Procedural Lapses and Prolonged Incarceration Justify Bail Under NDPS Act: Bombay High Court Mere Non-Deposit of Sale Balance Is Not Fatal to Specific Performance Claims: Andhra High Court Justice Requires Insurance Company to Pay and Recover: Calcutta High Court on Fatal Accident Case IBC Moratorium Nullifies Vicarious Liability Under Section 138 of NI Act: Delhi High Court Fraud Unravels All: Partition Decree Set Aside for Suppressing Rights of Co-Owners: Madras High Court Matters of Evidence Must Be Examined at Trial, Not Preemptively Quashed: Kerala High Court Declines Quashment Leave Encashment Is a Property Right and Cannot Be Denied Without Statutory Authority: Gujarat High Court Widow's Right to Deceased Husband’s Property Ceases Upon Remarriage Before 1956: Himachal Pradesh High Court No Reassessment of Departmental Inquiries by Courts, Orders Interest on Delayed GPF Payments: P&H High Court Investigations Initiated Before BNSS, 2023, Must Proceed Under Cr.P.C., 1973: Rajasthan High Court Third-Party Objector’s Locus Standi in Criminal Cases Must Have a Bona Fide Connection: Madhya Pradesh High Court Amendments After Trial Commences Barred Without Demonstration of Due Diligence - Contradictory Claims Cannot Be Permitted: Punjab & Haryana High Court Double Presumption of Innocence in Appeals Against Acquittals Must Be Respected: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Acquittal in Rape and Carnal Intercourse Case Provisional Release Not Prejudice Revenue Interests: Kerala High Court Permits Provisional Release of Seized Goods Under GST Act GST Registration Cannot Be Cancelled Retrospectively Without Objective Criteria:  Delhi High Court Neither the Statutory Framework nor Lease Terms Compel Conveyance of Property: Supreme Court Owner Can Avoid Confiscation Under NDPS by Proving Lack of Knowledge or Connivance in Illicit Use of Vehicle: Supreme Court Court is Expert of Experts: High Court Upholds Right to Rebuttal Evidence in Will Dispute Exceptional Circumstances Warrant Use of Inherent Powers to Reduce Sentences in Non-Compoundable Offenses: Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dissolves Marriage on Grounds of ‘Irretrievable Breakdown’, Long Separation and Non-Response to Summons”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India has dissolved a marriage citing the grounds of ‘irretrievable breakdown’. This decision in the case of Xxx VS Xxx   (2024 INSC 55) marks a pivotal moment in the interpretation of matrimonial laws in India.

The bench, comprising Justices B.R. Gavai and Prashant Kumar Mishra, emphasized the long separation of almost 13 years between the parties, during which there was no communication, as a key factor in their decision. “We have no hesitation in holding that the present is a case of irretrievable breakdown of marriage as there is no possibility of the couple staying together,” the bench observed (Para 15).

The case came to the Supreme Court after both the Family Court and the High Court dismissed the appellant’s plea for divorce on the grounds of cruelty and desertion. In an unusual turn, the Supreme Court chose to focus on the ‘irretrievable breakdown’ of the marriage, noting that the respondent-wife had consistently failed to appear in various judicial proceedings, which was seen as an indication of her lack of interest in continuing the marital relationship.

Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra, delivering the judgment, stated, “The respondent-wife is not even responding to the summons issued by the courts. It seems she is no longer interested in continuing the marital relations with the appellant” (Para 15). This non-appearance was a significant consideration in the Court’s decision to dissolve the marriage.

The Court exercised its power under Article 142(1) of the Constitution of India, a provision that allows it to pass any order necessary for doing ‘complete justice’ in any cause or matter pending before it. This remarkable use of Article 142 underscores the Supreme Court’s commitment to ensuring justice in complex matrimonial disputes.

The dissolution of the marriage between Prakashchandra Joshi and Kuntal Prakashchandra Joshi, solemnized on 5th January 2004, was thus granted, bringing an end to a long-standing matrimonial discord. This judgment is expected to have significant implications for future cases involving prolonged separation and non-cooperation from one of the spouses.

Date of Decision: 24 January 2024

Xxx VS Xxx                 

 

Similar News