starts From Date Of Refusal If No Fixed Date Stipulated In Agreement: Karnataka High Court Pensionary Benefits Not ‘Pecuniary Advantage’, Cannot Be Deducted From Income For Motor Accident Compensation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Will | Disinheriting Caring Spouse In Favour Of Non-Relatives Is An ‘Unnatural Disposition’ Raising Grave Suspicion: Supreme Court Registration Does Not Automatically Validate Will If Process Is Shrouded In Suspicion; Testator's Illiteracy Increases Burden On Propounder: Supreme Court Propounder Faces Heavy Burden Of Proof When Testator Is Illiterate; Registration Does Not Cure Unexplained Suspicious Circumstances: Supreme Court

Supreme Court Grants Bail in NDPS: Delays in Trial and Absence of Prior Criminal Record Weigh in Favor

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court of India, in a significant ruling today, granted bail to Naeem Ahmed alias Naim Ahmad, involved in a narcotics case, emphasizing the need for justice amidst procedural delays.

Legal Point of the Judgment: The apex court’s decision pivots around the consideration of regular bail, as opposed to default bail, which was the initial contention. The Court delved into the specifics of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, particularly focusing on Sections 21, 29, 61, and 85, along with the critical aspect of ‘conscious possession’ of contraband.

Facts and Issues: The appellant, Naeem Ahmed, was implicated in FIR No. 152/2022 for allegedly possessing 340 grams of smack (morphine). His request for default bail was earlier rejected by the Delhi High Court due to an incomplete charge-sheet lacking a crucial FSL/Chemical examiner report. The Supreme Court was approached subsequent to this rejection.

Court’s Assessment: The Court, led by Justices Surya Kant and K.V. Viswanathan, meticulously analyzed the circumstances. It was observed that Ahmed had been in custody for over a year and eleven months, with the trial still pending. The Court noted, “It is a seriously debatable question of fact whether the appellant was also found in the conscious possession of the contraband(smack).” This observation paved the way for considering regular bail, as the twin test of Section 37 of the NDPS Act was deemed not applicable at this stage.

Decision: The Court, without commenting on the merits of the case, granted bail to Ahmed, taking into account the prolonged period of custody and the delay in framing charges. The bail was conditioned on Ahmed furnishing bail bonds, reporting bi-monthly to the local police station, and depositing his passport. The Court cautioned that involvement in any other case could lead to the cancellation of this bail.

Date of Decision: February 28, 2024.

Naeem Ahmed alias Naim Ahmad vs. Govt of NCT of Delhi,

Latest Legal News