Section 9 A&C Act Relief Available Until Award Is Actually Enforced, Even After It Becomes Enforceable: Telangana High Court Matrimonial Litigations Must Not Degenerate Into Contests Of Mutual Humiliation By Weaponising Private Images: Delhi High Court Unarmed Witnesses’ Inaction Against Armed Assailants Justified By Instinct Of Self-Preservation; Testimony Cannot Be Discarded: Allahabad High Court Ocular Evidence Outweighs Motive: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Murder Conviction Based On Reliable Eyewitness Testimony Arrest Illegal If Written 'Grounds Of Arrest' Not Furnished To Accused; Communication Of Mere 'Reasons' Insufficient: Bombay High Court Absence Of Territorial Jurisdiction No Ground To Quash FIR At Threshold If Allegations Disclose Cognizable Offence: Calcutta High Court Proof Of Demand Is Sine Qua Non For PC Act Conviction; Voice Recordings Inadmissible Without Sec 65-B Certificate: Chhattisgarh HC Section 91 IEA | Disposition Of Immovable Property Cannot Be Proved By Oral Evidence If Written Document Not Produced: Delhi High Court NRC Legacy Data Extracts Inadmissible Without Section 65B Certificate; PAN Card & EPIC Not Proof Of Citizenship: Gauhati High Court Testimony Of Injured Witness Entitled To Great Weight; Minor Contradictions Due To Lapse Of Memory Cannot Discard Prosecution Case: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 164 CrPC Statement Recorded Without Procedural Safeguards Or 'Cooling-Off' Period Not A Valid Confession: Jharkhand High Court Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Investigation Is At A Nascent Stage If Custodial Interrogation Is Not Indispensable: Telangana High Court Actual Pay Drawn During Last 10 Months Must Be Basis For Pension Calculation, Regardless Of Notional Pay In Parent Bank: Punjab & Haryana High Court Kerala High Court Remands Teacher Seniority Dispute For Fresh Consideration To Verify If Senior Teacher Relinquished Promotion Claim Receipt Of DNA Report After Testimony Doesn't Automatically Confer Right To Recall Witness For Further Cross-Examination: Madhya Pradesh High Court Possession Of 'Bhang' Not An Offence Under NDPS Act, Specific Definition Excludes It: Jharkhand High Court Acquits Man Trial Court Cannot Reject Request For Handwriting Expert Merely Because Signatures Are On Photocopies: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Supreme Court criticizes Enforcement Directorate's prolonged delay in filing final report in money laundering case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


New Delhi, April 20, 2023: The Supreme Court of India criticizes Enforcement Directorate's prolonged delay in filing final report in money laundering case and has allowed the appeal filed by Sanjay Raghunath Agarwal, directing his release on bail in ECIR No.HYZO/26/2022 dated 05.05.2022, subject to such terms and conditions as may be imposed by the Metropolitan Sessions Judge-cum-Special Court under PMLA, Nampally, Hyderabad. The bench comprising of Justices V. Ramasubramanian and Pankaj Mithal, while hearing Criminal Appeal No.1198 of 2023 arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.1655 of 2023, observed that the continued incarceration of the appellant, who is a Chartered Accountant by profession, since September 26, 2022, may not be justified.

The Enforcement Directorate had filed an information report in ECIR No.HYZO/26/2022 dated 05.05.2022, naming six individuals and nine entities, including the appellant, as persons suspected of committing the offence of money-laundering under Section 3 of the Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002. Pursuant to the report, the appellant was arrested by the Enforcement Directorate on September 26, 2022, and was remanded to judicial custody by the Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, on September 27, 2022. However, no charge-sheet has been filed against him in the predicate offence for the past more than nine years.

The bench took note of the specific role attributed to the appellant in the prosecution complaint lodged by the Enforcement Directorate, which accused him of creating the entire infrastructure for Farmax and Arun Panchariya to bring about the fraudulent GDR issue and of providing formats for Board Resolutions and transferring funds from the account of Farmax with EURAM Bank to the Farmax subsidiary, namely, M/s. Farmax International FZE in UAE. However, the bench observed that the appellant is a Chartered Accountant by profession, and there is nothing in the prosecution complaint to show that he is in possession of "the proceeds of crime."

The bench also took note of the fact that the registration of the ECIR and the lodging of the prosecution complaint in the year 2022 were a sequel to the registration of the FIR for the predicate offence way back in the year 2013, and no final report has been filed in the FIR for the predicate offence for the past nine years. It observed that the continued incarceration of the appellant may not be justified and directed his release on bail subject to such terms and conditions as may be imposed by the Metropolitan Sessions Judge-cum-Special Court under PMLA, Nampally, Hyderabad. The conditions to be imposed by the Special Court shall include the surrender of the appellant's passport and his regular appearance before the Special Court whenever the prosecution complaint filed by the Enforcement Directorate is posted.

SANJAY RAGHUNATH AGARWAL    VS THE DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT       

Latest Legal News