Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Sudden Quarrel over Mound of Earth — Not Murder but Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court Eligibility Flows from Birth, Not a Certificate Date: Delhi High Court Strikes Down Rule Fixing Arbitrary Cut-Off for OBC-NCL Certificates in CAPF (AC) Recruitment Bar Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Invoked Where Specific Performance Was Legally Premature Due To Statutory Impediments: P&H High Court Once a Court Declares a Department an Industry Under Section 2(j), State Cannot Raise the Same Objection Again: Gujarat High Court Slams Repetitive Litigation by Irrigation Department “How Could Cheques Issued in 2020 Be Mentioned in a 2019 Contract?”: Delhi High Court Grants Injunction in Forged MOA Case, Slams Prima Facie Fabrication Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC Sole Testimony of Prosecutrix, If Credible, Is Enough to Convict: Delhi High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Cheque Issued as Security Still Attracts Section 138 NI Act If Liability Exists on Date of Presentation: Himachal Pradesh High Court No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity

Supreme Court Empowers Magistrates to Take Suo Motu Action to Prevent Child Marriages

20 October 2024 2:14 PM

By: Deepak Kumar


Magistrates must proactively issue preventive injunctions to halt child marriages, especially during mass wedding ceremonies. In a landmark judgment on October 18, 2024, the Supreme Court of India empowered magistrates to take suo motu action to prevent child marriages under the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act (PCMA), 2006. This ruling was part of a comprehensive set of guidelines issued in the case of Society for Enlightenment and Voluntary Action & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors., where the Court addressed the urgent need to strengthen enforcement mechanisms against child marriages across the country.

"Magistrates should not wait for complaints; they are empowered to act on credible information or even suspicion to stop child marriages."

The Supreme Court directed all magistrates vested with authority under Section 13 of the PCMA to take proactive steps to prevent the solemnization of child marriages, including issuing suo motu injunctions when necessary. The Court emphasized that magistrates should focus particularly on "auspicious days," known for mass weddings, when the risk of child marriages is highest.

The suo motu empowerment allows magistrates to act independently, even without a formal complaint, to prevent imminent child marriages. This proactive approach aims to close the enforcement gap, ensuring that judicial authorities can intervene before the marriage takes place, rather than only addressing the issue after the fact.

The Court highlighted that child marriages often occur during public or mass wedding ceremonies, making it difficult for authorities to intervene in real-time. By granting magistrates the power to issue preventive injunctions, the Court aims to ensure immediate action is taken to stop such ceremonies from proceeding. This directive reinforces the role of the judiciary in preventing harm before it occurs, aligning with the Court's broader objective of shifting focus from penalizing to preventing child marriages.

"Magistrates must be particularly vigilant during mass weddings, using their judicial powers to issue preventive orders and protect children's rights."

The Supreme Court’s ruling empowering magistrates to take suo motu action is a major step towards ensuring stricter enforcement of child marriage laws in India. This proactive judicial measure is designed to prevent marriages before they occur, reinforcing the legal protection for children and furthering the country’s commitment to ending child marriage.

 

Date of Decision:October 18, 2024.

Society for Enlightenment and Voluntary Action & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.

Latest Legal News