'Clever Drafting' Cannot Resurrect Time-Barred Suits: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Vexatious Plaint No Absolute Right To Choose Route For Religious Procession: Bombay High Court Dismisses Plea Against Police Restriction Acquittal In Section 498A IPC Case Does Not Bar Proceedings Under Domestic Violence Act: Chhattisgarh High Court Calcutta High Court Refuses To Allow Amendment Introducing 'Date Of Knowledge' In Tenancy Dispute Allahabad High Court Rejects 'Attempt To Murder' Charge Citing Absence Of Grievous Injury And Fundamental Prosecution Flaws Uttarakhand High Court Quashes Temporary Acquisition Of Private Helipad, Orders Restoration Of Possession End Of IP Court Shopping?': Delhi High Court Refers Conflict On Territorial Jurisdiction To Larger Bench MACT Cannot Adjudicate Personal Accident; Deceased Tortfeasor's Heirs Cannot Claim From Own Insurer For His Wrong: Gujarat High Court Do Not Shut Doors To Litigants: J&K&L High Court Sets Aside Rejection Of Plaint, Rules Summary Suit Can Be Converted To Regular Recovery Suit Cannot Expect A Spouse To Endure This Forever: Karnataka High Court Upholds Divorce, Defines Limits Of 'Ordinary Wear And Tear' In Marriage Custodial Interrogation Unnecessary': Kerala High Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail In ₹9 Crore Cheating Case As Accused Complied With Sharjah Decree Cannot Arbitrarily Value Damages: Punjab & Haryana High Court Rules Plaintiff Must Pay Ad Valorem Court Fee On Specific Claims Remarriage Of Widow Does Not Disinherit Daughter: Madras High Court 'Fatal Flaw' In Specific Performance Suits: Madhya Pradesh High Court Dismisses Plea For Failing To Plead 'Readiness And Willingness' Section 125 CrPC  | Wife's Convenience Must Be Looked At In Matrimonial Disputes: Orissa High Court Rejects Husband's Plea To Transfer Maintenance Case Executing Court Cannot Go Behind Decree: Punjab & Haryana High Court Rejects State's Plea Against Demolition Of Unauthorized Bus Stand Wall

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Copy of Will and Probate Due to Lack of Evidence

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court, comprising Justices Pankaj Mithal and V. Ramasubramanian, recently dismissed a petition filed by A. Wilson Prince, seeking a copy of a will and probate in a testamentary matter. The case revolved around the availability of the original will and the destruction of records under the Destruction of Records Act, 1917.

The petitioner had requested the court to order an investigation into the fate of the will, claiming that the original document had been improperly handled. However, the court noted that the petitioner had not seen the copy of the will and was unaware of its contents, making it difficult to provide relief based on mere speculation.

The court further emphasized that the executor of the will had fulfilled their responsibilities by obtaining probate, filing the necessary inventory, and submitting final accounts in accordance with Section 317 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. There were no complaints regarding the distribution of assets under the will.

The judges acknowledged that the original will should have been preserved or returned to the executor after probate. However, due to the lack of evidence and the petitioner's limited knowledge of the will's contents, the court concluded that an investigation could not be ordered. Therefore, the High Court's decision to dismiss the writ petition was upheld.

The Supreme Court's decision highlighted the importance of proper evidence and the inability to grant relief based on speculation alone. The dismissal of the special leave petition signifies that the court cannot intervene when the original will is not traceable after a significant period of time.

Case Title: A. Wilson Prince v. The Nazar & Ors.

D.D. May 15, 2023

 

Latest Legal News