Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

Supreme Court Distinguishes Between Murder and Culpable Homicide in Telangana Case, Alters Conviction of One Accused

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In the case of Velthepu Srinivas and Others v. State of Andhra Pradesh (now State of Telangana) and Anr., the Supreme Court of India has delivered a nuanced judgment distinguishing between murder and culpable homicide. The Court upheld the life imprisonment sentences of three appellants under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC for murder, while modifying the conviction of the fourth appellant (A-3) to Section 304 Part II IPC for culpable homicide, sentencing him to 10 years imprisonment.

The genesis of the case lies in a political rivalry in Janda Venkatpur, Telangana, leading to a fatal attack on the deceased by four accused belonging to a rival family. The incident, involving the use of an axe, sword, stone, and knife, was reported by the son of the deceased, who was an eyewitness.

In its detailed assessment, the Court scrutinized the eyewitness testimonies and physical evidence. A pivotal observation was the differing roles and intentions of the accused in the attack. While A-1, A-2, and A-4 were found to have actively participated in the murder using lethal weapons, A-3’s involvement was deemed less severe, as he only used a stone and lacked the intention to commit murder.

The judgment delineated the legal principles concerning Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC, relating to murder and common intention, contrasting them with Section 304 Part II IPC, which covers culpable homicide not amounting to murder. The Court’s decision to modify A-3’s conviction was based on the absence of a shared intention to commit murder and his lesser degree of participation in the crime.

Ultimately, the Supreme Court’s decision upheld the life sentences for A-1, A-2, and A-4 for murder, while reducing A-3’s sentence to 10 years for culpable homicide. This judgment is significant for its detailed analysis of the individual roles and intentions of the accused in a murder case.

Date of Decision: February 06, 2024

Velthepu Srinivas and Others v. State of Andhra Pradesh (now State of Telangana) and Anr.

 

Latest Legal News