Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Supreme Court Bars Post-Divorce Maintenance Claims When Wife Voluntarily Waived Maintenance In Settlement Agreement Advocate Is An Officer Of Court, Not Mere Agent Of Client: Allahabad High Court Distinguishes Between Active Concealment & Statement In Ignorance, Slaps Cost On Litigants For Misleading Bench Cannot Summon Accused Mechanically On Protest Petition Without Assigning Justifiable Reasons: Andhra Pradesh High Court Increment Not A Bounty: Allahabad High Court Rules Public Holiday Cannot Delay Pay Hike For Teachers Joining Next Working Day Paying Taxes Or Utility Connections Confer No Legal Ownership Over Govt Land': Andhra Pradesh High Court Orders Demolition Of Encroachment 'Cannot Compel Public Authority To Collect Data From Private Bodies': Bombay High Court Quashes CIC Orders Directing SEBI To Procure BSE Records Under RTI Act Section 10 CPC Cannot Stay Previously Instituted Title Suit Pending Subsequent Probate Case; Inherent Powers Under Section 151 Inapplicable When Probate Dismissed: Calcutta High Court Mere Phone Calls Without Transcripts No Ground For Murder Conspiracy: Delhi High Court Clear Violation Of Section 42 NDPS Act': Gujarat High Court Holds Failure To Record Secret Info In Writing Fatal When Police Officer Had Time To Act JK High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Cop Accused Of Threatening Advocate Over Phone Call Without Prior Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC Custody Unwarranted For Mere Formalities Once Weapon Is Recovered: Kerala High Court Grants Regular Bail In BNS Axe Attack Case Circumstances Of Crime Can Be Assessed During Trial: High Court Upholds Trial Of Minor As Adult Under JJ Act In Murder Case Statutory Deposit Under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC Is A Sine Qua Non; Litigant Cannot Stall Auction Sale By Merely Blaming Counsel: Madras High Court Ban Junk Food Within 50 Metres Of Schools: Rajasthan High Court Takes Suo Moto Cognizance To Enforce FSSAI Norms, Protect Children From Obesity

Supreme Court Dissolves Marriage on Grounds of ‘Irretrievable Breakdown’, Long Separation and Non-Response to Summons”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has dissolved a marriage citing the grounds of ‘irretrievable breakdown’. This decision in the case of Xxx VS Xxx   (2024 INSC 55) marks a pivotal moment in the interpretation of matrimonial laws in India.

The bench, comprising Justices B.R. Gavai and Prashant Kumar Mishra, emphasized the long separation of almost 13 years between the parties, during which there was no communication, as a key factor in their decision. “We have no hesitation in holding that the present is a case of irretrievable breakdown of marriage as there is no possibility of the couple staying together,” the bench observed (Para 15).

The case came to the Supreme Court after both the Family Court and the High Court dismissed the appellant’s plea for divorce on the grounds of cruelty and desertion. In an unusual turn, the Supreme Court chose to focus on the ‘irretrievable breakdown’ of the marriage, noting that the respondent-wife had consistently failed to appear in various judicial proceedings, which was seen as an indication of her lack of interest in continuing the marital relationship.

Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra, delivering the judgment, stated, “The respondent-wife is not even responding to the summons issued by the courts. It seems she is no longer interested in continuing the marital relations with the appellant” (Para 15). This non-appearance was a significant consideration in the Court’s decision to dissolve the marriage.

The Court exercised its power under Article 142(1) of the Constitution of India, a provision that allows it to pass any order necessary for doing ‘complete justice’ in any cause or matter pending before it. This remarkable use of Article 142 underscores the Supreme Court’s commitment to ensuring justice in complex matrimonial disputes.

The dissolution of the marriage between Prakashchandra Joshi and Kuntal Prakashchandra Joshi, solemnized on 5th January 2004, was thus granted, bringing an end to a long-standing matrimonial discord. This judgment is expected to have significant implications for future cases involving prolonged separation and non-cooperation from one of the spouses.

Date of Decision: 24 January 2024

Xxx VS Xxx                 

 

Latest Legal News