"Party Autonomy is the Backbone of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Upholds Sole Arbitrator Appointment Despite Party’s Attempts to Frustrate Arbitration Proceedings    |     Reasonable Doubt Arising from Sole Testimony in Absence of Corroboration, Power Cut Compounded Identification Difficulties: Supreme Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case    |     ED Can Investigate Without FIRs: PH High Court Affirms PMLA’s Broad Powers    |     Accident Claim | Contributory Negligence Cannot Be Vicariously Attributed to Passengers: Supreme Court    |     Default Bail | Indefeasible Right to Bail Prevails: Allahabad High Court Faults Special Judge for Delayed Extension of Investigation    |     “Habitual Offenders Cannot Satisfy Bail Conditions Under NDPS Act”: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail to Accused with Extensive Criminal Record    |     Delhi High Court Denies Substitution for Son Due to 'Gross Unexplained Delay' of Over Six Years in Trademark Suit    |     Section 4B of the Tenancy Act Cannot Override Land Exemptions for Public Development: Bombay High Court    |     Suspicion, However High, Is Not a Substitute for Proof: Calcutta High Court Orders Reinstatement of Coast Guard Officer Dismissed on Suspicion of Forgery    |     Age Not Conclusively Proven, Prosecutrix Found to be a Consenting Party: Chhattisgarh High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case    |     'Company's Absence in Prosecution Renders Case Void': Himachal High Court Quashes Complaint Against Pharma Directors    |     Preventive Detention Cannot Sacrifice Personal Liberty on Mere Allegations: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention of Local Journalist    |     J.J. Act | Accused's Age at Offense Critical - Juvenility Must Be Addressed: Kerala High Court Directs Special Court to Reframe Charges in POCSO Case    |     Foreign Laws Must Be Proved Like Facts: Delhi HC Grants Bail in Cryptocurrency Money Laundering Case    |    

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Copy of Will and Probate Due to Lack of Evidence

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court, comprising Justices Pankaj Mithal and V. Ramasubramanian, recently dismissed a petition filed by A. Wilson Prince, seeking a copy of a will and probate in a testamentary matter. The case revolved around the availability of the original will and the destruction of records under the Destruction of Records Act, 1917.

The petitioner had requested the court to order an investigation into the fate of the will, claiming that the original document had been improperly handled. However, the court noted that the petitioner had not seen the copy of the will and was unaware of its contents, making it difficult to provide relief based on mere speculation.

The court further emphasized that the executor of the will had fulfilled their responsibilities by obtaining probate, filing the necessary inventory, and submitting final accounts in accordance with Section 317 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. There were no complaints regarding the distribution of assets under the will.

The judges acknowledged that the original will should have been preserved or returned to the executor after probate. However, due to the lack of evidence and the petitioner's limited knowledge of the will's contents, the court concluded that an investigation could not be ordered. Therefore, the High Court's decision to dismiss the writ petition was upheld.

The Supreme Court's decision highlighted the importance of proper evidence and the inability to grant relief based on speculation alone. The dismissal of the special leave petition signifies that the court cannot intervene when the original will is not traceable after a significant period of time.

Case Title: A. Wilson Prince v. The Nazar & Ors.

D.D. May 15, 2023

 

Similar News