Conviction Under Section 409 IPC Postulates Strict Proof Of Entrustment; Suspicion However Grave Cannot Substitute Proof: Supreme Court Criminal Prosecution Emanating From Past Matrimonial Relationship Ought Not To Linger After Divorce: Supreme Court Negligence Of Previous Counsel Not A Ground To Reopen Concluded Pre-Charge Evidence Under Section 311 CrPC: Allahabad High Court Unregistered Agreement To Sell Cannot Protect Tenant's Possession Under Section 53A Transfer Of Property Act: Delhi High Court Certified Copies Of Registered Sale Deeds Admissible As Secondary Evidence Without Proving Loss Of Original: Gauhati High Court Counsel Representing Deceased Party Must Inform Court Of Death Under Order XXII Rule 10-A CPC: J&K High Court Son Staying In Father's House Out Of Love And Affection Is A Mere Licensee, Cannot Challenge Father's Title: Delhi High Court Conviction For Murder Cannot Stand Where Single Blow Inflicted In Sudden Fight Without Premeditation: Uttarakhand High Court Inability To Trace Suppliers Or Buyers No Ground For Custodial Interrogation Once Recovery Is Effected: Punjab & Haryana High Court Right To Assemble Peacefully To Celebrate Association Anniversary Is A Fundamental Right; Unlawful Assembly Per Se Not An Offence: Madras High Court Marriage Photographs Can Be Relied Upon To Estimate Quantity Of Gold Ornaments In Matrimonial Disputes: Kerala High Court POCSO Act Not Confined To Securing Convictions, Soul Of Law Lies In Preserving Childhood Dignity & Healing: Madras High Court Special Appeal Maintainable If Single Judge's Order Relates To Authority Acting Without Statutory Appellate Jurisdiction: Allahabad High Court Recall Of Witness For Cross-Examination Permissible On Newly Framed Issue Post-Remand Even If Disposal Timeline Is Fixed: Karnataka High Court Litigant Cannot Overcome Law Of Limitation By Shifting Blame On Counsel Through Inconsistent Stands: Madras High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Preventive Detention Not Warranted If Person Can Be Dealt With Under Ordinary Laws; No Effort To Arrest In Pending Cases: Supreme Court Accused Languishing In Jail For 9 Years Deserves Bail; Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Violated: Supreme Court Custodial Death | Pendency Of Criminal Trial No Bar For Awarding Compensation Under Public Law Remedy: Gauhati High Court Suit For Possession Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act Barred If Filed Beyond Six Months Of Dispossession: Madras High Court Subsequent Purchaser Is Representative Of Judgment Debtor, Separate Suit Challenging Execution Sale Barred Under Section 47 CPC: Kerala High Court Statutory Bail Restrictions Melt Down When Pre-Trial Detention Is Prolonged & Trial Is Unlikely To Conclude Soon: Delhi High Court Failure To Apprise Accused Of Right Under Section 50 NDPS Act Vitiates Search & Recovery: J&K & Ladakh High Court Section 12(5) Arbitration Act Inapplicable To Proceedings Commenced Before 2015 Amendment; Executing Court Can't Apply Neutrality Norms Retrospectively: Punjab & Haryana High Court Banks Can Share Sale Proceeds Of Secured Assets Outside Liquidation Estate With Homebuyers Under Compromise Agreement: Kerala High Court Election Disputes Must Be Resolved Expeditiously; Long Stays Render Adjudication A Mockery Of Justice: Madras High Court Delhi High Court Suspends LOC, Permits Businessman To Travel Abroad For Healthcare Conferences; Cites Roots In Society & Past Compliance Section 138 NI Act Complaint Not Maintainable By Third Party Who Is Neither Payee Nor Holder In Due Course: Allahabad High Court

Supreme Court Dissolves Marriage on Grounds of ‘Irretrievable Breakdown’, Long Separation and Non-Response to Summons”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has dissolved a marriage citing the grounds of ‘irretrievable breakdown’. This decision in the case of Xxx VS Xxx   (2024 INSC 55) marks a pivotal moment in the interpretation of matrimonial laws in India.

The bench, comprising Justices B.R. Gavai and Prashant Kumar Mishra, emphasized the long separation of almost 13 years between the parties, during which there was no communication, as a key factor in their decision. “We have no hesitation in holding that the present is a case of irretrievable breakdown of marriage as there is no possibility of the couple staying together,” the bench observed (Para 15).

The case came to the Supreme Court after both the Family Court and the High Court dismissed the appellant’s plea for divorce on the grounds of cruelty and desertion. In an unusual turn, the Supreme Court chose to focus on the ‘irretrievable breakdown’ of the marriage, noting that the respondent-wife had consistently failed to appear in various judicial proceedings, which was seen as an indication of her lack of interest in continuing the marital relationship.

Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra, delivering the judgment, stated, “The respondent-wife is not even responding to the summons issued by the courts. It seems she is no longer interested in continuing the marital relations with the appellant” (Para 15). This non-appearance was a significant consideration in the Court’s decision to dissolve the marriage.

The Court exercised its power under Article 142(1) of the Constitution of India, a provision that allows it to pass any order necessary for doing ‘complete justice’ in any cause or matter pending before it. This remarkable use of Article 142 underscores the Supreme Court’s commitment to ensuring justice in complex matrimonial disputes.

The dissolution of the marriage between Prakashchandra Joshi and Kuntal Prakashchandra Joshi, solemnized on 5th January 2004, was thus granted, bringing an end to a long-standing matrimonial discord. This judgment is expected to have significant implications for future cases involving prolonged separation and non-cooperation from one of the spouses.

Date of Decision: 24 January 2024

Xxx VS Xxx                 

 

Latest Legal News