Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Supreme Court Distinguishes Between Murder and Culpable Homicide in Telangana Case, Alters Conviction of One Accused

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In the case of Velthepu Srinivas and Others v. State of Andhra Pradesh (now State of Telangana) and Anr., the Supreme Court of India has delivered a nuanced judgment distinguishing between murder and culpable homicide. The Court upheld the life imprisonment sentences of three appellants under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC for murder, while modifying the conviction of the fourth appellant (A-3) to Section 304 Part II IPC for culpable homicide, sentencing him to 10 years imprisonment.

The genesis of the case lies in a political rivalry in Janda Venkatpur, Telangana, leading to a fatal attack on the deceased by four accused belonging to a rival family. The incident, involving the use of an axe, sword, stone, and knife, was reported by the son of the deceased, who was an eyewitness.

In its detailed assessment, the Court scrutinized the eyewitness testimonies and physical evidence. A pivotal observation was the differing roles and intentions of the accused in the attack. While A-1, A-2, and A-4 were found to have actively participated in the murder using lethal weapons, A-3’s involvement was deemed less severe, as he only used a stone and lacked the intention to commit murder.

The judgment delineated the legal principles concerning Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC, relating to murder and common intention, contrasting them with Section 304 Part II IPC, which covers culpable homicide not amounting to murder. The Court’s decision to modify A-3’s conviction was based on the absence of a shared intention to commit murder and his lesser degree of participation in the crime.

Ultimately, the Supreme Court’s decision upheld the life sentences for A-1, A-2, and A-4 for murder, while reducing A-3’s sentence to 10 years for culpable homicide. This judgment is significant for its detailed analysis of the individual roles and intentions of the accused in a murder case.

Date of Decision: February 06, 2024

Velthepu Srinivas and Others v. State of Andhra Pradesh (now State of Telangana) and Anr.

 

Latest Legal News