Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court Illicit Affair Alone Cannot Make a Man Guilty of Abetting Suicide: Supreme Court Quashes Charge Under Section 306 IPC Landlord Cannot Be Punished for Slowness of Courts: Supreme Court on Bonafide Need in Eviction Suits Expect States To Enact Laws Regulating Unlicensed Money Lenders Charging Exorbitant Interest Contrary To 'Damdupat': Supreme Court Accused Who Skips Lok Adalat After Seeking It, Then Cries 'Prejudice', Cannot Claim Apprehension of Denial of Justice: Madras High Court Refuse To Transfer Case IO Cannot Act Without Prior Sanction: Gujarat High Court Grants Bail, Flags Procedural Lapse in Religious Conversion Case Electricity Board Strictly Liable For Unprotected Transformer, 7-Year-Old Cannot Be Guilty Of Contributory Negligence: Allahabad High Court POCSO Conviction Can't Stand For Offence Not Charged: Delhi High Court Member of Unlawful Assembly Cannot Escape Conviction By Claiming He Only Carried a Lathi and Struck No One: Allahabad High Court Jurisdiction Cannot Be Founded On Casual Or Incidental Facts If Not Have A Direct Nexus With The Lis: : Delhi High Court Clause Stating Disputes "Can" Be Settled By Arbitration Is Not A Binding Arbitration Agreement: Supreme Court State Cannot Plead Helplessness Against Sand Mafia; Supreme Court Warns Of Paramilitary Deployment, Complete Mining Ban In MP & Rajasthan Authority Cannot Withdraw Subsidy Citing Non-Compliance When It Ignored Repeated Requests For Inspection: Supreme Court Out-of-State SC/ST/OBC Candidates Cannot Claim Rajasthan's Reservation Benefits in NEET PG Counselling: Rajasthan High Court Supreme Court Upholds Haryana's Regularisation Of Qualified Ad Hoc Staff As 'One-Time Measure', Strikes Down Futuristic Cut-Offs

Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail in Promise-to-Marry Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent verdict, the Supreme Court of India has granted anticipatory bail to Anjani Kumar Pathak, also known as Anjani Kumar, in a case involving allegations of a promise to marry and subsequent breach. The FIR was filed under various sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (POA) Act, 1989.

The judgment highlighted the significance of personal liberty in the context of granting bail, with the Court stating, "Importance of personal liberty in the context of applying discretion to grant bail - Emphasis on granting bail ordinarily, with caution in serious cases involving offences carrying long sentences or special offences."

The appellant had initially been denied anticipatory bail by the High Court but was granted interim protection by the Supreme Court. Subsequently, a chargesheet was filed against the appellant in April 2023. The Supreme Court, taking into consideration the overall circumstances of the case, disposed of the appeal with the direction that a case for regular bail is indeed made out.

The judgment further stated, "The appellant shall apply for regular bail before the Court concerned, for which the appellant shall surrender within a period of six weeks. Till such bail application is moved, the interim protection already granted by this Court... shall continue."

This decision underscores the importance of personal liberty and the cautious approach in bail matters, especially in cases involving serious allegations. The judgment sets a precedent for similar cases in the future, emphasizing the need to balance the interests of justice with individual liberties.

Date of Decision: 26 September 2023

ANJANI KUMAR PATHAK @ ANJANI KUMAR vs THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR.  

Latest Legal News